Missouri town ousts half of its city council after $6 billion AI data center approval

midian182

Posts: 11,750   +178
Staff member
Facepalm: It's another day, another sign of the growing anti-AI data center sentiment in the US. One week after the city council of Festus, Missouri, voted 6-2 to approve a development agreement for a $6 billion facility, voters removed all four incumbents who were up for reelection, changing half of the eight-seat council in a single night.

Festus leaders pitched the project, set to span roughly 360 acres north of Highway 67 and Route CC, as a once-in-a-generation windfall, but many residents saw it as a massive development being pushed through over local objections.

More than two dozen residents spoke at the March 30 meeting and all opposed the project. Some homeowners near the site said they feared for their property values, while others were alarmed by a voluntary buyout program tied to nearby homes.

It goes without saying that city officials and developer CRG, part of Chicago-based Clayco, have painted a very different picture. In a public statement posted before the vote, Mayor Sam Richards said the project would bring a $6 billion initial investment and an estimated $1.3 billion in property taxes, utility taxes, and community benefit payments over 25 years.

Richards also said CRG would not seek real property tax abatement and that the city's utility tax would not be capped. Clayco founder Bob Clark later defended the proposal, saying the company would not move forward if it could not be built safely.

But the pitch didn't have the intended effect; the four winning challengers ran on anti-data-center and pro-transparency platforms.

The political damage may not be over, either. Residents are backing a petition aimed at removing the mayor and the rest of the council. There's also a lawsuit filed by Wake Up Jeffco and nearby property owners that seeks to invalidate the city's approval, alleging illegal rezoning, insufficient public notice, and private discussions that should have happened in public.

Festus is not an isolated case. Missouri has already seen similar anger in Independence, where voters ousted council members who supported major AI data center tax breaks.

It was reported last week that 13 shots were fired at Indianapolis councilman Ron Gibson's home after he backed a $500 million data center project that has caused months of protests and rallies from residents. A note was left on his doorstep that read "No Data Centers."

A January Pew Research Center survey of 8,512 US adults found that more respondents viewed data centers negatively in terms of environmental impact and energy costs than positively.

Permalink to story:

 
I guess a future scenario with data centers in space is probably gonna happen. No wonder SpaceX is set to get a $2T valuation. Starlink satellites are already effectively servers operating at a profit, but a way smaller scope than what a data center would offer.
 
Having data centers by a ton that is a community choice per state...another is not listening to the community and firing the politicians that support that community is another....like the Republican State mention here.
 
People aren't too fond of being technologically subjugated... Imagine that!

All these datacenter deals give us a fantastic metric by which to precisely measure governmental corruption by corporate entities across the country in real time. We can drill down to the specific tactics being used by each council as they are wined and dined to work against the best interests of their people.
 
People remove incumbents for all sorts of reasons.
Implying the city council members were not reelected because the council approved a datacenter is nothing but a wildly frivolous speculation. There's no reason whatsoever to believe election results were influenced by exactly that one decision, and not by the hundreds of other decisions the city council made throughout their term.
 
People aren't too fond of being technologically subjugated... Imagine that!
I literally laughed out loud at this. Even ignoring the notion that AI is in general subjugating the masses, the idea that a specific datacenter in your particular area will alter that in any way, shape, or form, is beyond absurd. If anything, the reverse is true ... if the world's AI hub becomes CCP China rather than the free world, you'll soon learn what actual subjugation truly is.
 
Last edited:
Having data centers by a ton that is a community choice per state...another is not listening to the community and firing the politicians that support that community is another....like the Republican State mention here.
So, the choice of including the term “Republican” here was entirely yours - not indicative of any larger issue. You just cherry-picked one jurisdiction for.. some reason? Reddit karma?

If it was a larger issue indicative of Republicans, why was this posted from 3 days ago in debatably the most blue state in the union?

Data doesn’t support your… opinions.
 
So, the choice of including the term “Republican” here was entirely yours - not indicative of any larger issue. You just cherry-picked one jurisdiction for.. some reason? Reddit karma?

If it was a larger issue indicative of Republicans, why was this posted from 3 days ago in debatably the most blue state in the union?

Data doesn’t support your… opinions.
I'm not picking cherry picking, I'm basing it
So, the choice of including the term “Republican” here was entirely yours - not indicative of any larger issue. You just cherry-picked one jurisdiction for.. some reason? Reddit karma?

If it was a larger issue indicative of Republicans, why was this posted from 3 days ago in debatably the most blue state in the union?

Data doesn’t support your… opinions.
Of course there's always going to be a citizen against something, another is by affecting personally the politicians speaking on behalf the community....that you can't say it has happened in a blue state....with that in mind in such a diverse opened minded state like California there will be a diverse tange of opinions.
 
I'm not picking cherry picking, I'm basing it ... Of course there's always going to be a citizen against something, another is by affecting personally the politicians speaking on behalf the community....that you can't say it has happened in a blue state....with that in mind in such a diverse opened minded state like California there will be a diverse tange of opinions.
I'm not sure I'm properly decoding that word salad, but the fact remains that the largest state in the US for datacenter construction is Blue Virginia.
 
I love how almost every thread on thus site needs to be hijacked into a Republican/Democrat issue (or Trump/Anti-Trump)…

The issue of AI datacenters has nothing to do with either party. They are simply the future. What people want is all the advantages of AI but they don’t want the infrastructure near their homes… well, that’s all well and good but… they gave to go SOMEWHERE…
 
People remove incumbents for all sorts of reasons.
Implying the city council members were not reelected because the council approved a datacenter is nothing but a wildly frivolous speculation. There's no reason whatsoever to believe election results were influenced by exactly that one decision, and not by the hundreds of other decisions the city council made throughout their term.

It's probably a complete coincidence that all 4 new members are against the data center. It's also a coincidence that during the first council meeting with the new numbers, the tiny room was practically overflowing with people who cheered at the prospect of the new council reversing the decision of their predecessors.

I mean, for all we know, the incumbents could have been ousted because they couldn't figure out snow removal. It's a great mystery!
 
Republican states and their greed have no bounds...even if it means to crush the opposition.

Pardon the obtuse beratement I’ll provide you with here. Data centers are for collecting OUR data to use it against US -where you go, what you do, how you’re doing it, when you’re doing it, how often you’re doing. You’re part of the problem if you think these things are party politics or a L/R issue.

The future of privacy and freedom is at stake, and the best you can do is offer a mediocre jab at party lines. Shame on you for your shallow thinking, unless of course this IS in fact the world you and your children and their children live in: a fully surveiled, 15-minute city, wherein you won’t buy or sell without a chip in your head or hand, with programable electronic currency with an expiry date.
 
I'm not picking cherry picking, I'm basing it

Of course there's always going to be a citizen against something, another is by affecting personally the politicians speaking on behalf the community....that you can't say it has happened in a blue state....with that in mind in such a diverse opened minded state like California there will be a diverse tange of opinions.
You’re incorrect - the politicians in multiple blue states have been affected by datacenter installations -

“Warrenton, Virginia (November 2024): In a dramatic political shift, voters completely ousted the entire Warrenton town council following their approval of a highly controversial Amazon data center project. The newly elected council was composed entirely of project opponents who were given a direct mandate by voters to block the development.”

This also happened in Oregon in June of 2023, granted it was the dismissal of Port Authority employees for the same line of reasoning - so the concept holds.

Finally, your statement of California having “open-minded” individuals that could facilitate this discourse - so anyone not as open-minded as the running joke state of CA isn’t allowed to have the same opinions?
 
It's probably a complete coincidence that all 4 new members are against the data center. It's also a coincidence that during the first council meeting with the new numbers, the tiny room was practically overflowing with people who cheered at the prospect of the new council reversing the decision of their predecessors.

I mean, for all we know, the incumbents could have been ousted because they couldn't figure out snow removal. It's a great mystery!
How do you know "all 4 new members are against the data center" ? Nothing in the article suggests that. There's no reason whatsoever to believe the datacenter has influenced the election at all.
 
I'm not sure I'm properly decoding that word salad, but the fact remains that the largest state in the US for datacenter construction is Blue Virginia.

Calling Virginia "Blue" is a bit disingenuous. Spanberger has only been in office for roughly 3 month, and not only that, but if you look at the history of data centers in VA, most were built during periods of time that the GOP controlled either the VA house or Senate, if not both, irrespective of the Governor at the time being a Democrat (not to mention Youngkin was a Republican for the last 4 years). In fact, if you go back to 1998 (arguably the rise of Data Center Alley), the GOP held a minimum of 2/3 of either the Governor's office, state House, or state Senate 21/28 years.

So while the Dems have a trifecta as of right now in VA, VA has for the last 25+ years widely (and correctly) been considered a purple state for that reason.
 
How do you know "all 4 new members are against the data center" ? Nothing in the article suggests that. There's no reason whatsoever to believe the datacenter has influenced the election at all.
You clearly didn't watch the local news video embedded in the article.
 
How do you know "all 4 new members are against the data center" ? Nothing in the article suggests that. There's no reason whatsoever to believe the datacenter has influenced the election at all.
It’s called following a link… or *gasp* doing some research… maybe try some before spouting nonsense?
 
Calling Virginia "Blue" is a bit disingenuous. Spanberger has only been in office for roughly 3 month
Oops! Virginia last elected a Republican senator in 2002, and hasn't voted for a Republican President since 2004. And Democrats have held unbroken control of the state Senate since 2020.

...In fact, if you go back to 1998 (arguably the rise of Data Center Alley), the GOP held a minimum of 2/3 of either the Governor's office, state House, or state Senate
1998 was long ago. What's happening in VA today?

"...Massive New Construction: In the first nine months of 2025 alone, permits were filed for 54 new data centers in Virginia, the largest single-year spike in planned projects....

Shift to Larger Projects: Recent developments are characterized by larger, more power-intensive AI-driven data centers rather than just more numerous smaller ones...."
 
Last edited:
I love how almost every thread on thus site needs to be hijacked into a Republican/Democrat issue (or Trump/Anti-Trump)…

The issue of AI datacenters has nothing to do with either party. They are simply the future. What people want is all the advantages of AI but they don’t want the infrastructure near their homes… well, that’s all well and good but… they gave to go SOMEWHERE…
So, NIMBY-ism...again.
 
Wait until you Google the top 10 states with the most data centers in them currently.

Won’t support your statement very well. :)
I looked it up, and it appears that you are incorrect, there are a lot of red states allowing data centers. Most of the data center concentration in blue states are around the Washington DC area and certain swing states. Better check your data. Of the top 10, 3 are decidedly blue states, 6 are red states and 1 is a swing state. The "data doesn't support your...opinions" either.
 
I looked it up, and it appears that you are incorrect... Better check your data. Of the top 10, 3 are decidedly blue states, 6 are red states and 1 is a swing state. The "data doesn't support your...opinions" either.
Not even remotely correct.

Top 10 states by data centers
  • 1. Virginia (Blue)
  • 2. Texas (Red)
  • 3. California (Blue)
  • 4. Illinois (Blue)
  • 5. Ohio (Red)
  • 6. Arizona (Swing)
  • 7. Georgia (Swing)
  • 8. New York (Blue)
  • 9. Oregon (Blue)
  • 10. Washington (Blue)

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-r...-centers-in-the-us-are-coming-to-rural-areas/
 
I looked it up, and it appears that you are incorrect, there are a lot of red states allowing data centers. Most of the data center concentration in blue states are around the Washington DC area and certain swing states. Better check your data. Of the top 10, 3 are decidedly blue states, 6 are red states and 1 is a swing state. The "data doesn't support your...opinions" either.
You might want to re-check that data…
 
Back