you cannot buy it in Europe for the MSRP $450 but for $600 so yes its non-existent as you wrote it
it was the same with Ryzen 3000 and 4000 series
its biased towards the AMD piece obviously
because if AMD is slower than intel its JUST few percent but when AMD was 5% quicker with ryzen 3000 series it was hail the AMD king all over the place.
and despite the fact that the AMD is slower in majority of games you tested you wrote:
[HEADING=1]The Best Gaming CPU?[/HEADING]
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is without question one of the top gaming CPUs
but dont worry we are used to it already, you always find a way how to praise AMD because if it is not directly more performance you start to dig in the value and if there is no value you look at power consumption
For example, the 5600X is just 9% slower than the Ryzen 7 3700X and 10% slower than the
Core i7-10700K, that's a phenomenal result given it packs 25% fewer cores.
Looking at Cinebench R20 as a rough guide, we see that the 5600X's multi-core performance is just 9% lower than that of the 3700X and 10% lower than the 10700K, and that's not a big difference.
In our opinion, the key issue for Intel is AMD's aggressive pricing. Although the Ryzen 5 3600 should be the slightly more expensive CPU at ~$200, for the past
few weeks it's been selling for just $175 (
or even less, as of writing).
When it comes to gaming performance the Core i5 processor is roughly on par with the 3600, while for productivity tasks AMD's offering is often up to 10% faster while consuming a similar level of power.
So are you trying to find out really what is the Best Gaming CPU?