PC makers to rebel against Microsoft Windows at Consumer Electronics Show

The "chain" is broken.

People forget that MS Operating System releases are hit and miss. 95' sucked and 98' was better. 2000 crashed all the time and XP was better. Vista sucked and WIN7 was better. Win8 is another story.

The problem with MS is that they think they can do no wrong. Having a monopoly in desktop OS's they figured that whatever they did - people had to follow.

The "chains" that tied me to MS-Office got broken when they subjected the world to Office 2007 and the "ribbon". "Open Office" works just as well for my use and is FREE. No more M$Office licenses for me thank you.

Outside of the tower system that I run games on most of my computing (at home and at the office) is done on laptop/notebook computers with smart phones and tablets filling in the gaps. When I had extra ca$h burning a hole in my pocket this holiday season and I looked to getting a ultralight laptop or notebook computer I bought a Apple instead of a WIN8.x powered device.

I figured "why not Apple"? At the high end of the ultralight space they are competitive in price, performance and there were native versions of the software I use most often (and already had licenses for) that I could use with it.

Come to think of it, there really is no reason for me to ever purchase a MS product ever again.

This afternoon I have an "IT date" with some friends which have aging XP boxes that have self destructed. (both the desktop and laptop are sporting less than 1GB of ram and ~40GB of HD storage space) Unemployed and cashless they won't be purchasing a new computer device anytime soon. They have no idea where their install disks are (of if they even have any). My "cure" for them is a Ubuntu CD I downloaded and burned for them last night.

The free Ubuntu install comes with Firefox, a (claimed) MS Office compatible office suite and antivirus+firewall built in. The Ubuntu site claims multiple year support for the free OS. I'll bring a roll of packaging tape so I can attach the install CD to the side of their case so its not lost in case they ever have to reload it.

The silly thing is that once buying the same brand/model so you don't have to relearn everything no longer works or is broken people realize that there are other sometimes more attractive options available to for them to learn instead.

Given a choice MS products are rarely if ever peoples 1st choice (or a choice at all).
 
Why does this matter to Microsoft? If all of these machines are natively running Windows, does it matter if they're also running Android or Linux or a bakery? Microsoft still gets its payday, and remains the industry standard. Is Android really perceived as an alternative to a desktop OS? I dunno, seems kind of alarmist, to me.
It matters because it helps get exposure and acceptance. It would be hard to get exposure if the PCs were pure Android because if people aren't happy, they don't have a fallback (of windows).

If the Android use ramps up, suddenly they could have the option of pure Android. *Then* it is a problem for Windows.
 
Nugopabo, you must be trolling or uninformed. MS makes the most money from businesses. SQL. Office products. Azure. O365. Loads of other corporate stuff. If the latest version of Windows only came in a closed ecosystem version on Xbox hardware they could kiss goodbye to billions of dollars overnight. It would be a disaster. Unfortunately MS have made the Windows marketplace unattractive to develop for by forcing the metro ui to be separate from the desktop. If they had made them live side by side like it sounds may happen in Windows Threshold then they would be in a better place to promote their marketplace to developers but now with Android vms on the horizon, it may be too little too late.

Yucka, just wanted to let you know that I posted a reply to you yesterday which so far Techspot hasn't published. A rather lengthy one which is perhaps why they didn't post it. Either way, I'm still sticking with my position and I am neither trolling or uninformed and I was unimpressed with your rather mumble-jumble response. Thanks
 
NuguPabo, FYI, you have no unpublished pending posts and this thread contains no deleted posts from anyone (not yet, anyway).
 
MS took their userbase for granted. If they don't scramble and REALLY listen to what their users are telling them, they'll be history - at least insofar as home users are concerned. They'll still retain their share in the corporate world but that will erode too in the longer run.
 
NuguPabo, FYI, you have no unpublished pending posts and this thread contains no deleted posts from anyone (not yet, anyway).
What a relief! I can't say I am impressed by NugoPabo comments. Clearly he has never worked in a business environment were so much depends on legacy applications. For example Oracle at my workplace that will only work with an old version of Java.[/quote]
 
Yucka, just wanted to let you know that I posted a reply to you yesterday which so far Techspot hasn't published. A rather lengthy one which is perhaps why they didn't post it. Either way, I'm still sticking with my position and I am neither trolling or uninformed and I was unimpressed with your rather mumble-jumble response. Thanks

Sorry but your original post seemed crazy. MS money comes mainly from business and if they cut out the OEMs from producing computers with Windows on, it would all go terribly wrong. I can just imagine all the OEMs choosing their favourite flavour of Linux and pumping plenty of money into development while PCs become limited to a single flavour directly from MS. MS Laptops only. MS desktops only. Motherboard manufacturers going out of business. No more custom built Windows PCs. Unless Windows is sold separately but then thats what happens now.. No your post is definitely crazy and IF my response was "mumble jumble" then it was because your original post did my head in.
 
Back