Raid hard drives
- Thread starter Predict
- Start date
- Status
D
DelJo63
RAID is implemented on a per controller basis. All drives configured as a RAID array,
must be on the same controller -- therefore -- be of the same architecture.
SOME implementations allow differing sizes, BUT clearly a raid-1 (ie mirroring) requires
the active size to be the same. Raid-0 (stripping) may not care.
Consider carefully the implications of a failure on Raid-0; you must have a backup of
the total RAID, or you loose everything and start over.
Caveat Emptor.
must be on the same controller -- therefore -- be of the same architecture.
SOME implementations allow differing sizes, BUT clearly a raid-1 (ie mirroring) requires
the active size to be the same. Raid-0 (stripping) may not care.
Consider carefully the implications of a failure on Raid-0; you must have a backup of
the total RAID, or you loose everything and start over.
Caveat Emptor.
I have just installed my first RAID array within the last 2 weeks, and I must say, that article seems to have one error:
There is a performance increase using RAID 1.
As usual, I benchmark every possible performance increase in my computer. Having just installed RAID 1, and RAID 0, here's my results:
RAID 1:
No increase in write speed.
Significant increase in read speed.
Major reduction in seek times.
RAID0:
Slight increase in write speed
Major increase in read speed
Slight increase in seek times
These are in comparison to a single drive.
The website might be assessing write speeds, which would mean it mirrors my results.
To answer the original question:
I think it may depend on your RAID chip itself. Most would support different sized disks (or just plain different manufacturer). However, for RAID 0 or RAID1, you'd lose the extra space on the bigger disk (or might have to partition it separately to make use of it, depending on whether your RAID chip would allow that).
JBOD would accept all disks, and use them all. However, this is not a true RAID (come to think of it, RAID 0 is not a RAID at all neither). Not sure about performance difference in this setting.
As for one SATA and the other not.... I got a feeling its going to be tricky. On motherboards, I doubt it can be done. May be possible on a RAID card which accepts both SATA and PATA.
Bear in mind as well, that chances are, you'd need to reinstall Windows to get it to boot up on RAID.
Hope that helps.
There is a performance increase using RAID 1.
As usual, I benchmark every possible performance increase in my computer. Having just installed RAID 1, and RAID 0, here's my results:
RAID 1:
No increase in write speed.
Significant increase in read speed.
Major reduction in seek times.
RAID0:
Slight increase in write speed
Major increase in read speed
Slight increase in seek times
These are in comparison to a single drive.
The website might be assessing write speeds, which would mean it mirrors my results.
To answer the original question:
I think it may depend on your RAID chip itself. Most would support different sized disks (or just plain different manufacturer). However, for RAID 0 or RAID1, you'd lose the extra space on the bigger disk (or might have to partition it separately to make use of it, depending on whether your RAID chip would allow that).
JBOD would accept all disks, and use them all. However, this is not a true RAID (come to think of it, RAID 0 is not a RAID at all neither). Not sure about performance difference in this setting.
As for one SATA and the other not.... I got a feeling its going to be tricky. On motherboards, I doubt it can be done. May be possible on a RAID card which accepts both SATA and PATA.
Bear in mind as well, that chances are, you'd need to reinstall Windows to get it to boot up on RAID.
Hope that helps.
Well I installed windows a couple days on my comp so I dont have much to lose. If i were to go raid im still not sure about raid 1 or raid 0. All I want is faster load speeds in games. Also do the hard drives have to be the same? Both diff brand, size, and one is sata other is ata. Both same speed thow.
The guys says back up your still meanig it could erase ur hd? all i have to lose is some games.
The guys says back up your still meanig it could erase ur hd? all i have to lose is some games.
Diff brands/size probably won't be a huge problem. However, different connectors (SATA and PATA) will cause problems for sure.
Bear in mind that faster transfer speeds doesn't really mean much if the game loads tons of small files (like Windows does). In this case, a faster seek time would be more beneficial.
For best performance from your RAID drives, identical drives should be used. Its been suggested that if you're worried about failing drives, RAID1 with different manufacturers/batches would provide the best data protection.
I think a few RAID chips will preserve your data, while upgrading your configuration to RAID (Intel Matrix Storage comes to mind, on the ICH8R), but chances are you'd lose it. Backups don't hurt if you don't want to lose anything.
Bear in mind that faster transfer speeds doesn't really mean much if the game loads tons of small files (like Windows does). In this case, a faster seek time would be more beneficial.
For best performance from your RAID drives, identical drives should be used. Its been suggested that if you're worried about failing drives, RAID1 with different manufacturers/batches would provide the best data protection.
I think a few RAID chips will preserve your data, while upgrading your configuration to RAID (Intel Matrix Storage comes to mind, on the ICH8R), but chances are you'd lose it. Backups don't hurt if you don't want to lose anything.
D
DelJo63
One should expect this as that is the whole point of raid-0CMH said:
This is a side benefit of the multiplicity of HDs -- eg having two HDs will have
read performance like a single drive with two sets of arms+heads.
The controller will seek and read from the drive that has the arm+head closest to
the desired block. As long as there are consecutive read requests, the split reads continue to
increase read data performance. However, as soon as there is a write, both arms seek
and write in parallel and the read benefit starts all over again.
D
DelJo63
the explanation was intended for those less informed that might follow this thread
Raid
For speed AND security go the extra expense and purchase 4 identical drives,
then setup the Raid0,1 configuration.. That way you have the best of both raid configs.
From what I understand the drives must be of the same everything, i.e. the
speeds, size and manufacturer. I personally wouldn't waste my time trying
different hdds for Raid. Efficiency is the key here.
IF the possiblity of losing everything isn't a big issue for you than use the
Raid0 config. If you want security in Keeping everything then use the
Raid1 config.
If you can afford it do the Raid0,1 (4 identical drives). You may get away
with 2 sata and 2 pata, but then you would lose the speed factor. Keep it
all in the groove, stay identical.
For speed AND security go the extra expense and purchase 4 identical drives,
then setup the Raid0,1 configuration.. That way you have the best of both raid configs.
From what I understand the drives must be of the same everything, i.e. the
speeds, size and manufacturer. I personally wouldn't waste my time trying
different hdds for Raid. Efficiency is the key here.
IF the possiblity of losing everything isn't a big issue for you than use the
Raid0 config. If you want security in Keeping everything then use the
Raid1 config.
If you can afford it do the Raid0,1 (4 identical drives). You may get away
with 2 sata and 2 pata, but then you would lose the speed factor. Keep it
all in the groove, stay identical.
- Status
Similar threads
