SoftBank boss says the AI revolution will cost $5 trillion a year, also, there's no bubble

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,593   +975
Staff
Sarah Connor warned us: Multiple reports are routinely confirming that the alleged "AI revolution" is not going the way Big Tech and VC investors would like it to. SoftBank's founder and largest shareholder, however, still believes the revolution will come to pass. AI skeptics, in his view, are simply on the wrong side of history. Or are they?

Masayoshi Son is hell-bent on bringing AI to the masses, and he's ready to spend the enormous sums required to reach this historic goal. Speaking at SoftBank's annual corporate conference in Tokyo, the outspoken founder shared a few numbers about that spending, though he chose not to elaborate on exactly where the money would come from.

Son believes developing and deploying AI for the wider society will cost $5 trillion a year through 2040. He said he's "confident" that figure reflects the true cost of the AI revolution. His reasoning: if AI-related revenue eventually accounts for 20% of global GDP by 2040, spending $5 trillion, or roughly 800 trillion yen, a year to get there will ultimately amount to a rounding error.

In recent years, Son has emerged as one of the most enthusiastic proponents of generative AI, chatbots, and other LLM-related technologies. SoftBank has invested heavily in OpenAI and several other AI-related unicorns, and Son has previously predicted that the first true artificial general intelligence (AGI) will arrive by 2030.

Given all that, Son doesn't want to hear anything about an AI bubble. Asking about one, he says, is an absurd proposition, and people who raise the question, in his words, simply don't understand what AI is about. SoftBank has made a few prescient bets on tech unicorns in the past, providing early investment to Chinese giant Alibaba and bringing the iPhone to the Japanese market.

However, the conglomerate has also made some costly mistakes. WeWork, the office sharing company SoftBank valued at $47 billion in 2019, ultimately filed for bankruptcy a few years later.

The AI revolution could hand the Japanese conglomerate and its "boss" another massive stream of profits, a second Alibaba, but with exponentially bigger margins. Or it could turn into an exponentially larger dot-com bubble, one that burns large parts of the financial world, Wall Street included.

According to Deutsche Bank analysts, the AI boom may currently be the only thing keeping the US economy out of a recession. Separately, several surveys suggest many CEOs privately believe an AI bubble does exist, yet remain in full FOMO mode, planning to keep investing regardless. Meanwhile, nearly half of the data center projects planned for 2026 in the US aren't likely to come online on schedule, and rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East add another layer of uncertainty.

And yet, Son appears unfazed. SoftBank's CEO predicts AI data centers will need 3 terawatts of power generation by 2040, nearly double the total power consumed worldwide today.

To meet that demand, Son said gas will serve as the primary power source in the near term, with nuclear fusion, not traditional nuclear plants, eventually taking over as the cheaper, cleaner alternative. Asked whether space based solar power, as championed by Elon Musk, could be the answer instead, Son said both could play a role, but that fusion on Earth would ultimately be the more practical option.

Within the next decade and a half, Son believes, AI agents will be the ones calling the shots, as many as 100 trillion of them by 2040. "We will go from a human-centric world to an agent-centric world. The age when humans are the highest life form on Earth will end. For better or for worse, it will happen, and it can't be stopped," Son said.

Permalink to story:

 
Either AI does work the way it's being sold to us as and it crashes the economy because noone has a job or it doesn't work and it crashes the economy because the businesses can't pay back investors creating something similar to the subprime loan crisis.

Investors and shareholders loge AI because it sounds like an infinite money glitch. The problem with having infinite money is that it becomes worthless and it's no different from having zero money
 
IF it hits that revenue, sure, but HOW will you hit that revenue? If AI claims of replacing huge chunks of the workforce come to pass, who is going to be paying for it?

If AI is going to constitute 23.4 trillion in income, is it coming from normal people? If evenly spread among all 8 billion people on Earth, that is close to $3k per year per person. Even AI enthusiasts are not paying that kind of price to rent tokens with a chatbot. Is it corporations paying that to free themselves form the burden of labor? Then who will be buyign the products of those corporations? The AI chatbots?

Masayoshi is vastly overestimating this market. Just like he did with WeWork. Seemingly there was no limit to how far WeWork could spread too, it was gonna take over the industry and render all former concepts of office work obsolete....until it didnt. Because there were only so many people who wanted shared coworking spaces to rent. Or like the dot com boom, sure there was a market for the internet, but the infrastructure grew far too fast and most of those early companies were bankrupt long before the internet started paying off, and even with the profits today, there isnt enough to sustain the insane dreams of 1999.
 
5 trillion a year and it comes all from Softbank? After all, that's what he thinks. I wonder where does all that money come from and if there's any possibility of making money at all. We are like 4 to 5 years into this craze and the narrative has always been it will make money someday. But looking at the business model and the cost to keep this going, it is not sustainable at all.
 
I believe we are watching the electrical digital infrastructure being reborn. This isn't about AI. This is about energy, surviellance and logistics. Invest what you can in the big tech companies, energy companies, banks and oil/ gas companies. My portfolio is green because it's all dividend paying stocks. This is your chance to build wealth in the market.
 
Meanwhile IBM stock lost 25% over night.
Yes, because no one wants to buy an IBM mainframe to do transaction processing any longer; it was their well-below-target sales of their Z mainframe line that drug down their figures.

Either AI does work the way it's being sold to us as and it crashes the economy because noone has a job...
Not once in history has increased productivity cost long-run jobs. People once claimed electric machines would eliminate most jobs, yet 95% of the professions today weren't even in existence then. The same will be true for the AI-driven world of tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
Back