Repair shop calls Nvidia's RTX 5090 Founders Edition a disaster in design

[midian182]

Facepalm: Owning an RTX 5090 might be some gamers' dream, but it could turn into a nightmare: a famed repair specialist has branded the design of the Founders Edition consumer Blackwell card one of the worst in the history of GPUs.

Computer repair shop and popular YouTube channel Northridge Fix has made plenty of headlines over the years, many of them related to the well-documented RTX 4090 melting power cable issues.

In a recent video, the channel examined an RTX 5090 that was sent in after it stopped working following modification with a custom water block.

According to the technician, a customer had brought in two RTX 5090 graphics cards for repair after both stopped working following water block installations. One of them – an Asus model – was successfully revived by reverting to the stock cooler. The Founders Edition, however, turned into a painful case study in over-engineering.

The technician's chief complaint centered on Nvidia's decision to make the 5090 Founders Edition modular, splitting the GPU into multiple interconnected parts that rely on delicate connectors instead of a unified PCB layout.

He explained that the card's PCIe connector is attached to the main board via a small, "very fragile FPC (flexible printed circuit) connector." During disassembly, it became clear that this connector is not designed to tolerate repeated removals or physical stress; one damaged or misaligned pin can prevent the entire card from outputting an image.

"The 5090 is a very heavy card," he noted, "and when you start adding fragile joints between major components, you're just asking for trouble."

Inspecting the card under a high-powered microscope, the repair expert discovered that one of the FPC connector's pins had been bent and another had snapped completely, likely during the water block installation process. This single broken pin was enough to stop the card from functioning, despite all voltage rails measuring correctly.

The biggest problem came when trying to find a replacement for the connector. After sourcing multiple electronics suppliers, no direct or compatible replacement part could be found.

"What's the point of designing it in two pieces if you can't buy the connector that joins them?" the technician asked. "If one pin goes bad, the whole GPU is dead, and there's nothing you can do about it."

Also highlighted was the card's unnecessarily complex internal structure; the teardown process required dealing with numerous screws, brackets, and small components, each introducing another possible failure point. The presenter likened the situation to plumbing: "The more joints you have, the more likely you'll get a leak." By comparison, older GPU designs with a single, solid PCB were far more robust and easier to service.

The technician's conclusion was to avoid the RTX 5090 Founders Edition at all costs, especially if you plan to modify or water-cool it. "If it's not broken, don't fix it," he warned. "The old-style GPUs worked just fine – why change something that didn't need changing?"

In the end, the technician returned the GPU casing to the customer and left the card unrepaired, declaring it unfixable without a replacement connector.

Permalink to story:

Repair shop calls Nvidia's RTX 5090 Founders Edition a disaster in design

 

[OortCloud]

NVidia (like Apple) don't want you to repair or modify their products. They want them to be thrown in a landfill once they stop working and for you to buy another one. I guarantee they will give zero consideration to this article and will strive to make the disassembly or repair as difficult as they think they can get away with.

 

[Squid Surprise]

I love the “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” but the only reason it didn’t work was because the user tried to modify it!!

Maybe listen to your own advice? Why would Nvidia and their resellers want you to modify their card when they can sell you a “pre-modified” one for more?

 

[Lisa III]

It is too small for the heat load as well.

 

[bviktor]

I love the “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” but the only reason it didn’t work was because the user tried to modify it!!

Maybe listen to your own advice? Why would Nvidia and their resellers want you to modify their card when they can sell you a “pre-modified” one for more?

The user tried to install a better cooler, yes.

 

[GTvon]

What possible incentive could he have for not wanting people to buy cards today's company can fix? Oh yeah his company can't fix them. Lol The grapes must be sour if you cannot reach them.
I have never had to have a card repaired anyway If it's not good I send it back and get a good one it's not like they start falling apart after running for 6 months in the computer. I think he took one apart and broke it and then couldn't fix it and embarrassed himself and had to lash out at someone.

 

[Squid Surprise]

The user tried to install a better cooler, yes.

And they broke a pin doing it… I suspect Nvidia (or Asus, MSI, etc) would have said, “the supplied cooler was sufficient, if you wanted a better one, they’re for sale for a couple hundred extra”

 

[bviktor]

And they broke a pin doing it… I suspect Nvidia (or Asus, MSI, etc) would have said, “the supplied cooler was sufficient, if you wanted a better one, they’re for sale for a couple hundred extra”

A pin that is completely unnecessary, along with the connector, along with the whole stupid riser board that you don't see on any other GPU, yes. That was the whole point of the very short video, which you apparently didn't watch, let alone comprehend.

The whole purpose of riser boards is to connect a GPU in a different angle or from a distance, usually due to space constraints in mini cases. Typically it is used to place the GPU in parallel to the mobo instead of the normal perpendicular position, e.g.:

But in the case of the 5059 FE, it serves no purpose whatsoever, it's there for the sake of being there, you still install it in the same perpendicular position in the same PCI-E slots. And to begin with, you don't install the riser inside the GPU, what's the point of that, really? You need it between the GPU and the mobo's slot. Mindblowingly stupid on so many levels. It serves one purpose, and one only: being a possible point of failure.

Hence the video.

 

[bviktor]

What possible incentive could he have for not wanting people to buy cards today's company can fix? Oh yeah his company can't fix them. Lol The grapes must be sour if you cannot reach them.
I have never had to have a card repaired anyway If it's not good I send it back and get a good one it's not like they start falling apart after running for 6 months in the computer. I think he took one apart and broke it and then couldn't fix it and embarrassed himself and had to lash out at someone.

The incentive is warning customers to avoid horsecr@p products. They have enough work without NV making purposefully broken designs.

 

[Squid Surprise]

A pin that is completely unnecessary, along with the connector, along with the whole stupid riser board that you don't see on any other GPU, yes. That was the whole point of the very short video, which you apparently didn't watch, let alone comprehend.

The whole purpose of riser boards is to connect a GPU in a different angle or from a distance, usually due to space constraints in mini cases. Typically it is used to place the GPU in parallel to the mobo instead of the normal perpendicular position, e.g.:

But in the case of the 5059 FE, it serves no purpose whatsoever, it's there for the sake of being there, you still install it in the same perpendicular position in the same PCI-E slots. And to begin with, you don't install the riser inside the GPU, what's the point of that, really? You need it between the GPU and the mobo's slot. Mindblowingly stupid on so many levels. It serves one purpose, and one only: being a possible point of failure.

Hence the video.

If you modify something and break part of it… it means you didn’t modify it properly.
Complaining that the card wasn’t designed properly (aka, designed so that it was harder to modify) is simply foolish.
Nvidia doesn’t care if you break their card when modifying it - they (and virtually every other company on earth) void their warranty if you try and modify their hardware.
You want a better cooler? Buy one of their 3rd party vendor versions with them.

 

[RaXelliX]

If you modify something and break part of it… it means you didn’t modify it properly.
Complaining that the card wasn’t designed properly (aka, designed so that it was harder to modify) is simply foolish.
Nvidia doesn’t care if you break their card when modifying it - they (and virtually every other company on earth) void their warranty if you try and modify their hardware.
You want a better cooler? Buy one of their 3rd party vendor versions with them.

So disassembling an FE cooler to for example change the thermal paste and accidentally breaking one of the ultra thin small pins is considered modifying now?

That's a lazy excuse for a poor and overly complicated design. AIB's have shown that there is no need for such elaborate contraptions, but the existence of AIB cards is not a valid excuse to produce complicated and hard to disassemble FE designs.

Consumer electronics need to be serviceable with a single tool (preferably included in the package) along with readily available disassembly schematics. No random torx screws. No glue and no one time use fragile cables.

 

[Squid Surprise]

So disassembling an FE cooler to for example change the thermal paste and accidentally breaking one of the ultra thin small pins is considered modifying now?

Yes - it does.

That's a lazy excuse for a poor and overly complicated design. AIB's have shown that there is no need for such elaborate contraptions, but the existence of AIB cards is not a valid excuse to produce complicated and hard to disassemble FE designs.

Why?

Consumer electronics need to be serviceable with a single tool (preferably included in the package) along with readily available disassembly schematics. No random torx screws. No glue and no one time use fragile cables.

Says who?

 

[RaXelliX]

Yes - it does.

No it's not. It's maintenance. Modifying would be soldering a new shunt resistor etc.
Even installing a new cooler is not modifying as long as it's not permanent.

Why?

Because it isn't. FE is useless. Aside from look it doesn't do anything better than AIB's. It doesn't cool better.

Says who?

The unsilent majority.

 

[Squid Surprise]

No it's not. It's maintenance. Modifying would be soldering a new shunt resistor etc.
Even installing a new cooler is not modifying as long as it's not permanent.

Agree to disagree - the VAST majority of GPU owners don’t touch their cards.

Because it isn't. FE is useless. Aside from look it doesn't do anything better than AIB's. It doesn't cool better.

Agreed - so buy one of the AIB if you need something better. Modify at your own risk.

The unsilent majority.

Refer back to my first sentence - the VAST majority do not modify their cards - or anything they purchase.

 

[harm9963]

Pull the CORE ,use a donor card , is the only way to go ,spending that kind of $ , or use someone else with more expertise like Northwestrepair .

 

[RaXelliX]

Agree to disagree - the VAST majority of GPU owners don’t touch their cards.

That was not the question. The question was that is the user at fault for trying to disassemble their card.

Agreed - so buy one of the AIB if you need something better. Modify at your own risk.

Most do. Also because FE availability is bad.

Refer back to my first sentence - the VAST majority do not modify their cards - or anything they purchase.

That's not the point. Imagine of the same argument was used for cars. Since most people dont change their car tires or oil then should we tolerate sealed and unserviceable products?
There are likely many examples of "most users never do this". Yet it still exists because it's common sense.

This comes back to the right to repair argument. As electronics become more expensive people upgrade less often. Thus these products need to be user serviceable to extend their life span and avoid pointless e-waste piling up.

Otherwise we become a helpless society of sissies where no one knows how anything works and need to send everything to official repair centers where it is then thrown in the bin and replaced with a new unit. Further increasing the waste.

I even ran into a situation where the official repair center refused to service my product. This was not just about user ability anymore. If an official repair says they cant fix it without destroying it in the process then something is very wrong.

Thankfully due to legislative changes and public shaming it's slowly changing and electronics are becoming easier to disassemble. Some companies are leading by example.

 

[Squid Surprise]

That was not the question. The question was that is the user at fault for trying to disassemble their card.

Most do. Also because FE availability is bad.

That's not the point. Imagine of the same argument was used for cars. Since most people dont change their car tires or oil then should we tolerate sealed and unserviceable products?
There are likely many examples of "most users never do this". Yet it still exists because it's common sense.

This comes back to the right to repair argument. As electronics become more expensive people upgrade less often. Thus these products need to be user serviceable to extend their life span and avoid pointless e-waste piling up.

Otherwise we become a helpless society of sissies where no one knows how anything works and need to send everything to official repair centers where it is then thrown in the bin and replaced with a new unit. Further increasing the waste.

I even ran into a situation where the official repair center refused to service my product. This was not just about user ability anymore. If an official repair says they cant fix it without destroying it in the process then something is very wrong.

Thankfully due to legislative changes and public shaming it's slowly changing and electronics are becoming easier to disassemble. Some companies are leading by example.

If you buy a new car and destroy the engine because you tried to repair it yourself, do you think it would be covered by warranty?!?

Yes, it’s nice to have something that is easy to fix but… you need to get someone reliable to do it for you if you can’t do it yourself. If THAT person / company breaks it, THEY pay for a new one…

If you are spending $2500 on a GPU and break it while trying to modify it… you are at fault!

 

[RaXelliX]

If you buy a new car and destroy the engine because you tried to repair it yourself, do you think it would be covered by warranty?!?

Yes, it’s nice to have something that is easy to fix but… you need to get someone reliable to do it for you if you can’t do it yourself. If THAT person / company breaks it, THEY pay for a new one…

If you are spending $2500 on a GPU and break it while trying to modify it… you are at fault!

This is not about the buyer breaking his card and then complaining that Nvidia refused to fix it under warranty. Why do you think he sent his card to Northridge Fix instead?
Obviously he paid for the repair out of his own pocket to someone far more qualified.

This is what right to repair is about. it is not about making unsubstantiated or fraudulent claims to the official manufacturer. This is about people and repair shops being able to repair consumer electronics without destroying them in the process because the manufacturer has made them difficult or downright impossible to repair because of design and because replacement parts are not available.

And no. The fact that better AIB alternatives exist does not mean that we should not point out Nvidia's FE design as bad and not demand better from them. They dont get a pass simply because alternatives exist. The user has an expectation that whatever model he buys - be it FE or AIB is reasonably easy to disassemble and reassemble.

 

[Squid Surprise]

This is not about the buyer breaking his card and then complaining that Nvidia refused to fix it under warranty. Why do you think he sent his card to Northridge Fix instead?
Obviously he paid for the repair out of his own pocket to someone far more qualified.

This is what right to repair is about. it is not about making unsubstantiated or fraudulent claims to the official manufacturer. This is about people and repair shops being able to repair consumer electronics without destroying them in the process because the manufacturer has made them difficult or downright impossible to repair because of design and because replacement parts are not available.

And no. The fact that better AIB alternatives exist does not mean that we should not point out Nvidia's FE design as bad and not demand better from them. They dont get a pass simply because alternatives exist. The user has an expectation that whatever model he buys - be it FE or AIB is reasonably easy to disassemble and reassemble.

Northbridge Fix was therefore responsible for the replacement… buyer was smart

 

[RaXelliX]

Northbridge Fix was therefore responsible for the replacement… buyer was smart

They didn't break it. It was broken, but the owner did not know why. Hence why it was sent to them. Northridge found out why - it was Nvidia's stupid FE design and it's fragile PCIe connector on the addon board. A connector for which no replacements are sold.

 

[GTvon]

The incentive is warning customers to avoid horsecr@p products. They have enough work without NV making purposefully broken designs.

It sounds like you are their target customer. I on the other hand see right through it.