Scientists at Microsoft, IBM, and others are turning to AI to discover the next generation of battery tech

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,913   +58
Staff
Looking ahead: Recent advancements in scientific discovery methodologies are using AI and emerging quantum technologies to compress decades of materials research into months or weeks. While these technologies are still evolving, their early successes in battery development suggest a future where sustainable, high-performance energy storage could become more accessible and environmentally responsible.

Artificial intelligence and advanced computing are helping scientists quickly identify and develop new battery materials, reducing reliance on lithium and other scarce resources. In a collaboration between Microsoft and the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), researchers have identified a promising new solid-state electrolyte, NaxLi3−xYCl6, which could reduce lithium use by approximately 70 percent, marking a significant step toward more sustainable and efficient batteries.

The process began with Microsoft deploying its AI-powered Azure Quantum Elements platform to sift through an immense dataset of 32 million inorganic compounds. The AI model, known as M3GNet, accelerates molecular dynamics simulations, evaluating properties such as atomic diffusivity, a factor critical to electrolyte performance. Through successive screening stages, the initial list was narrowed to approximately 500,000 stable candidates, and then further reduced to 18 promising materials within 80 hours – a task that would typically require years of traditional experimentation and computation.

PNNL researchers then synthesized the top candidate material, incorporating both sodium and lithium ions in its crystalline structure. This hybrid ionic approach was previously considered unlikely due to the differences in ionic sizes and similar charges, but testing revealed a synergistic effect, where sodium and lithium ions facilitate each other's movement through the electrolyte channels.

The new solid-state electrolyte demonstrated viable ionic conductivity across a range of temperatures, supporting its potential use in safer, high-density solid-state batteries. Solid-state batteries use a solid material instead of a flammable liquid, making them safer and capable of storing more energy than regular lithium-ion batteries.

Beyond this specific discovery, the broader push to leverage AI in battery research reflects a shifting paradigm. Researchers like Dibakar Datta at the New Jersey Institute of Technology have applied machine learning frameworks such as crystal diffusion variational autoencoders and large language models to explore multivalent batteries, which use ions like magnesium and calcium that are capable of carrying multiple charges. These larger ions present design challenges, as they may disrupt existing battery materials, but AI enables rapid screening of suitable porous structures to accommodate them.

At IBM Research, AI models trained on billions of molecules play a crucial role in identifying and optimizing complex electrolyte formulations. Using foundation models and deep search algorithms, IBM's team expedites the discovery of battery-safe chemicals with enhanced ionic conductivity and stability.

Additionally, IBM employs digital twins that simulate degradation over thousands of charge cycles. These models allow researchers to predict long-term performance in a fraction of the time laboratory tests require. IBM's collaborative projects include work with electric vehicle manufacturers to design next-generation high-voltage electrolytes following these AI-driven methods.

Looking forward, both Microsoft and IBM are exploring the role of quantum computing in battery materials research. Quantum computers have the potential to simulate atomic and molecular interactions at levels of detail that are unattainable by classical systems, enabling more precise modeling of complex solid-state materials and innovative chemistries, such as lithium-sulfur or sodium-ion batteries. This could accelerate discovery further and improve design optimization for battery longevity and energy density.

Permalink to story:

 
Absolutely wonderful use of AI to discover technology that will never see the light of day. But it will definitely add to the weekly miracle battery articles we see here on Techspot.

As has been noted MANY times: it takes well over a decade to get a technology to market, and that's assuming it gets funded by some entity. And if that technology needs to be integrated into another product (like batteries) that time span could easily double. Actual products ALWAYS lag behind the underlying tech by decades.

The one exception is when a government gets directly involved and basically forces adoption through ungodly amounts of funding. Digital computers are a prime example of this; went from a lab at MIT to a deliverable product in "just" five years or so.

What will probably happen is China will eventually adopt the best-performing battery tech, and everyone will coalesce around that.
 
The one exception is when a government gets directly involved and basically forces adoption through ungodly amounts of funding. Digital computers are a prime example of this; went from a lab at MIT to a deliverable product in "just" five years or so.
IMO, given the current political climate, in the US anyway, that is highly unlikely to happen unless some brain cells are offered for transplant.
What will probably happen is China will eventually adopt the best-performing battery tech, and everyone will coalesce around that.
IMO, its more likely that China will put some bucks behind something like this as they are still moving forward, and ahead of the US, in green technology.
 
This is the kind of story that quietly signals a turning point — AI isn’t just summarizing papers or writing code anymore, it’s actively doing science. Compressing years of trial-and-error into a week could change how every lab operates.
 
This is the kind of story that quietly signals a turning point — AI isn’t just summarizing papers or writing code anymore, it’s actively doing science. Compressing years of trial-and-error into a week could change how every lab operates.
Now they'll just have to spend years double checking all the AI's work and finding all the hallucinations instead. #progress
 
The one exception is when a government gets directly involved and basically forces adoption through ungodly amounts of funding. Digital computers are a prime example of this; went from a lab at MIT to a deliverable product in "just" five years or so.

Helping to fund the first TOTALLY digital computer as a war time project during WWII is like saying we wouldn't have jet airplanes if it wasn't for the government. While it may have shortened development time, the concept that without government funding it would have taken in excess of 10 years is ludicrous. If the governments of the world were responsible for all scientific advancement, we probably wouldn't have half of it because most government projects wind up over budget and under perform. Even a blind squirrel will find a nut once in a while.

Russia is hardly a tech leader with the governmnent running everything, and our private coporations either gave away or had their tech stolen by China.
 
I don't know what inputs the AI is being fed, but it needs to account for farts humans produce, 'cos some can double a car mileage.
 
Helping to fund the first TOTALLY digital computer as a war time project during WWII is like saying we wouldn't have jet airplanes if it wasn't for the government. While it may have shortened development time, the concept that without government funding it would have taken in excess of 10 years is ludicrous. If the governments of the world were responsible for all scientific advancement, we probably wouldn't have half of it because most government projects wind up over budget and under perform. Even a blind squirrel will find a nut once in a while.
Universities are government funded R&D labs, when you really think about it. Private industry is good at turning an invention into a *product* or adapting something that exists to take a new form, but historically piss-poor when it comes to developing something technologically new.
Russia is hardly a tech leader with the governmnent running everything, and our private coporations either gave away or had their tech stolen by China.
Russia spends a tiny fraction of what the US does in R&D, and focuses only on filling immediate short-term needs (and even then fails due to either politics or lack of funding). Nevermind it's a closed system, meaning it closes itself off to new ideas and technologies, which *always* leads to stagnation.

China as of the 70s did the exact opposite.
 
Universities are government funded R&D labs, when you really think about it. Private industry is good at turning an invention into a *product* or adapting something that exists to take a new form, but historically piss-poor when it comes to developing something technologically new.

Russia spends a tiny fraction of what the US does in R&D, and focuses only on filling immediate short-term needs (and even then fails due to either politics or lack of funding). Nevermind it's a closed system, meaning it closes itself off to new ideas and technologies, which *always* leads to stagnation.

China as of the 70s did the exact opposite.

Ah, so the universities and government built the vacuum tubes said computer was made of? Laser, transistor, the light bulb, the telephone, the IC were all built by inventors at private firm. The auto and airplane were invented by private industry, so was the assembly line. While the government did fund some projects, far more was done at Bell Labs in it's day then the government.

HA, you mean to say that since the 70's their theft and confication of IP has multiplied. The very first microwave that sold for under $100 was a such a blatant copy of a Panasonc built in China by Panasonic, it had the identical internal stamping including the ones that Panasonic never used. If something become a hot seller, China will have a knock off ready to undercut it. China didn't invent pharmaceuticals, but they sure cornered the market quick enough. I could go on, but China commoditized things, not invented them,
 
Eventually, one of these discoveries will come to market and the world will be forever changed.
 
Yeah the next gen of battery tech is called solid-state and will be on the roads next year but BYD already has much getter version ready to go in 2027: 932 miles, 400Wh/kg, 12 minutes full charge.

So are we talking the next next gen for say 2050's, at which point Nuclear fusion will only another 20 years away.
 
Back