Price spike hits Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus a week after launch, but value proposition remains

DragonSlayer101

Posts: 981   +14
Staff
Facepalm: Intel's new Arrow Lake Refresh chips launched to strong acclaim in March, with reviewers praising their significantly improved performance and superior value compared to last year's SKUs. However, the value proposition has just become slightly less compelling, as leading online retailers are now selling the processors at prices above their official MSRPs.

The Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus are selling well above MSRP on Newegg, Microcenter, B&H, Amazon, and other online retailers. For example, the 270K Plus is currently listed at $350 on Newegg, $50 above its official $300 MSRP, while the 250K Plus retails for $220, a full $20 higher than its original $200 asking price. The 250KF Plus, which lacks an integrated GPU, is priced at $200, up $15 from its $185 launch price.

Prices at other online stores are largely similar, making it unlikely that buyers will find these CPUs at Intel's recommended rates anytime soon. Still, even at the elevated prices, the new chips offer strong value for gamers seeking performance on a budget. Most reviewers agree that the 250K Plus is currently the best option at the $200 price point, while the 270K Plus is an excellent choice for those unwilling to spend $500 or more on a CPU.

The price hike comes just days after Intel executive David Feng confirmed that the company has raised CPU prices for OEMs to offset rising input costs amid ongoing supply constraints. AMD is also reportedly considering a similar move, with Japanese publication Nikkei reporting last week that the company has informed OEM partners of plans to implement a price increase in late March or early April.

Intel has already confirmed that Nova Lake CPUs will launch later this year, potentially delivering significant improvements in performance and efficiency. The new chips are designed to compete directly with AMD's X3D lineup, featuring up to 144MB of total L3 cache and a fully unlocked multiplier aimed at gamers and overclocking enthusiasts. The flagship Nova Lake SKU is rumored to offer up to 52 cores, including 16 Coyote Cove P-cores, 32 Arctic Wolf E-cores, and 4 low-power efficiency cores.

Permalink to story:

 
Meh, even at these prices they are still solid, I don't think people are going to complain, if they bump them any higher...yeah. If they sell well, then they most likely will increase the price sadly.
 
I have a 5090, 285k, 64GB DDR5 and 12 TB SSD storage.
Prices can run wild, but I did the right thing locking myself in on Black Friday.
 
Meh, AMD still better value as it's upgraded... This socket is a dead end.

Maybe Intel can fix that, next time...Maybe.
 
Waiting for Nova Lake or maybe finally switch to AMD with Zen6 and upgrade my 12700KF finally xD
If there won't be any major performance differences, the socket factor will be decisive. So it could be AMD maybe, since they don't change sockets as often as Intel. I don't know, we'll see :D
 
Waiting for Nova Lake or maybe finally switch to AMD with Zen6 and upgrade my 12700KF finally xD
If there won't be any major performance differences, the socket factor will be decisive. So it could be AMD maybe, since they don't change sockets as often as Intel. I don't know, we'll see :D

I thought Zen 6 was the end of the line for AM5 socket. Even so, it will be a huge upgrade from a 12700.
 
I have a 5090, 285k, 64GB DDR5 and 12 TB SSD storage.
Prices can run wild, but I did the right thing locking myself in on Black Friday.
No you locked yourself into another dead upgrade path by intel. I don't know why people think intel is the way to go when they offer 2 generations on a platform then force people to upgrade their motherboard to buy another upgrade from intel.
 
No you locked yourself into another dead upgrade path by intel. I don't know why people think intel is the way to go when they offer 2 generations on a platform then force people to upgrade their motherboard to buy another upgrade from intel.
Most people dont upgrade every 1-2 years.

There, mystery solved.
 
Most people dont upgrade every 1-2 years.

There, mystery solved.

Good thing I'm not most people....I upgrade bits and pieces when it makes sense. My wife was the last one of us to get a brand new build, and the only thing we've changed in the last 5 years was the CPU once and the GPU once.

I couldn't afford doing a new system every year or two.
 
Good thing I'm not most people....I upgrade bits and pieces when it makes sense. My wife was the last one of us to get a brand new build, and the only thing we've changed in the last 5 years was the CPU once and the GPU once.

I couldn't afford doing a new system every year or two.
Most people dont do new systems every 1-2 years either bud.

CPUs have LONG lifespans. Even GPUs dot tend to fall off on platforms liek Steam until they are 8+ years old.
Most people aren't buying K sku CPU's either.
Having socket longevity is more important than ever with hardware cost going out of control, and "budget" motherboards being $200+.
Right, so the people buying k skus and upgrading every year are a tiny niche....gee I wonder why they dont want to put int he effort to maintain a socket through multiple generations.

Most people dont upgrade every year or two. If cost is an issue, you KEEP YOUR OLD HARDWARE. you can easily get 6 years out of a CPU without issue and 10 years if you squeeze it.

Skylake was 8 year sold and look at the outcry from people still using them. Go to TPU, go to the ryzen 5000 owners club, and tell me how many of those sigs are using 500 series motherboards VS 4/300 series. Upgradeable motherboards dont matter to most people.
 
Most people aren't buying K sku CPU's either.
Having socket longevity is more important than ever with hardware cost going out of control, and "budget" motherboards being $200+.

No you locked yourself into another dead upgrade path by intel. I don't know why people think intel is the way to go when they offer 2 generations on a platform then force people to upgrade their motherboard to buy another upgrade from intel.

Because the majority of people don't buy desktop computers to play games and therefore don't need to upgrade. And it's not like the early 2000s when a 4 year upgrade cycle made a massive difference to compute performance compared to today (2x was very possible back then, no chance today in that timeframe.

I have a 10700K and have no reason to upgrade, mainly as I play older games that are more than happy with the hardware I'm using. Which I got for $250 thanks to discounting as 11th gen had launched.

My previous build was a 4670K from 2013 that I used in the UK until I left the country. I saw no reason to upgrade the CPU before I left but would probably have upgraded at the same time as I build my US PC.

Your mileage may vary, as it always does. The only CPU upgrade I ever did was going from a dirt cheap £50 Pentium E2140 to the £250 Q9650 quad core on LGA775, as I bought the Pentium wanting to see what the Q6600 replacement would be like (or if one was being launched) before jumping on what was an expensive component at the time.

Would I upgrade the CPU if I didn't need to swap motherboards as well? Possibly but I don't see the need when most games remain GPU limited and that's at high fps which I'm not that bothered by.
 
Back