More companies are rehiring workers they replaced with AI after automation fails to deliver

midian182

Posts: 11,726   +177
Staff member
Why it matters: Good news for those worried about losing their jobs to AI. More evidence is emerging that companies are losing faith in the technology's ability to replace humans, with an increasing number of firms rehiring people who were let go because of AI automation.

It was reported last week that Ford was re-employing and promoting more than 350 veteran engineers. Because their often-undocumented experience was not captured in the datasets used to train the AI systems, Ford was running into knowledge gaps when it came to identifying and preventing issues.

It's not just Ford, either. CNBC reports that the Commonwealth Bank of Australia laid off more than 40 customer service staff last year and replaced them with an AI voice bot. Unsurprisingly, it couldn't perform its job as well as a human, leading to an increase in the number of calls and CBA reversing its job cuts.

CBA later admitted that it "did not adequately consider all relevant business considerations" when announcing the redundancies.

Elsewhere, IBM, a company that cut thousands of jobs last year as it pushed deeper into AI and automation, said in February that it would triple entry-level hiring for roles covering "all these jobs we're being told AI can do."

The company said the new positions will focus on tasks requiring human judgment, customer interaction, and oversight of AI systems.

There was also Klarna. The buy now, pay later/shopping service admitted it was hiring humans again after their AI replacements offered a "low quality" output.

This doesn't mean that layoffs because of AI have stopped. Oracle was the latest tech giant to announce huge cuts – 21,000 people are going – while admitting that AI is playing a part. And let's not forget that there have been 122,524 tech employees laid off from 214 companies this year.

However, it's starting to look more like executives' once-unfaltering belief that AI can replace everyone is starting to falter. In June, it was reported that multiple studies showed more employers rehiring recently eliminated positions after overestimating AI's productivity gains and cost savings – or, at the very least, regretting the decision.

A report by Orgvue found that while 39% of business leaders made employees redundant due to AI deployment, 55% admitted wrong decisions about those redundancies were made. Another 2025 report from Forrester Research predicted that roughly half of AI-attributed layoffs would be quietly reversed.

According to data from Robert Half sent to CNBC, 32% of US hiring managers said they eliminated a role primarily due to AI and later rehired for the same or a similar position.

The rehiring shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone who has seen this report, which revealed that 56% of CEOs said introducing AI hasn't produced any cost or revenue benefits for their companies.

There's little doubt that AI-related job losses will continue, but it appears those who are laid off are increasingly likely to be rehired once their bosses realize there are some human skills a machine can't replace.

Permalink to story:

 
Oracle bet the farm on AI datacenters and cant afford to perform their main business anymore so yeah, they are letting people go ”because of AI”
 
They mostly don't rehire people to do the same task as before.

Many jobs consist of repetitive tasks, AI will for sure be able to replace these kind of workers. Humans make far more errors in repetitive tasks.
 
"AI wont come at the cost of jobs"
Should have always been
"AI isn't ready to take over all jobs, yet."

Companies are still figuring out who's replaceable. They jumped the gun but will no doubt try again (and again, and again).
 
This is the "augment people with AI" time, it is not the "replace everyone with AI" moment yet. You still need humans to validate AI responses right now.
 
Oracle bet the farm on AI datacenters and cant afford to perform their main business anymore so yeah, they are letting people go ”because of AI”
The funniest part is that this is literally just band aid. They hope to save $10bn on layoffs, at best. Their AI debt is at around $130bn and counting.
 
The sad thing is that this "learning event" for these inept executives upended these returning engineers lives for a time. How long are we employees going to tolerate this repetitive layoff cycle that seems to be the only trick executives know? It's the main reason I took over my Dad's O&G company when he passed away. I was completely over the IT industry layoff cycle. I don't care to ever be in IT ever again. I loved the work, I absolutely loath the bureaucracy and the sheer maddening sea of middle managers who hit their "Peter Principle" three jobs ago.
 
AI can be a great tool for those competent enough to use it as such but is by no means a replacement for that competence
 
Back