Roku and TCL face lawsuit over software updates that allegedly brick smart TVs

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,010   +58
Staff
In a nutshell: A lawsuit filed in federal court in Southern California is putting a spotlight on what can happen when smart TV software updates fail. The case targets Roku and TCL – longtime partners in the connected TV space – and focuses on Roku's operating system, which powers TCL's smart TVs. According to the complaint, the software has led to repeated failures instead of improving performance.

The lawsuit alleges that a series of updates pushed to certain Roku-powered TVs introduced recurring issues that, in some cases, rendered the devices unusable. The models named include Roku Select Series and Roku Plus Series sets, along with TCL's 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-series TVs running Roku OS.

The filing describes repeated problems tied to firmware updates, not isolated glitches. Reported problems include TVs freezing mid-use, getting stuck in restart loops, losing picture output, or failing to turn on entirely. The complaint characterizes these updates as "repetitively defective," a term that points to ongoing issues rather than a single faulty release.

The case centers on how those updates were handled. The plaintiff, Terri Elise, claims the companies continued to push software despite mounting complaints from users experiencing system failures.

"Despite consumers' persistent complaints of repeated system failures, often leaving their TVs completely inoperable, defendants offer no recourse," the lawsuit states. "This is inconsistent with representations made in express warranties, which promise to repair, correct or otherwise remediate the software defect."

Roku, in a statement, said, "We believe the claims are meritless." TCL declined to comment.

The complaint also points to a broader issue in connected devices. Smart TVs today operate more like embedded computing systems than traditional displays, with tightly integrated software, drivers, and cloud services. That integration allows for frequent updates and new features, but it also creates a single point of failure when something breaks.

Unlike smartphones or PCs, where users often have more flexibility to delay or roll back updates, many smart TVs automatically install new firmware. That helps keep devices consistent, but it also limits recovery options when an update fails.

User reports referenced in the lawsuit describe similar issues. Online posts describe TVs failing shortly after updates, with issues ranging from blacked-out screens to disrupted connectivity. One user wrote, "I was watching my TV and it just stopped showing pictures," while another described a set that would intermittently shut off or lose display output following software changes.

Other posts reference forced updates that disabled key features or failed during installation, leaving the system in a broken state. Reports of similar problems date back at least two years, matching the timeline described in the complaint.

For developers and engineers, the situation highlights the importance of safeguards like staged rollouts, system recovery modes, and fallback firmware. Without those safeguards, a failed update can effectively brick a device.

The lawsuit is still in its early stages, and the number of affected users has not yet been determined. It seeks a jury trial along with damages and other relief for those included in the proposed class.

Permalink to story:

 
Back in 2016 I won a TLC 50" TV after entering into a $25 raffle. $25 for a 50" TV, not too bad if you ask me.

When I first got the TV it ran great. As the years went on it became more sluggish, TV apps (such as Netflix) took a long time to load. Running closed caption would more often than naught (I'd say 75% of the time) cause the app using CC to crash or the TV to hang or simply just restart. Not even 5 years after having the TV there were apps that wouldn't even install on it anymore because they were no longer supported on that TV model.

I ended up resorting to plugging in a Roku stick into the TV's USB and used that instead of the built in software. The Roku stick is just as old or older than the TV and it ran every app without issues, never ran into CC problems, I could install any TV app without any problems.

What I learned is, I wouldn't personally spend any of my actual money on a TLC TV. If the one I got became so slow and shitty after a handful of years, I wouldn't waste my time or money on buying any other TLC TV. The TV itself that I have hasn't been used for several years now and I don't miss it, it just sits in basement in a backroom and no one cares about it.
 
Back in 2016 I won a TLC 50" TV after entering into a $25 raffle. $25 for a 50" TV, not too bad if you ask me.

When I first got the TV it ran great. As the years went on it became more sluggish, TV apps (such as Netflix) took a long time to load. Running closed caption would more often than naught (I'd say 75% of the time) cause the app using CC to crash or the TV to hang or simply just restart. Not even 5 years after having the TV there were apps that wouldn't even install on it anymore because they were no longer supported on that TV model.

I ended up resorting to plugging in a Roku stick into the TV's USB and used that instead of the built in software. The Roku stick is just as old or older than the TV and it ran every app without issues, never ran into CC problems, I could install any TV app without any problems.

What I learned is, I wouldn't personally spend any of my actual money on a TLC TV. If the one I got became so slow and shitty after a handful of years, I wouldn't waste my time or money on buying any other TLC TV. The TV itself that I have hasn't been used for several years now and I don't miss it, it just sits in basement in a backroom and no one cares about it.
A TV should be purchased for the panel quality… and possibly for connectivity (multiple hdmi 2.1, etc)… just like a computer, the software/OS will become obsolete within a few years.

No one needs a smart TV - that’s just a gimmick companies have foisted on us in order to make us replace our TVs every few years instead of every 15-20 (or more).

Buy a fire stick/roku/Apple TV for much cheaper every few years if you need “smart”. While they also eventually get slower/obsolete with age, they’re a lot easier and cheaper to replace.

Your actual TV never needs to connect to the internet - EVER! If there actually is a vital firmware update (highly unlikely, but you never know), you can flash it via USB…

Over the last couple of years, TCL actually has some fantastic TVs… the QM8K and QM8L are very good for their price points… as is their flagship… just don’t connect them to the net.
 
Last edited:
I believe the culprit is Roku, they love pushing customers to upgrade to new devices. They rendered certain Roku model devices unusable by having some apps not work on older models, meanwhile I have an even older Amazon Firestick and it still works with everything.
 
Last edited:
Alas, DP is virtually non-existent in TVs… too bad as it’s superior to HDMI… also, try buying an AVR with DP to connect to it, even if you found one!
Well the new HDMI is theoretically better than DP, but that's not the point. To take advantage of allmof HDMIs features I have to be running a specific set of hardware and software. You may have picked up on this in passing, but im a Linux guy so I can't take advantage of all of HDMIs features. And while im not an open source elitist, I really just want an OS that gets the f*** out of my way. People don't realize what a pain in the *** windows is until you don't have it bothering you for awhile. Luckily, I have a plex server for media content, but all my smart TVs are connected via ethernet and I have them blocked from accessing anything outside my network in my router
 
Last edited:
The core problem is that smart TVs borrowed the update model from smartphones without borrowing any of the recovery infrastructure.

Roku's entire response being we believe the claims are meritless is funny when the user forum posts they're going to have to address in court are things like my TV just stopped showing pictures. That's not a complex technical dispute. That's a television that doesn't work after an automatic update the user couldn't decline.
 
Wasn't it a few years ago, Apple pushed an update to phones that slowed them down to "improve the battery life"? And some people just said screw it and bought a new one.
Looks like TCL is doing a similar thing but BRICKING the device.
Oh how I long for the days of DUMB TV's, DUMB appliances, DUMB cars.
Yeah, it's convenient sometimes to have the tech in things, but, it comes with a cost.
If the firmware is updated, it can BRICK the device if there isn't a built in safeguard to
reject the update and go back to the last known working version.
 
I like watching the top ten TV's not to buy. I'm sure this will make the next list. I use Roku boxes and have had no problems. I like Roku's interface much more than Samsung's
 
No doubt all these "updates" are designed mostly to more-efficiently harvest your data, and feed you more ads. Anyone using a smart TV needs their head examining. Boycott them all. Wait for dumb TV's to make a comeback. Or just read a book, go for a walk, have sex.
 
I was facing this dilemma two years ago. I needed a new TV. My 1980's CRT telly finally gave up. At that time I could not find a non-smart one on the market (apart from a handful of bare bones basic monitors for corporate presentations) and I was trying to find the answer to my question. Would a smart TV refuse to work if I didn't allow it to connect to the internet? I couldn't get anyone to answer the question. I ended up buying one and didn't allow it access. Guess what. It works! And there hasn't been a plague of locusts and I don't even get annoying popups like Microsoft does. The only thing is I have noticed sometimes the power/standby light sometimes flashes in the middle of the night. I freaks out the dog but otherwise its business as usual.
 
I was facing this dilemma two years ago. I needed a new TV. My 1980's CRT telly finally gave up. At that time I could not find a non-smart one on the market (apart from a handful of bare bones basic monitors for corporate presentations) and I was trying to find the answer to my question. Would a smart TV refuse to work if I didn't allow it to connect to the internet? I couldn't get anyone to answer the question. I ended up buying one and didn't allow it access. Guess what. It works! And there hasn't been a plague of locusts and I don't even get annoying popups like Microsoft does.
Exactly - no need for the net on your TV…

The only thing is I have noticed sometimes the power/standby light sometimes flashes in the middle of the night. I freaks out the dog but otherwise it’s business as usual.
A piece of black tape fixes that :)
 
I typically buy Vizio. Never had a problem with their built in OS.

But the most dastardly thing I've seen yet is trying to force a budget TV buyer to pay a monthly fee to use the USB port to watch movies on a flash drive. I made my uncle a copy of Picard Seasons 1 - 3 and couldn't even use it on one of these new cheap 32" TVs. That's just diabolical.
 
I typically buy Vizio. Never had a problem with their built in OS.

But the most dastardly thing I've seen yet is trying to force a budget TV buyer to pay a monthly fee to use the USB port to watch movies on a flash drive. I made my uncle a copy of Picard Seasons 1 - 3 and couldn't even use it on one of these new cheap 32" TVs. That's just diabolical.
What brand of TV is that?!?! Never heard of that practice... wonder if there's a way to "bypass" that...
 
This is more Roku's fault than TCL.

I know for a fact after you buy a purely TCL TV you almost never get more than 1 fw update. Most people eventually use an Apple TV to provide the smarts as you TCL will never get updates (which is probably a good thing when using Android)
 
Back