Microsoft's new EU disclosure shows exactly how tech giants separate profits from where the work happens

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,002   +58
Staff
Bottom line: Microsoft's latest regulatory filing in Europe pulls back the curtain on how the company distributes its profits across borders, and the split is far from even. The company published a country-by-country breakdown of its finances for the fiscal year ending June 2025, under a European Union rule that requires large multinationals to show where they earn money and pay taxes. The data shows a familiar pattern in the tech sector: a heavy concentration of profits in low-tax jurisdictions, with far less reported in larger, higher-tax markets where business activity is more visible.

Microsoft said nearly 40% of its pretax income was booked in Ireland, even though only about 3% of its global workforce is based in the country. In Germany, by contrast, the company reported less than half of 1% of its global profits. Across Europe as a whole, excluding Ireland, Microsoft generated under 2% of its worldwide pretax earnings.

The numbers reflect how tech companies structure their operations. Companies can route revenue from software, cloud services, and intellectual property through subsidiaries in lower-tax countries, even when most of the sales, support, and infrastructure sit somewhere else. The EU's reporting requirement does not change those mechanics, but it does make them more visible.

In some cases, the figures are stark. Microsoft reported profit margins of 142% in Luxembourg, alongside a tax rate of about 3%. The company recorded $283 million in pretax income there with just 34 employees. In Ireland, profit margins were 24%, with a tax rate just over 14%.

Meanwhile, in countries with higher corporate tax rates – Germany, France, and Italy among them – Microsoft reported single-digit margins, sometimes around 5%. They are major markets for Microsoft's enterprise software and cloud services, yet they account for only a small share of its reported profits.

Microsoft has said the data does not tell the full story. Differences in accounting rules across countries can create inconsistencies, the company noted in a blog post released alongside the filing. "Microsoft is committed to a tax structure that reflects where our people work, where we invest, and where functions, assets, and risks occur," wrote Jeff Bullwinkel, the company's top lawyer in Europe.

He also pointed to capital investments, particularly in data centers, and local partnerships as part of Microsoft's broader economic footprint. "Tax is one important measure of contribution, but it is not the only one," he wrote.

One tax expert says the report underscores how difficult it has been to align profits with real economic activity, despite years of regulatory effort. Reuven Avi-Yonah, a tax law professor at the University of Michigan, told The New York Times that the data shows companies can still "shift their profits to low-tax jurisdictions with no corresponding shift in real activity."

The EU transparency rule behind the disclosure was passed in 2021 after long-running criticism of how companies like Microsoft, Google, Apple, and others structure their taxes. Iban García del Blanco, one of the directive's lead negotiators, said the goal was to improve "the transparency on where they pay their taxes."

Microsoft's filing also lands as it faces pressure in the United States. The Internal Revenue Service is challenging the company's past profit-shifting practices and is seeking nearly $29 billion in back taxes. Microsoft has said it disagrees, stating in a securities filing that it "will vigorously contest" the proposed tax bills.

Globally, efforts to rein in these practices have had mixed results. More than 100 countries have adopted rules tied to a minimum corporate tax, but enforcement remains uneven. A recent agreement between the Trump administration and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development has limited how those rules apply to US companies.

That gap has real consequences. US multinationals avoided at least $40 billion in taxes last year by routing profits through low-tax jurisdictions, according to an analysis by the New York Times.

For Microsoft, Ireland remains central to its structure. The company says it has spent decades building up its operations there, with about 6,600 employees now based in the country. It serves as Microsoft's main European hub, even as it also functions as a key location for booking profits.

The new disclosures do not change how Microsoft operates, but they do make its structure easier to see. For a company built on software and cloud infrastructure, where most of the value sits in code and systems rather than physical assets, the disclosures make the gap between business activity and reported profits harder to ignore.

Permalink to story:

 
That's why World should stop income tax and introduce money tranfer tax. No one would be able to avoid It, unless tax-evade using cash, which would be expensive in itself. Bonus would be corporations would be pressed to keep more and more work in-house rather than outsource outside the country, like China. And less speculation, more production in Your GDP basket. But lobbysts would not allow It in million years.
Ireland may look like one of the richest country in the World by GDP/capita, but in fact average Irish doesn't see that money.
 
Wait, weren't some claiming that tech giants were not making profits in the EU and that even the slightest compliance to regulations or penalty because of non-compliance would be devastating to those poor companies. They must only stay in the EU because of charity.
 
Ireland should be really ashamed of their tax haven scamming. They've been skimming tax off big companies around the world for years. If you can't contribute anything good to society become a tax haven and stop other countries getting the tax they deserve. Really sleezy behaviour and I'm surprised the EU let them do this all this time.
 
The EU really needs to overhaul how these things work in one way or another, it's clear to the EU that the system is being abused. It's clear to the abusers that there's a massive benefit in doing it this way.

(And if Trump wants to throw a tariff hissy fit because we can't 'unfairly' tax big tech - who even cares at this point)
 
The EU really needs to overhaul how these things work in one way or another, it's clear to the EU that the system is being abused. It's clear to the abusers that there's a massive benefit in doing it this way.

(And if Trump wants to throw a tariff hissy fit because we can't 'unfairly' tax big tech - who even cares at this point)
He only cares because they back up trucks full of money to his door to keep him on grifting on their behalf as well as his own.
 
Ireland should be really ashamed of their tax haven scamming. They've been skimming tax off big companies around the world for years. If you can't contribute anything good to society become a tax haven and stop other countries getting the tax they deserve. Really sleezy behaviour and I'm surprised the EU let them do this all this time.
If Ireland stops doing it, how will they provide hospitality and permanent place to live for millions of their guests from Africa? That kindness needs a source for funding. Everything has a price.
 
That's why World should stop income tax and introduce money tranfer tax. No one would be able to avoid It, unless tax-evade using cash, which would be expensive in itself. Bonus would be corporations would be pressed to keep more and more work in-house rather than outsource outside the country, like China. And less speculation, more production in Your GDP basket. But lobbysts would not allow It in million years.
Ireland may look like one of the richest country in the World by GDP/capita, but in fact average Irish doesn't see that money.
We all know why this is not happening. People who control the system are happy to have it go the way it is now. And since they control it...
 
If Ireland stops doing it, how will they provide hospitality and permanent place to live for millions of their guests from Africa? That kindness needs a source for funding. Everything has a price.
Homo sapiens as a whole started off in Africa, and some went to Eurasia and Australia.
 
Some very poorly thought-out ideas here.

That's why World should stop income tax and introduce money tranfer tax. No one would be able to avoid It, unless tax-evade using cash, which would be expensive in itself.
So a business or person borrowing money would pay the tax twice: once on the loan, and again when repaid. And if you exempt loans from the tax, you'd see all sorts of transactions structured as "loans".

On avoiding payment entirely, you wouldn't even need cash: simply convert the funds into any commodity, then ship that commodity. It would be far less expensive than the 25% - 50% tax rates in many nations.

I hope they will tax them where the customers are paying. Makes no sense someone buys software and services in Germany, but seller calculates tax in Cyprus.
If a customer buys software in Germany, they'll pay sales tax in Germany. As for profits, how on earth do you suggest Germany tax a Chinese firm, using CCP accounting rules written to allow their firms to show whatever "profit" they like, if it will give them a competitive advantage?

The EU really needs to overhaul how these things work in one way or another
The very best way would be for EU regulators to learn economics, viz. that corporations never actually pay taxes. "Corporate" taxes are merely a means to semi-invisibly further tax consumers.

(And if Trump wants to throw a tariff hissy fit because we can't 'unfairly' tax big tech)
Trump is objecting over your targeting US firms for taxation, while exempting smaller British firms from that same tax. Of the UK "digital services' tax, only 32 companies in total are affected, none of which are British, and more than 85% of the total revenue collected is from US tech giants.

Homo sapiens as a whole started off in Africa, and some went to Eurasia and Australia.
How many of those migratory homo sapiens do you allow to live freely in your own home?
 
How many of those migratory homo sapiens do you allow to live freely in your own home?
The Native Americans should have used that line on the migrants coming by ship from Europe. The Celts should have told that to the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes. The list goes on.
 
The very best way would be for EU regulators to learn economics, viz. that corporations never actually pay taxes. "Corporate" taxes are merely a means to semi-invisibly further tax consumers.


Trump is objecting over your targeting US firms for taxation, while exempting smaller British firms from that same tax. Of the UK "digital services' tax, only 32 companies in total are affected, none of which are British, and more than 85% of the total revenue collected is from US tech giants.
US tech services are dominant with Netflix, Facebook, YouTube etc etc so I'd be surprised if they weren't the lion's share of the total revenue. If they're making money in Europe it would be nice if they paid taxes for that.
I'm not informed enough on the subject to offer the right solution to the problem but as much as possible being funneled through Ireland isn't it. Massive profits made across Europe to have a small portion of it stick in one member state that charges them the least isn't a functional system.
(The UK post-Brexit can do whatever they want imo, don't expect any sound economic decisions from them)

Digital services are hard to track so if smaller companies fall through the net I'm not too bothered but I'd want Spotify (Swedish/EU) to contribute just as much Facebook etc. If the EU decides to tax foreign companies more heavily to reduce foreign dependencies that's alright as well imo (within reason*). Similarly, if the US decides to tax Spotify more heavily because they'd rather have Apple Music/Google Music succeed - fair game.

*Within reason being that things actually stay competitive to some degree. I don't want garbage just because it's European.
 
The Native Americans should have used that line on the migrants coming by ship from Europe. The Celts should have told that to the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes. The list goes on.
The Native Americans tried that line, but due to their inferior level of culture, failed miserably.

Fun fact: As recorded in Hakluyt's travels, one of the first requests the natives had of arriving Europeans was for steel swords and spears-- the better to subjugate their neighbors they were warring with. The only ones to treat Native Americans worse than Europeans were other natives.

US tech services are dominant with Netflix, Facebook, YouTube etc etc so I'd be surprised if they weren't the lion's share of the total revenue.
It's called disparate impact -- and intentionally so. The UK carefully crafted that tax based on global revenues, not just British revenues for that very reason ... to extract money from US firms but not their own. It's literally no different than a US tax limited to British firms -- the very thing you claim to despise.
 
Last edited:
“ Microsoft's filing also lands as it faces pressure in the United States. The Internal Revenue Service is challenging the company's past profit-shifting practices and is seeking nearly $29 billion in back taxes. Microsoft has said it disagrees, stating in a securities filing that it "will vigorously contest" the proposed tax bills.”

We already know how this is going to end. Big tech companies are going to buy more $Trump crypto, his net worth is going to go up another $ billion, and shortly afterwards the IRS is going to announce sweetheart deals with the companies that bought his crypto.
 
We already know how this is going to end. Big tech companies are going to buy more $Trump crypto, his net worth is going to go up another $ billion, and shortly afterwards the IRS is going to announce sweetheart deals with the companies that bought his crypto.
Where would the fascist Left be without their lies and disinformation, eh? It was President Autopen who entered politics dirt poor then exited worth $150M, and the only president we know to openly sell pardons was Bill Clinton to Marc Rich, immediately after his wife wrote a $500,000 check to the Clinton Foundation, right there in the Oval Office.

As for Trump's crypto ventures, I could take the sleazy route the Left diid with Joe and Hunter Biden, and note they were founded and controlled by Trump's sons. But instead I'll merely point out the obvious and important fact that no special favors were given or received. Binance does list the Trump coin ... but they also list literally every other crypto coin in existence -- just like all other crypto exchanges -- so the idea that Binance gave them some sort of special consideration is true 70-IQ absurdist material.
 
Where would the fascist Left be without their lies and disinformation, eh? It was President Autopen who entered politics dirt poor then exited worth $150M, and the only president we know to openly sell pardons was Bill Clinton to Marc Rich, immediately after his wife wrote a $500,000 check to the Clinton Foundation, right there in the Oval Office.

As for Trump's crypto ventures, I could take the sleazy route the Left diid with Joe and Hunter Biden, and note they were founded and controlled by Trump's sons. But instead I'll merely point out the obvious and important fact that no special favors were given or received. Binance does list the Trump coin ... but they also list literally every other crypto coin in existence -- just like all other crypto exchanges -- so the idea that Binance gave them some sort of special consideration is true 70-IQ absurdist material.
If the Clintons and Bidens did as you said then shame on them and they should be held accountsble. That doesn’t mean Trump should get a free pass.
 
Where would the fascist Left be without their lies and disinformation, eh? It was President Autopen who entered politics dirt poor then exited worth $150M, and the only president we know to openly sell pardons was Bill Clinton to Marc Rich, immediately after his wife wrote a $500,000 check to the Clinton Foundation, right there in the Oval Office.

As for Trump's crypto ventures, I could take the sleazy route the Left diid with Joe and Hunter Biden, and note they were founded and controlled by Trump's sons. But instead I'll merely point out the obvious and important fact that no special favors were given or received. Binance does list the Trump coin ... but they also list literally every other crypto coin in existence -- just like all other crypto exchanges -- so the idea that Binance gave them some sort of special consideration is true 70-IQ absurdist material.
You have been watching to much Fox, they may claim to be news as well as fair and unbiased. But they aren't, they repeat the lies of Donald and his friends.

Inform your self.
 
If the Clintons and Bidens did as you said then shame on them and they should be held accountsble. That doesn’t mean Trump should get a free pass.
The point is the hypocrisy of those who gave Clinton and Biden a free pass for actual crimes are now trying to invent a crime to hang on Trump. What quid pro quo did Binance give, that they (and every other crypto exchaange) don't also grant to every other cryptocoin under the sun?

You have been watching to [sic] much Fox, they may claim to be news as well as fair and unbiased. But they aren't, [sic] they repeat the lies of Donald and his friends.

Inform your self. [sic]
Despite your broken English allegations, my facts are correct:

"...On January 20, 2001, in the final hours of his presidency, Bill Clinton granted a controversial full pardon to billionaire fugitive commodities trader Marc Rich. Rich had fled to Switzerland in 1983 to avoid prosecution for tax evasion, fraud, and conducting illegal oil trades with Iran during the 1979 hostage crisis....

The decision immediately sparked bipartisan outrage and a congressional investigation. Critics accused Clinton of a quid pro quo. The allegations were fueled by the revelation that Rich’s ex-wife, Denise Rich, had been a prolific donor to Democratic campaigns, Hillary Clinton's Senate bid, and had given $450,000 to the Clinton Presidential Library Foundation...."


Also:

"...Binance carries over 500 cryptocurrencies, Including major market leaders, altcoins, stablecoins, DeFi tokens, and meme coins. You can view the complete, real-time directory on the Binance Markets Overview page...."
 
The Native Americans tried that line, but due to their inferior level of culture, failed miserably.

Fun fact: As recorded in Hakluyt's travels, one of the first requests the natives had of arriving Europeans was for steel swords and spears-- the better to subjugate their neighbors they were warring with. The only ones to treat Native Americans worse than Europeans were other natives.
I half expected such a response: framing the invaders as bringers of "superior" civilisation, and the "backwards and blood-thirsty, can't-stand-his-fellows" indigenous. An old sentiment from the settler-colonialism instruction manual.
 
Back