Nvidia's GTC 2021 keynote was largely CGI and nobody noticed [Updated]

Again, I see no agenda here and from your first comment you are clearly having some beef with the author. You are being really unreasonable dude, very childish.

You should be glad that such troll posts are not all deleted from this comment thread.

"Third, another fluff pro nvidia article..." - this line makes zero sense and is just insulting to everyone here.
Title of the article:
Nvidia's GTC 2021 keynote was entirely CGI and nobody noticed


Not misleading at all.

Anyways, done with this.

You think what you want to think.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What some perceive as normal, the others do notice the bias.

The timing on those articles was very interesting and both camps came out and expressed their opinions.

Now, a little advice, dont confuse rabid fanbois with educated consumers that are capable of seeing beyond the illusions created by the marketing teams.

Some may perceive your posts as normal. Others notice the bias.

You're pathological like a Jehova's witness, and not just on this forum.
 
Title of the article:



Not misleading at all.

Anyways, done with this.

You think what you want to think.
The title of the article is normal. Nothing misleading. You are literally getting angry over nothing. There is nothing to think about, nobody here seems to understand your grief.

When everybody is telling you that you are wrong then maybe you should reflect on that a bit. The world is not that insane.
 
When everybody is telling you that you are wrong then maybe you should reflect on that a bit.
If that what the case, then yes, something to think about it, but that also applies to you.

The world is not that insane.
Currently? I have my doubts on that one.

Example, see how much effort all of you have placed because one simple post....
 
Now, a little advice, dont confuse rabid fanbois with educated consumers that are capable of seeing beyond the illusions created by the marketing teams.
Don't worry, I'm not. Everyone has their mild biases / preferences. But as I said, the long-term regulars here (8 years for me vs your 8 months) know full well who all the "characters" are (on both sides) including those who spend literally all day writing variations of "nVidia / Intel / AMD sux but I'm trying to dress that up to sound more intellectual than it is" or "liking" comments still sulking over GTX 970 4GB vs 3.5GB cards they never even owned. As for "useful advice", here's some:-

The CPU / GPU tribal thing sounds so utterly mind-blowingly childish to those of us who grew up in the pre-duopoly era, and have owned everything including Cyrix, Via, TI, UMC & SGS-Thomson for CPU's to Matrox, S3, 3dfx, Trident, Oak, Orchid, Tseng Labs, Number Nine (the one that displayed Beatles lyrics in the BIOS during boot-up), etc, for GPU's, long before some over-emotional kiddies turned Array Technology Inc vs Next Version into a shaking with fervor religious war... ;)
 
Don't worry, I'm not. Everyone has their mild biases / preferences. But as I said, the long-term regulars here (8 years for me vs your 8 months) know full well who all the "characters" are (on both sides) including those who spend literally all day writing variations of "nVidia / Intel / AMD sux but I'm trying to dress that up to sound more intellectual than it is" or "liking" comments still sulking over GTX 970 4GB vs 3.5GB cards they never even owned. As for "useful advice", here's some:-

The CPU / GPU tribal thing sounds so utterly mind-blowingly childish to those of us who grew up in the pre-duopoly era, and have owned everything including Cyrix, Via, TI, UMC & SGS-Thomson for CPU's to Matrox, S3, 3dfx, Trident, Oak, Orchid, Tseng Labs, Number Nine (the one that displayed Beatles lyrics in the BIOS during boot-up), etc, for GPU's, long before some over-emotional kiddies turned Array Technology Inc vs Next Version into a shaking with fervor religious war... ;)
Well written response, but there is one small flaw.

I am not a corporate fanboi, I am a pro-consumer fanboi and I will defend what is convenient to me as a customer.

Company X does some anti-consumer cr@p like what Nvidia does on a daily basis, I will call it out and avoid them.

Last point, I have been in the field for over 40 years, so I know very well that last paragraph that you wrote.
 
Don't worry, I'm not. Everyone has their mild biases / preferences. But as I said, the long-term regulars here (8 years for me vs your 8 months)
The fact that he's been here for 8 months isn't really all that relevant because 8 months is more than long enough to see who's who and what their attitudes are on TechSpot.

As for someone knowing what they're talking about, I also started here in 2013 but that.s also meaningless. I did a craptop write-up three years earlier on Tom's Hardware that TH ended up putting into Tom's Guide. Even at that time, I was already an old pro, having previously worked at Tiger Direct. I started using computers (one with a keyboard that is) when I was only six years old, did my first unassisted PC build in 1988 (when I was twelve) and haven't stopped since. That means my level of PC experience probably far exceeds that of many TechSpot charter members.

I was already a 4-year veteran on Tom's Hardware before I joined here and the same could be true about anyone on here, even a "rookie". I can always tell how tech-savvy someone is from their posts anyway and so I ignore how long they've been on TS because being a member of TS only shows the minimum amount of time that someone has been paying attention to computer tech, not their actual level of experience.
 
The fact that he's been here for 8 months isn't really all that relevant because 8 months is more than long enough to see who's who and what their attitudes are on TechSpot.

I ignored the 8 months point because as you so eloquently explained, is meaningless.

But her/him bringing that up as such seems to point to some self esteem issues or insecurities.

Anyways, it is very interesting how people seem to fixate on others that not necessarily agree or believe in what the already believe.
 
If that what the case, then yes, something to think about it, but that also applies to you.


Currently? I have my doubts on that one.

Example, see how much effort all of you have placed because one simple post....
Typical troll response: "look at how much my flaming is annoying you".

In the end all you did with these responses was to prove that Techspot mods were right in deleting some of your comments.

You gave zero arguments as to why this is a "biased" article and just continued acting like the world revolves around your conspiracy theory when everybody else tells you that you are wrong.
 
I don't understand the drama this time around either. Maybe a little clickbaity on the title. But only if you don't understand the word entirely was in reference to the renders for the CGI clip.
 
I ignored the 8 months point because as you so eloquently explained, is meaningless.

But her/him bringing that up as such seems to point to some self esteem issues or insecurities.

Anyways, it is very interesting how people seem to fixate on others that not necessarily agree or believe in what the already believe.
Well, hopefully, using myself as an example demonstrated the point. When I was a "rookie" on TechSpot, I was already a girzzled PC veteran and the idea that someone knew more than me just because they're been here longer is absolutely absurd. You and I talk back and forth a lot and I can tell that you know what you're talking about. I honestly never once looked at how long you've been here. I only now know because of his post.
 
Back