SpaceX will build a $100 billion Starbase in Louisiana, a 195-square-mile spaceport designed for thousands of annual launches

midian182

Posts: 12,017   +183
Staff member
What we know so far: SpaceX has announced that it plans to build a new $100 billion spaceport on the Louisiana Gulf Coast, and to say it will be massive is an understatement. The company plans to construct the facility across 125,000 acres, or 195 square miles, in an area known as Pecan Island.

SpaceX president and chief operating officer Gwynne Shotwell said the facility, aptly named Starbase Louisiana, will be a self-sustaining spaceport with propellant production, power generation, deep-water shipping capabilities, vehicle-processing facilities, and even an airport.

The site is expected to house five launch complexes with two pads and a propellant farm apiece. That would make it SpaceX's fourth and largest launch site, with the capacity to support thousands of missions per year. Construction is due to begin in 2027, and the first launch is targeted for 2029, according to Louisiana Economic Development.

SpaceX likely chose the location for several reasons: its vast footprint provides room for expansion, the Gulf offers access to a wide range of launch trajectories, and Louisiana's abundant natural gas can supply both power and the methane used by Starship's Raptor engines. Deep-water access would also allow SpaceX to move the enormous vehicles and other hardware by ship.

That ambitious launch rate depends on SpaceX making Starship rapidly and fully reusable. It was recently reported that the redesigned Starship V3 completed its first full test flight, while a 2024 milestone saw the company catch a returning Super Heavy booster using the launch tower's giant mechanical arms.

Starbase Louisiana would help launch Starlink satellites, missions to the Moon and Mars, and SpaceX's proposed orbital data centers – a plan that may involve up to one million satellites.

State officials expect the project to create 3,000 direct jobs over a decade with an average salary of $92,600, plus more than 8,100 indirect positions.

Louisiana has offered tax rebates and recruitment assistance, while SpaceX has agreed to make more than $820 million in local payments over 25 years and donate $25 million to a regional community foundation.

Unsurprisingly, the enormous scale of the development has raised plenty of concerns, especially when it comes to environmental implications.

The site occupies fragile coastal marshland close to protected wildlife areas, and residents and conservation groups fear the noise, light, traffic, and construction could harm fisheries, migratory birds, and wetlands that serve as a natural hurricane buffer. Many locals also say they were kept in the dark while officials negotiated the deal.

SpaceX's history suggests that people's concerns could be warranted. The company underestimated the blast effects of Starship's first integrated launch in Texas, which made a crater and scattered debris across the surrounding area. However, the Louisiana project will still face federal licensing and environmental reviews before rockets can fly.

SpaceX says it will develop only a small part of the property, leave large areas untouched, and work with state agencies to restore eroding marshland. It also plans to hold public town halls in the coming months.

Permalink to story:

 
The site occupies fragile coastal marshland close to protected wildlife areas, and residents and conservation groups fear the noise, light, traffic, and construction could harm fisheries, migratory birds,
That's the pinnacle of absurdity.
Whatever you try to build, it will affect some slug or cockroach. Should we really sacrifice space exploration to preserve cockroaches?

I would like to know who's financing those "conservation groups". Getting bribes from our enemies should be considered treason.
 
Not mentioned by the article is that 3000 local jobs is the lower limit and SpaceX expects to employ 10,000 jobs instead. Furthermore, it’s committed to hiring locals first. Since this is infrastructure, SpaceX said they don’t really need rocket scientists nearly as much as they need technicians and engineers.

In addition, a second more successful Starship V3 rocket test has since been completed. It performed a true water landing. The rocket splashed down (no explosion) and was left floating. It was subsequently towed to Christmas Island and SpaceX plans to return it to America for further analysis and historical purposes. That said, the booster (first stage rocket) did not land. SpaceX plans to launch another Starship V3 for testing purposes in the next few weeks.

While you can’t call this a true landing because it was left in the water and cannot be reused, it is the first recovery of a second stage rocket of all time.
Why wouldn’t you build a spaceport inside a nature preserve that was created as a distance buffer for structures from hurricanes?

I can’t think of a single reason.
It is not a nature preserve. SpaceX bought half the land directly south of Pecan Island between 2 refuges (meant for research and public use). Those separate refuges are simply state owned, meant for their own purposes by humans and to protect animals. And people live in Pecan Island lol: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecan_Island,_Louisiana


It makes even more sense when SpaceX has committed to spending $100M to restoring the marshland and retreating shorelines. This was also left out of the article for some reason: https://thecurrentla.com/2026/starbase-louisiana-governor-spacex-announce-worlds-largest-spaceport/
The Current Lafayette said:
[The Governor] Landry said the state secured $100 million for coastal restoration as part of the deal, along with a $25 million pledge to the Community Foundation of Acadiana.

Separately, Vermilion Parish will receive an upfront payment of $20 million and roughly $25 million a year for 25 years under a PILOT agreement the parish’s Industrial Development Board approved Tuesday morning, LED Secretary Susan Bourgeois said — a figure she put at close to $800 million over the life-span of the deal.
 
Last edited:
Starship is not even a functional platform, just barely recovered an undamaged Starship. No missions beyond low orbit, not even close to a manned mission, jumping the Rail Gun aren't ya Mr. Musk? Get Starship functional and capable of manned missions, complete numerous missions proving it's reliability and safety. Increasing launch cadence on existing infrastructure in place at the Cape and in Texas.

Surely you can beat NASA to the Moon given their STS platform of 1 launch per 2 -3 years cadence.
 
$100 Billion spaceport.

Just think about that number for a minute. It was not long ago that only the US government had that kind of money to build something at this scale. Now it is just another day of business for a tech company.
 
Whatever you try to build, it will affect some slug or cockroach. Should we really sacrifice space exploration to preserve cockroaches?
:rolleyes: 🤣Its long been theorized by Science, no less, that cockroaches would outlive humanity even if some dolt were to start a nuclear holocaust.You cannot eliminate cockroaches. IMO, The better question to ask is what benefits do cockroaches provide? https://blog.entomologist.net/what-benefits-do-cockroaches-provide.html
Its a typical argument given by those who piss and moan about "your favorite pest to ignorantly hate here", however, when cockroaches, or some other beneficial pest are gone, most everyone will be saying, "Gee, we never should have eliminated cockroaches."
I would like to know who's financing those "conservation groups". Getting bribes from our enemies should be considered treason.
Great bogeyman conspiracy theory. Do you check for cockroaches under your bed every night before you go to sleep?
Not mentioned by the article is that 3000 local jobs is the lower limit and SpaceX expects to employ 10,000 jobs instead. Furthermore, it’s committed to hiring locals first. Since this is infrastructure, SpaceX said they don’t really need rocket scientists nearly as much as they need technicians and engineers.

In addition, a second more successful Starship V3 rocket test has since been completed. It performed a true water landing. The rocket splashed down (no explosion) and was left floating. It was subsequently towed to Christmas Island and SpaceX plans to return it to America for further analysis and historical purposes. That said, the booster (first stage rocket) did not land. SpaceX plans to launch another Starship V3 for testing purposes in the next few weeks.

While you can’t call this a true landing because it was left in the water and cannot be reused, it is the first recovery of a second stage rocket of all time.

It is not a nature preserve. SpaceX bought half the land directly south of Pecan Island between 2 refuges (meant for research and public use). Those separate refuges are simply state owned, meant for their own purposes by humans and to protect animals. And people live in Pecan Island lol: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecan_Island,_Louisiana


It makes even more sense when SpaceX has committed to spending $100M to restoring the marshland and retreating shorelines. This was also left out of the article for some reason: https://thecurrentla.com/2026/starbase-louisiana-governor-spacex-announce-worlds-largest-spaceport/
I know you think fElon/SpaceX/Tesla can do no wrong, however, this is a big endeavor. IMO, perhaps a better question to ask is do SpaceX needs and expected income justify the cost (cost of all kinds even those that are not apparent) of this endeavor? Because if those aspects do not justify the needs for something like this, it will be doomed to failure even before it starts.

IMO, this is just another SpaceX bloviation much like fElon's bloviation of being on Mars by now.

And as far as environmental impacts, of which I am sure you could give a crap, the connections between these two preserves may be just as important as the preserves themselves. Not to mention what benefits, that are willfully ignored, do these preserves provide?

But people think fElon is a stable genius and we should all worship him when he comes along and, repeatedly, makes promises he cannot and will not keep.
 
Bow down, praise, and worship the Tech Bros; after all, they are Gods and can do no wrong!!!!!!!! We are all worms before them.
 
$100 Billion spaceport.

Just think about that number for a minute. It was not long ago that only the US government had that kind of money to build something at this scale. Now it is just another day of business for a tech company.
Fantastic, right?
This company launches to orbit many times more stuff than all the governments on earth combined. We are so lucky to have such companies, and a system that allows for human ingenuity to thrive.
 
It'll never get built.

Like so much of the fat MAGA Nazi's projects...but it keeps the morons happy who buy into his ponzi scheme level delusions.
I'm generally pretty skeptical of anything SpaceX or Musk announces. But out of all of their announcements over the past 15 years, this one is probably the most believable - aside from the sheer scale. And if they model it after the Cape, they might just end up turning that plot of land into what is effectively a wildlife refuge.

No chance they get to thousands of launches a year. Little chance they get to the full 10 pads. But I can see ~5 pads and a ~100 launches a year. Maybe. If things go extremely well for them.
 
This will never get build. It's just another Elon Musk fantasy project like flying to Mars and his stupid hyperloop. The only reason they announced this is because the SpaceX IPO didn't fly to the moon (yes, joke is on purpose) like they expected. SpaceX stock is struggling so they will be announcing all kinds of fantastical projects to try and boost it so Musk can once again claim to be the first trillionaire.
 
Starship is not even a functional platform, just barely recovered an undamaged Starship. No missions beyond low orbit, not even close to a manned mission, jumping the Rail Gun aren't ya Mr. Musk? Get Starship functional and capable of manned missions, complete numerous missions proving it's reliability and safety. Increasing launch cadence on existing infrastructure in place at the Cape and in Texas.

Surely you can beat NASA to the Moon given their STS platform of 1 launch per 2 -3 years cadence.
You do realize that companies can do more than one thing at a time? The engineers working on improving Starship are not the same people who would be designing and building this space port. And with a complex engineering project like spacecraft development you can only throw so much money at it before you run into bottlenecks that money can't work around (good old mythical man-month kicks in here, hiring twice as many engineers won't make a project take half the length), so its better use of money to run unrelated projects in parallel.
 
$100 Billion spaceport.

Just think about that number for a minute. It was not long ago that only the US government had that kind of money to build something at this scale. Now it is just another day of business for a tech company.

You think spaceX is paying for it? It’ll all be loans and government funding.

SpaceX is about 17bn in the hole over the last few years
 
I know you think fElon/SpaceX/Tesla can do no wrong, however, this is a big endeavor. IMO, perhaps a better question to ask is do SpaceX needs and expected income justify the cost (cost of all kinds even those that are not apparent) of this endeavor? Because if those aspects do not justify the needs for something like this, it will be doomed to failure even before it starts.

IMO, this is just another SpaceX bloviation much like fElon's bloviation of being on Mars by now.

And as far as environmental impacts, of which I am sure you could give a crap, the connections between these two preserves may be just as important as the preserves themselves. Not to mention what benefits, that are willfully ignored, do these preserves provide?

But people think fElon is a stable genius and we should all worship him when he comes along and, repeatedly, makes promises he cannot and will not keep.
Unlike you, I didn't give an opinion in my post so what you quoted isn't evidence that I think "fElon/SpaceX/Tesla can do no wrong" lmao. I simply included relevant information that does not exist here. The fact that you're getting upset over me adding information to the article brings up some serious concerns on your ability to discern reality.

Meanwhile, you are clearly expressing an opinion every time you post with "fElon" considering he has not been convicted of any felony. Meanwhile, just yesterday I showed where "Tesla can do wrong" lmao: https://www.techspot.com/community/...mplaints-and-price-hikes.298584/#post-2218371

You should take your trash talking to the mirror before you come to me with it.
 
You think spaceX is paying for it? It’ll all be loans and government funding.

SpaceX is about 17bn in the hole over the last few years
Here are two examples of $75B new revenue combined that comes directly from infrastructure spending you claim put SpaceX "in the hole":

These are not from loans nor government funding. The math works out to allow up to $58B of operating expenses to provide these services to break even. Considering the main cost driver of AI compute is new infrastructure (not using existing infrastructure), I think there is a good chance operating expenses to run those data centers will be lower than $58B and SpaceX will be able to fund much of its own spaceport.
 
Last edited:
A 195-square-mile facility with its own power generation, methane production, port, airport, and ten launch pads sounds less like infrastructure and more like SpaceX founding a small industrial nation.

Thousands of launches per year is the part that really puts the scale into perspective. They're not planning another launchpad, they're planning something closer to an airport for rockets. If they build it.
 
Here are two examples of $75B new revenue combined that comes directly from infrastructure spending you claim put SpaceX "in the hole":

These are not from loans nor government funding. The math works out to allow up to $58B of operating expenses to provide these services to break even. Considering the main cost driver of AI compute is new infrastructure (not using existing infrastructure), I think there is a good chance operating expenses to run those data centers will be lower than $58B and SpaceX will be able to fund much of its own spaceport.
These are pinky promises based on contracts that aren’t worth the paper they’re written on and capacity they don’t actually have. It also doesn’t mean it’s profitable because they energy required for the training and compute of AI is more than the cost they charge to access it.

And can you show me the cause in 2023 and 2024 please? Becaure the only year they’ve turned a profit is 2025.
 
All this hate against Musk...Bezos and others just cracks me up.
Are they the best people in the world? No, but every time someone goes against these people spending money to make money, especially for space exploration and what not just ticks me off.
America and a lot of the west just sits on their hands, doesn't innovate anything any more. Too busy doom scrolling on their phones. All the while, countries like CHINA are building and innovating things and will eventually control the world!
 
Speaking as a complete layman, I think SpaceX has done incredibly well with the re-use etc. of their Falcon 9 gear. But hell...........Starship is so ****ing BIG!! I don't foresee them having that monster as reusable gear for a LONG time yet. But you know, more power to their elbow. I get that some people detest Elon Musk, but shoot, do we really want the Chinese to be in a superior position when it come to colonizing the moon?
 
These are pinky promises based on contracts that aren’t worth the paper they’re written on and capacity they don’t actually have. It also doesn’t mean it’s profitable because they energy required for the training and compute of AI is more than the cost they charge to access it.

And can you show me the cause in 2023 and 2024 please? Becaure the only year they’ve turned a profit is 2025.
Negative operating expenses have been intentional. This is a result of high R&D (ie. Starship & AI development). R&D leads to future profitability. That’s inevitably what Starship will provide.

What I’m talking about is all new revenue. It’s also NEAR TERM, which is the opposite of a pinky promise lol. One deal I mentioned started recently, and another starts in Q4. The impact has already nearly doubled SpaceX’s revenue (90% increase) in its most recent quarter: https://www.reuters.com/business/me...esults-strong-growth-its-starlink-2026-08-04/

Your claim that Tesla’s operating expenses will grow as SpaceX sells compute is unsubstantiated. Pleass provide me a source for that. On the contrary, SpaceX’s most recent quarterly results shows an improving margin YoY.
 
Negative operating expenses have been intentional. This is a result of high R&D (ie. Starship & AI development). R&D leads to future profitability. That’s inevitably what Starship will provide.
It’s really not it’s called being unsustainable.
What I’m talking about is all new revenue. It’s also NEAR TERM, which is the opposite of a pinky promise lol. One deal I mentioned started recently, and another starts in Q4. The impact has already nearly doubled SpaceX’s revenue (90% increase) in its most recent quarter: https://www.reuters.com/business/me...esults-strong-growth-its-starlink-2026-08-04/
And it’s hyped up to be better than it is. It’s also still made a loss.
Your claim that Tesla’s operating expenses will grow as SpaceX sells compute is unsubstantiated. Pleass provide me a source for that. On the contrary, SpaceX’s most recent quarterly results shows an improving margin YoY.
When did I say Tesla?
 
Back