OpenAI's mysterious ChatGPT device is a $300+ doughnut-shaped smart speaker with moving parts

midian182

Posts: 11,804   +179
Staff member
Why it matters: The mysterious AI device being created by OpenAI and former Apple designer Jony Ive's LoveFrom studio has been revealed – and it sounds a bit weird. According to a new report, it will be a hockey-puck-sized smart speaker shaped like a doughnut. It will also have "moving parts that help give it personality" and cost between $300 and $400.

News of the device, whose journey began when OpenAI announced it was acquiring Ive's AI hardware startup io for $6.5 billion last year, comes from Bloomberg.

The publication writes that it will work like an everyday smart speaker, but it will actually be the "physical manifestation" of ChatGPT.

Because of the speaker's doughnut-like design and the fact it's battery-powered, users will be able to carry it around the home and place it in different locations with ease. It's said to be constructed from high-quality metal and have a premium look, which is to be expected for a smart speaker that costs up to $400.

Those strange-sounding moving parts will apparently move to show when the speaker is responding – a pair of fake lips that flap when it speaks would certainly add personality. There will also be lights that illuminate when it's listening. It's also expected to feature cameras and other sensors so it can provide visual information to the AI.

Another expected feature is the use of advanced AI models that allow the speaker to engage in free-flowing conversations with users and learn about them to tailor its responses. Bloomberg says the device will launch sometime in 2027.

It was reported last November that OpenAI had completed the first working prototype. Sam Altman called the screenless device "simple, beautiful, and playful," while reports said its cameras and microphones would give it spatial awareness and allow it to respond contextually.

Interestingly, Apple alleges in its trade secrets lawsuit that OpenAI misled one of Cupertino's manufacturing partners into performing its confidential metal-finishing technique by falsely suggesting Apple had approved it. OpenAI, for its part, said it is "building something entirely new and different from anything at Apple."

OpenAI plans to make more than just expensive smart speakers. There were reports of AI earbuds codenamed Sweetpea in January, though court filings later said the Ive-designed device is not wearable or in-ear. The company has since launched the $230 Codex Micro, a miniature keypad designed to control its Codex coding agent. Bloomberg says the speaker is intended to be the first in a family of devices, with OpenAI hoping to eventually build hardware capable of replacing today's smartphones.

Permalink to story:

 
That picture of Ive & Altman, beyond creepy. They must enjoy the Hershey Highway…

Yet another device that listens, monitors, transmits data, as if we need any more DARPA-designs in the privacy of our own homes.
 
Now, this is peak innovation :rolleyes:

Smart-speakers, earbuds, and keyboards—truly cutting-edge. Watch out, Apple, Sam & Co. are aggressively conquering the office supply aisle, disrupting peripheral tech, and bravely reinventing the 2015 Best Buy discount bin.

Groundbreaking stuff there Sammy!
 
The TechSpot School of Product Evaluation strikes again...

Product isn't released.
Nobody here has touched it.
Nobody knows its final capabilities.
Nobody knows how well it works.

Verdict: garbage. 🤣

Comparing this to a 2015 Alexa because they both contain a speaker is like saying the first iPhone wasn't interesting because BlackBerry already made phones.

The potential difference isn't the speaker...it's the intelligence behind it. A device capable of conversational reasoning, environmental awareness, memory and eventually carrying out multi step tasks is a very different concept from “Alexa, set a timer.”

Privacy is absolutely worth questioning. If something has cameras and microphones in your home, OpenAI needs to clearly explain what stays local, what gets transmitted, what gets stored and how users can disable it.

But calling an unreleased product “single use e waste” or a “2015 Best Buy discount bin device” before anyone even knows what it can actually do isn't analysis.

That's just deciding you hate something first and working backward toward an argument. O wait, this is the Techspot forums.

And the middle school sexual joke about Altman and Ive? Nothing says “take my technological analysis seriously” quite like that one.
 
OMG a genius move.

OpenAI is going to be insanely filthy rich 2 months from now!

Nah just kidding - they're probably going to crash & burn - soon.
Schadenfreude usually isn't my thing but I make an exception for OpenAI and their CEO.
 
The TechSpot School of Product Evaluation strikes again...

Product isn't released.
Nobody here has touched it.
Nobody knows its final capabilities.
Nobody knows how well it works.

Verdict: garbage. 🤣

Comparing this to a 2015 Alexa because they both contain a speaker is like saying the first iPhone wasn't interesting because BlackBerry already made phones.

The potential difference isn't the speaker...it's the intelligence behind it. A device capable of conversational reasoning, environmental awareness, memory and eventually carrying out multi step tasks is a very different concept from “Alexa, set a timer.”

Privacy is absolutely worth questioning. If something has cameras and microphones in your home, OpenAI needs to clearly explain what stays local, what gets transmitted, what gets stored and how users can disable it.

But calling an unreleased product “single use e waste” or a “2015 Best Buy discount bin device” before anyone even knows what it can actually do isn't analysis.

That's just deciding you hate something first and working backward toward an argument. O wait, this is the Techspot forums.

And the middle school sexual joke about Altman and Ive? Nothing says “take my technological analysis seriously” quite like that one.

Clearly you can't look at a photo with any discernment at all. That black and white "portrait" tells us everything we need to know about them, and this stupid "device".
 
Back