1)It's slower than the competition, although cheaper; not worth it IMHO. This HDD is a better choice.ramonsterns said:A few things:
1) What's wrong with the HDD?
2) The card reader ends up being cheap when in combo with the HDD.
3) What's wrong with the Burner?
4) I trust MSi and this 460 touted better specs.
1)It's slower than the competition, although cheaper; not worth it IMHO. This HDD is a better choice.
2)That's if you buy it with the Seagate drive, which I don't recommend.
3)Nothing, just that you can get that Sony drive for slightly cheaper with free shipping. No real discernible performance difference either.
4)Better specs? It's just overclocked, and has a custom cooler, which this GTX 460 also shares, although the MSI is clocked higher. Still, IMHO it's not worth the $30 or so extra over the Gigabyte card, especially since you can OC the card yourself too. And from experience, Gigabyte is as good a brand as any, barring maybe eVGA, who're still king when it comes to reliability.
It's still upto you though.
@ramonsterns, the SpinPoint F3 has a large cache, only two 500GB platters (lower no. of platters = lower seek times) and a superbly-programmed drive controller, among other things, which help it eclipse other drives in performance. Check out some reviews, and see for yourself.
If you look at this review you'll see that the Set-up I recommended will out-perform that single GTX460 by a ton. They mention no issues with the card and they tested it through a ton of games. Because IMO the rig setup you have there isn't optimum for gaming with the budget you set.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/Radeon_HD_6850_CrossFire/
I don't like ATI/AMD cards. I don't feel the money saved is worth the headache later with the iffy drivers. Not going through *that* again, I tell you that.
For a video card as we discussed earlier with a 1440x900 resolution you won't be taking full advantage of your GTX 460, but as long as you put that left over money towards a new monitor you should be fine.
@Relic, the SpinPoint F3 is cheaper than the WD, and offers higher performance and larger capacity; I'm just sayin'. Also, this PSU is a higher efficiency, modular version of the 650TX, and it costs exactly the same as well, down to the rebate. Lastly, won't getting the 768MB version of the GTX 460, be better, since the OP won't be needing the 1GB VRAM at the resolution he intends to game at?
I already have a 22" monitor.
So you won't be gaming at 1440x900? If that's the case then no worries the 1GB will serve you well.
Then go with the XFX 750W PSU instead; it's essentially identical to the Cooler Master one, but modular.
RAM has no correlation or impact on performance at any resolution. VRAM does however.
Lower latencies don't make for any noticeable difference in performance. The only time lower latency RAM matters is when you'd be overclocking.