Researchers beam energy from a moving aircraft to test space solar power

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,416   +73
Staff
Forward-looking: Beaming solar energy from space could address several drawbacks of today's ground-based solar technology. Organizations around the world are developing ways to deploy orbital solar farms in the coming decades – including a Virginia-based company that recently beamed energy to solar panels from an airplane.

The successful test is a proof-of-concept for Overview Energy's plans to deliver solar energy to Earth from satellites. The Northern Virginia startup hopes to conduct orbital tests and begin commercial operations within the next few years.

Using an array of lasers and cooling systems, researchers transmitted energy to ground-based solar panels from a Cessna Caravan flying 5 kilometers (3.1 miles) above the ground. A battery simulated the solar panels a satellite would use, while a laser shelf and modules converted energy into light. An optical assembly continuously tracked the ground arrays to maintain precise laser alignment from the moving aircraft.

Overview Energy plans to conduct a low Earth orbit test in 2028 and launch its first orbital solar farm to an altitude of 36,000 kilometers (22,000 miles) in 2029 or 2030. By the early 2030s, the company hopes to deliver more than a gigawatt of energy around the clock to locations anywhere on the planet.

The test closely mirrors an experiment conducted by Japan Space Systems in late 2024, in which a jet flying at roughly 700 kilometers per hour (over 400 mph) beamed energy to a ground-based antenna using beamformed microwaves.

Like Overview Energy, JSS ran its test at an altitude of 5 kilometers and plans to deploy satellites at 36,000 kilometers. However, the Virginia team used equipment largely identical to what it intends to launch into space, while JSS does not expect to deploy its final satellite systems until the 2040s.

Meanwhile, California startup Reflect Orbital is pursuing a different approach, developing a constellation of 57 satellites designed to concentrate and direct solar energy to Earth from just 600 kilometers above the surface. The company plans to launch its first satellite this spring.

Beaming solar energy from space offers two major advantages over conventional ground-based panels. First, relaying beams between satellites allows energy to reach receivers at night, enabling continuous, 24/7 power generation. Second, satellites can collect significantly more solar energy without interference from Earth's atmosphere.

Key challenges remain, including efficient energy conversion, satellite coordination, and preventing the buildup of space debris.

If these hurdles can be overcome, researchers in the UK estimate that orbital solar power could supply up to 80% of Europe's energy needs by 2050.

Permalink to story:

 
Uh oh...didn't anyone see the Bond movie "Die Another Day". This could be a precursor to that LOL
 
According to an analysis with Gemini, the whole system's theoretical maximum total efficiency under absolute ideal conditions is approximately 30%. This is calculated as follows: 50% solar panel efficiency in space, 85% DC-to-microwave conversion in space, 90% transmission through the atmosphere, 85% microwave-to-DC conversion on Earth, and 95% DC-to-AC conversion on Earth. The total cost per gigawatt (for a 10 km rectenna on the ground, construction, and sending equipment to space) is approximately $50 billion!

However, the real efficiency will not reach this theoretical maximum; for example, solar panels in space operate at 35% efficiency rather than the assumed 50%.

Solar panels on Earth have better efficiency and do not cost $50 billion per gigawatt. Personally, I doubt that there will be only 10% loss within the atmosphere. The US Army has a microwave weapon (the Active Denial System, operating at ~95 GHz, not 2.45/5.8 GHz, at an energy density of 50 kW/m²) with an effective range of under 500 meters. While most of the atmosphere from geostationary orbit is thin, the dense part at the bottom is several kilometers thick. With low power density at less than 1 W/m², I suspect that with a 1 km diameter antenna in space and a 10 km rectenna on Earth, the realistic efficiency for the travel part would be closer to 50% with clouds and 70% without clouds, rather than the 90% transmission that Gemini calculated (I asked it to do the full math, with consideration for oxygen, water, etc., and it calculated 90%) for microwaves at 5.8 GHz or 2.45 GHz.

Thus, to me the realistic total efficiency of the system ranges from 10% (with clouds and non-optimal settings) to 17% (without clouds and optimal settings). Another important factor is that solar panels in space produce electricity for roughly twice as long as solar panels on Earth, but they only last half as long (~15 years in space versus ~30 years on Earth). So, basically, we have better efficiency and lower costs on Earth, but more available space in space, if we ignore the 10 km of rectenna on the ground. However, we cannot ignore this, so space loses 3-0. It needs a score of at least 1-2 to become competitive.
 
Last edited:
This project is just too crazy, and is likely created by someone more interested in making a living off research funds, than actually achieving something.

Its complexity and cost are such, the result will never see any practical application.
 
sQ9pcYqJCi3NKC4AasDVrL-970-80.jpg.webp
 
This project is just too crazy, and is likely created by someone more interested in making a living off research funds, than actually achieving something.

Its complexity and cost are such, the result will never see any practical application.

Tbf, power schemes like this were theorized as far back as the 70s. Hell, SimCity 2000 predicted Microwave power in the 2020s.

The main benefit is you get (in theory) a higher efficiency out of solar, without that pesky thing called "nighttime", which is why it's fairly attractive if the technical hurdles can be overcome.

That being said...SimCity 2000 had a disaster scenario called "Beam Dish Miss", since this is basically also a James Bond superweapon.
 
Concerning the growing concern with existing the space junk clutter, this will put that problem on steroids!

What effect will it have on climate and ecosystems from all the solar blocking it will create?

And what will be the impact on health and environment and of all those targeted energy beams penetrating the earth's atmosphere?

And what about the interference with electronics and communication?

I can see lots of problems with this technology in the future.
 
Back