Tech layoffs are piling up: 80,000 jobs cut in early 2026, and AI is getting the blame

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,010   +58
Staff
Bottom line: The first quarter of 2026 has already delivered one of the most turbulent job cycles the global tech industry has faced in recent years. Nearly 80,000 people have been laid off worldwide between January and April, with more than three-quarters of those cuts occurring in the United States. What stands out is that almost half of them – about 37,600 positions – are tied to automation and artificial intelligence, according to reports.

But industry experts say it may be too early to conclude that modern AI systems are directly responsible for most of these job losses. Cognizant Chief AI Officer Babak Hodjat told Nikkei Asia that companies often cite artificial intelligence as a convenient explanation during restructuring.

"I don't know if they are directly related to actual productivity gains," Hodjat said. "Sometimes, you know, AI becomes the scapegoat from a financial perspective, like when a company hired too many, or they want to resize, and it gets blamed on AI."

Hodjat added that the real wave of AI-related labor shifts may still be ahead. "It will take another six months to a year before companies start seeing real productivity gains from AI," he said, noting that the transition "will be painful for all of us as we're going through it, and simply because it's a transition."

In the meantime, layoffs continue across major players. Oracle has reportedly cut more than 10,000 jobs, with the savings redirected toward data center investments and AI infrastructure.

Other executives have also warned of broader structural change ahead. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and Ford CEO Jim Farley have both predicted that AI could eliminate as many as half of all entry-level white-collar jobs in the United States.

A Stanford study has already found that entry-level coding and customer service positions are being affected, while an MIT simulation estimated that automation could replace 11.7% of the US workforce – equivalent to roughly $1.2 trillion in salaries.

Amid these projections, some executives are urging caution in blaming AI outright. "I don't know what the exact percentage is, but there's some AI washing where people are blaming AI for layoffs that they would otherwise do, and then there's some real displacement by AI of different kinds of jobs," said OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, speaking at the India AI Impact Summit.

Some firms are already showing a different outcome. IBM, for example, has tripled entry-level hiring this year, saying that while AI may perform much of the routine work, human oversight remains essential. The company's position aligns with broader findings from European data, showing that businesses investing heavily in AI often expand their workforce rather than shrink it.

Cognizant – whose operations rely heavily on people – has also taken a measured approach. The company has established AI labs in San Francisco and Bengaluru to develop custom AI tools tailored to client needs. But Hodjat said Cognizant does not plan to cut staff. Instead, he said, employees will be trained to work alongside AI systems, and the firm even expects to hire more junior workers. He said many new graduates will struggle to find work because they lack practical, domain-specific skills, so companies will need to hire them anyway and train them on the job to use AI effectively in different fields.

For now, the tech industry sits in a state of transition – one where the impact of AI on employment is real but not yet fully settled. Whether it results in a long-term contraction or a redefinition of work may depend less on automation itself and more on how companies choose to adapt.

Permalink to story:

 
I'm sure the AI apologists will say this is a good thing, and that unemployment numbers are still low so there's nothing to worry about.
And the other concern is, companies will probably realize they simply can't replace real people with AI and still accomplish anything. As mentioned, companies will just look to hire back people with H1B visas so they can pay a fraction of the average wage, while everyone else will get denied for having "too much experience" or something like that.
 
GREED and nothing more, these CEO's will sacrifice their 1st born if it mean they can add a few more millions to their bank account.
 
What we really need are some better professional networking sites.

Have you browsed linkedin lately? It's 30% fake content, 30% AI is the devil, 30% AI is our savior, 9.9999% promotional spam, and 0.0001% genuine corporate networking.

Thankfully I am in stable employment and don't need to look for work anytime soon, but I feel really bad for people who are trying to use linkedin to get their next job. My advice: Linkedin is trash. Network somewhere else.
 
GREED and nothing more, these CEO's will sacrifice their 1st born if it mean they can add a few more millions to their bank account.
Do you employ a typist, proofreader, and professional editor to check your Internet posts ... or do you greedily use a software program to do it for you, thereby denying at least three people employment?

In my college days, there were several hundred professional typists employed pretty much full time, typing papers and other assignments for students. By the mid-80s, they had all been replaced by word processors. So sad, eh?
 
>>> Nearly 80,000 people have been laid off worldwide

Oh.
Why the AI hysteria fueling title omits 'worldwide' ???
How many were hired worldwide during the same period?

The negative effect of AI on the job market is negligible to non-existent. The positive effect, on the other hand, is colossal.
 
Turns out those empty offices were never really about realized real estate usage, were they? That was just a lame excuse those in power used to get you back in the office. They literally don't care when they get their AI savings by replacing a human. That office is still empty though.
 
Turns out those empty offices were never really about realized real estate usage, were they? That was just a lame excuse those in power used to get you back in the office. They literally don't care when they get their AI savings by replacing a human. That office is still empty though.
The facts here have eluded you. No major company rolled back remote work policies by claiming "we're paying for offices that we absolutely must fill." The concerns were over productivity and the added complexity of managing a remote workforce.
 
Last edited:
LOL, I'll give you half-credit. The Fortune article actually was based on a survey from Resume.org. I'll quote from it:

"...The primary drivers for requiring employees to return to the office include fostering collaboration and teamwork (69%), improving communication (58%), strengthening company culture (51%), boosting productivity (47%), and simplifying employee management (41%). Additionally, 40% of companies cited a desire to make better use of the office space they pay for as a reason behind their RTO policies...."


The only CEO actually cited was Ali Zane:

"...“Trust is the cornerstone of our business as a credit repair firm dealing with sensitive financial situations,” explains Ali Zane, CEO of Imax Credit Repair. “While remote work proved functional, face-to-face interactions reassured clients during high-stakes consultations. Additionally, our team thrives on in-person brainstorming sessions where complex strategies are developed collaboratively. The energy of a room often inspires solutions that don’t materialize over video call.”
 
Scum like Jensen Huang will be popping champagne bottles with glee no doubt, despite denying this would ever happen at first, then saying too bad so sad.
 
We all knew it will happen and this is literally nothing. Drop in the bucket. How many people are on this planet? This is not even alot for a small tiny country. Just wait 5-10 more years. You will start seeing even bigger numbers.. from so many different jobs, not just tech related. I can't wait, cus it will be a fun future.

We all knew it will come, then it will be here and then what? Im curious what's after that. If a ton of people are starving, what happens? Crime? Revolution? War? Someone gotta make a movie about this, might wake up people. Probably not, people dont care it seems. Alot of bla bla bla and nothing being done.
Guess time to go back to farming LOL! AI can't take my tomatoes out of my soil. My food skynet, mine!
 
If you ask me, the real reason for the layoffs is not because AI is great and replacing jobs, but because of the below. It is quite obvious when you are spending significantly more than you are earning, and lending either is drying up or getting too expensive, the next thing to do is to cut cost. And this is same problem/ trend across all the big AI companies.

"Oracle has reportedly cut more than 10,000 jobs, with the savings redirected toward data center investments and AI infrastructure."
 
Do you employ a typist, proofreader, and professional editor to check your Internet posts ... or do you greedily use a software program to do it for you, thereby denying at least three people employment?

In my college days, there were several hundred professional typists employed pretty much full time, typing papers and other assignments for students. By the mid-80s, they had all been replaced by word processors. So sad, eh?

No trill, its much simpler than that !!!

People don't want the koolaid anymore, so they need to get rid of the employees...

Your head is next,,, but keep it koolaid going... We need some dumb employees taking over some robots jobs.
 
Back