Nvidia announces 3GB variant of GeForce GTX 1060 for $199

That's the joke I was asking Steve about. Apparently some feel that the 1060 is not meant to be played on lessor settings as well.
I agree. I believe the 1060 3GB is meant for High settings at 1080p for upcoming AAA titles. I've heard before that game developers develop games to be played on high settings, the ultra settings are just "extras" for those with big budget hardware.
 
I believe the reference here might be:
Through the years, many of us have never owned a flagship card/monitor (or Phone, for that matter).
We've accepted the Game's recommendation for what super abilities need to be toned down, based upon our so Not flagship cards and played very well thank you. Each of us have Known that When we see the game played on a friend's computer, with a better and/or Newer card, we would get to see what we were Missing (at a high frame-rate), and we would kick ourselves for not getting "the good one".
Whether age, pocketbook, or just plain exhaustion from the upgrade-cycle, I've not yet had that "damn, I shoulda'" moment yet.
Meaningless post for many readers, but Might explain the discrepancy for what is Acceptable. The numerics and abilities can be impressive, but at the end of the day, did it Impact my enjoyment of the game.
 
Mate you need to read the article, this 1060 3 GB has 11% less CUDA cores. I guess Nvidia calling it a 1060 instead of a 1050 will get them extra sales with people believing they are getting full 1060 power.
It has 11% less than the 1060.... which still makes it faster than the 480 (at least on paper)... Once we have a real review and some benchmarks, we'll know for sure - but it looks like anyone who bought the 470/480 is gonna be pretty peeved....

They have no reason to be peeved, 470/480 does excellent in dx12 and vulkan, and thats what upcoming titles will use going forward.
So the AMD "does excellent" in 2 games (doom and hitman), a tech demo (ashes), and is behind in the other major dx 12 title (rotr) but is bested in all other dx11 titles?

I'm hoping for more games to support low level api's but right now there's no real reason to believe that doom's performance is going to be the norm going forward. Vulkan and dx12 are in their infancy and won't likely be the dominant choice for games prior to 2018 when new cards would likely be released. Until then the 1060 6gb is the strongest performer and the 480 4gb is the value leader.
 
It has 11% less than the 1060.... which still makes it faster than the 480 (at least on paper)... Once we have a real review and some benchmarks, we'll know for sure - but it looks like anyone who bought the 470/480 is gonna be pretty peeved....

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4tztue/gtx_1060_vs_rx_480_a_statsbased_analysis_with/

You also have multiple review channels like HardwareUnboxed that calculated the GTX 1060 at 7-8% faster. So yes, there is a very good chance that it will be slower than the RX 480.
 
I do wish you knew what you were talking about. My GTX 660 is fine for 1080p gaming. I can't help it if your gaming criteria for gaming is out the roof requiring a 1080. There is a reason crippled cards are being sold. There being sold for Gamers who can't afford all the cosmetics you cutting edge players are used to looking at.

Why do people insist that VRAM capacity isn't dictated by GPU power. Basically if you are aiming for a minimum of 60fps in modern games, then the 3GB model will be fine. You aren't going to be playing with settings that chew through VRAM if you are targeting high frame rates on this card.

Tell me cliffordcooley, why? Help me keep my sanity :D
to be honest almost every tech channel on youtube has recomannded the 4gb version of the gtx 960 ,
 
Maybe those still gaming on 720p tv's and those few in 3rd world nations with 720p monitors????
Only a few in 3rd world economies? Have you ever been to a 3rd world country? it would be obtuse to believe everything you see or read on your 4K displays that your Titan X renders. Most 3rd world economies have the very latest tech as well, by the tons, often costing far less than than the equivalent USD.

This is because they are awash in money. Seriously, Nigerian princes email me daily wanting to transfer huge sums. They're richer than us!
nice but the Nigerian scammer jokes are too old perhaps try not to embarrass yourself next time , I live in a third world country and we get every latest tech in the first week of the launch , and to be honest only small children who cant afford to buy a gaming rig by themselves play on outdated hardware
 
To be honest that means nothing. Here is one YouTuber that disagrees with that...
it happens that I own an MSI GTX 960 4GB version while monitoring the vram I found out that GTA 5 . witcher 3 exceed the 2 GB barrier and sitting at 2500-2900 mem usage , paying an extra 10 dollars is not that bad if you're going to get double the frame buffer size regardless if your gpu can use all of it or not
you shove your own opinion into people throats by saying no one should buy the 4gb version
 
it happens that I own an MSI GTX 960 4GB version while monitoring the vram I found out that GTA 5 . witcher 3 exceed the 2 GB barrier and sitting at 2500-2900 mem usage , paying an extra 10 dollars is not that bad if you're going to get double the frame buffer size regardless if your gpu can use all of it or not
you shove your own opinion into people throats by saying no one should buy the 4gb version

I think you will find that isn't what I am doing at all. I provided a detailed analysis on the subject, which is a lot more than you can say ;)

It is worth nothing that you don't actually know how much memory is being used on your 4GB model, the games are simply allocating up to 3GB of VRAM because they can. Claiming that the 4GB is a must based on your evidence is absurd, do some 2GB vs 4GB testing and then get back to us.

Practice what ??? English ?? it's my third language you probably suck at your own let alone another one

He was in no way referring to your English skills, the irony :)
 
I think you will find that isn't what I am doing at all. I provided a detailed analysis on the subject, which is a lot more than you can say ;)

It is worth nothing that you don't actually know how much memory is being used on your 4GB model, the games are simply allocating up to 3GB of VRAM because they can. Claiming that the 4GB is a must based on your evidence is absurd, do some 2GB vs 4GB testing and then get back to us.



He was in no way referring to your English skills, the irony :)

no thank you very much I took your advice on the detailed analysis 8gb ram vs 16gb I wont do it again trust me , I know you simply want people not to fall into marketing scams but sometimes you should consider forming your opinion on the near future and how much will the extra stuff get you
 
no thank you very much I took your advice on the detailed analysis 8gb ram vs 16gb I wont do it again trust me
Sounds like to me you are the exception that should have known how much memory you needed. Well at least now you do, and that's a great place to be. Either way that doesn't make Steve's review wrong or misguiding to the masses.
 
nice but the Nigerian scammer jokes are too old perhaps try not to embarrass yourself next time , I live in a third world country and we get every latest tech in the first week of the launch , and to be honest only small children who cant afford to buy a gaming rig by themselves play on outdated hardware
I live in one too. 1st world economy populations generally still tend to think we live in caves but that's understandable, they've never been to a 3rd world country and believe in the propaganda they see on TV. To be honest though, in places where it is poverty stricken, things are pretty dire.
 
I live in one too. 1st world economy populations generally still tend to think we live in caves but that's understandable, they've never been to a 3rd world country and believe in the propaganda they see on TV. To be honest though, in places where it is poverty stricken, things are pretty dire.
I guess our definition of "3rd World" are different. I've been all over Haiti in three visits and have been to Honduras as well. "3rd World" in my mind means a large portion of the population have dirt for floors.
 
I guess our definition of "3rd World" are different. I've been all over Haiti in three visits and have been to Honduras as well. "3rd World" in my mind means a large portion of the population have dirt for floors.
I live in Africa and I've seen almost all of it's countries and states. Mud huts with thatch roofs was the norm years ago. A rural man's wealth (women didn't count and still don't today) was based on the amount of cattle he owned, and in some African states it's still that way today.
 
Back