Nvidia hits 94% GPU market share as overall shipments surge 27%

midian182

Posts: 12,013   +183
Staff member
In brief: Jon Peddie Research has released its latest report on the state of the GPU market, and it's good news for the industry – especially Nvidia. There was a 27% increase in add-in board shipments last quarter, as Team Green's total share increased to 94%.

JPR writes that the global PC-based graphics AIB market reached 11.6 million in Q2 2025, jumping almost 30% compared to the previous quarter. Data center GPUs, meanwhile, also saw their shipments increase, rising 4.7% quarter-over-quarter.

Unsurprisingly, Nvidia's dominance in this area continues to grow at the expense of AMD. Team Red's share of the pie fell 2% to just 6% in Q2, while Nvidia's grew by the same amount to 94%. Intel's market share stayed at 0.0%.

Nvidia's hold on the graphics card market is reflected in the latest Steam survey, where it holds a nearly 75% share. And despite heavy criticism aimed at the cards, seven of the thirteen best-performing GPUs during August were from the Blackwell RTX 5000 series.

JPR also revealed that GPU shipments were above the 10-year average of 5.2%.

Dr. Jon Peddie, president of JPR, said that prices for midrange and entry-level cards dropped, while high-end AIB prices increased, and most retail suppliers ran out of stock, which he said is very unusual for the second quarter.

"We think it is a continuation of higher prices expected due to the tariffs and buyers trying to get ahead of that," he explained.

The report also notes that overall AIB attach rate in desktop PCs – the number of cards sold relative to the number of desktop PCs shipped – increased 2.3% to 154% during the quarter.

When it comes to desktop PC CPUs, the market increased 21.6% QoQ but was down 4.4% compared to the same period a year earlier. AMD's shipments were up 27%, while Intel's increased by 2%.

Peddie continued to emphasize the impact that tariffs are having on the market. "The upheaval and uncertainty over tariffs have not abated, making planning difficult or impossible for PC suppliers. Supply chains are being reconfigured every week, trying to offset the impact of the threats and a few cases of actual tariffs," he said. "Consumers are equally confused and worried, which will likely result in a pullback, further exacerbating the market. We don't see how the market can do anything but decline in such uncertain times."

Looking forward, JPR says that AIBs will have a compound annual growth rate of -5.4% from 2024 to 2028 and will reach an installed base of 163 million units by the end of the forecast period.

The RTX 5000 series only launched at the start of 2025, but there are plenty of rumors about the Super variants' arrival. Some say they could even launch at the end of this year, though that's a much smaller gap than 15 months between the first RTX 4000 card (RTX 4090 in October 2022) and the RTX 4000 Super series launch in January 2024. Meanwhile, AMD's UDNA cards are expected in late 2026 or early 2027.

Permalink to story:

 
If history is any indicator, people will apparently pay any price for their GPUs. Presumably, their YouTube views will have it paid for in a months’ time, furthering this insanity.
 
Young folks stuck (or choosing to) living with their parents while working means they typically don't have that big rent or mortgage payment soaking up all their disposable income.

So they buy overpriced consumer shyte instead.

Make rent $500 and a mortgage $1500 again, and have parents kick their kids out at 18 (not that I agree with this), and watch the consumer economy implode.
 
The Youtube tech channel bloviaters and the loud disgruntled rabble who insist they deserve front row seats for a handful of nickels are just so out of step with actual PC gaming enthusiasts.

No matter how much they try to distract people by the relentless focus on irrelevant talking points (ray tracing is so not worth it, ooh these frames are just fake, xx70 should actually be called xx60, oh look a couple of 12VHPWR cables burned and a bunch of other nonsense), people are finding out that it's just noise and can simply be ignored. A lot of people who actually drank the AMD GPU Koolaid don't make that mistake a second time.
 
So virus GPU shipments are growing faster then AMDs.

The 9060xt only came out recently and the 9060 is OEM only, meanwhile the 7900 series buyers have been left out to dry……again.

I think it’s a miracle AMD still has 6 percent.
 
Just shows 99% of the nose in forums about Nvidia is wasted. The general public don't give a toss, they heard from a friend of a friend that Nvidia is GOAT so will never consider AMD. AMD can't win this battle.
 
Prices should be getting jacked up in the near-future I expect. "Never give a sucker an even break".....LOL
 
Just shows 99% of the nose in forums about Nvidia is wasted. The general public don't give a toss, they heard from a friend of a friend that Nvidia is GOAT so will never consider AMD. AMD can't win this battle.
I would buy a AMD gpu if it beats everything Nvidia had to offer in terms of efficiency, performance in rasterization/ray tracing as well as a competitive or better upscaler and feature sets. I would personally pay more for it. Unfortunately AMD doesn't want to take chances on enthusiast gpu market and focus more on guaranteed maximum margins for minimum silicon allocation. What baffles me is why AMD is waiting to upgrade rdna 3.5 to an ai upscaler in the apu/pc handheld market until 2028. If Nvidia is focusing on software premium model more with every year AMD is dragging its feet in that regard imo.
Everyone mostly knows my stance on the blind spot of also not having the crown in the gpu market costs them free marketing for Nvidia 7800X3D/4090 and now 9800x3d/5090 as I predicted.
I would love to see AMD gpu flagship once more and for AMD fortify it's handheld gaming position of dominance before Nvidia is about to hadookan the x86 cpu business ( delayed to 2026 and to be determined).
 
At first I was surprised. Then not.

AMD has nothing that can match RTX 5080 performance levels. Even though many here, including me are disappointed with the RTX 5xxx series in terms of incremental performance gains, dodgy power delivery, awful drivers, and more. It seems this makes no difference to NV dominance.

The reasons have already been mentioned by others above. One thing I will repeat more or less is that AMD need to really get back into the highend GPU market.

Also while NV can get away with fake pricing, (now not such an issue.) AMD were daft to publish prices way lower than the reality, even now.

For GPUs AMD don't have "name/brand, value" NV does.

AMD need improved marketing stategies, a real high end alternative to NV, and push push with improved graphics/gaming techs.

If they do that, it will still take another gen, probably two for AMD to become an equally "go to brand," as NV.

If their GPUs were as good as their CPUs, they use the latest VRAM, they make memory simple by having great ties with motherboard makers, and just innovate more and more they would have a complete package for AMD builds. Good enthusiast grade desktops that can at the very least match an Intel/Nvdia enthusiast build, but for a better price...

Ahh what's the point. Just daydreaming I guess.
 
Back