You forget my comment was a reply to your first post. Are you now disavowing your remarks?In my reply to your comment, I addressed free speech, not Musk specifically
Oops! None of those were "requests". They were government demands to comply with local law. As your article itself says:. At any rate, X seems to comply with many censorship requests (link elided)
"...Musk said: “The rules in India for what can appear on social media are quite strict, and we can’t go beyond the laws of a country,” and in doing so put his staff at risk, he added. “If we have a choice of either our people going to prison or us complying with the laws, we will comply with the laws.”....
I'll also note that no social media platform has fought such requests harder than Twitter, as they have legally battled the governments of Russia, Turkey, Brazil, Germany, and others. In the US, it was the release of the "Twitter files" that forced Facebook and other social media platforms to finally admit the extent to which they'd been pressured and extorted to silence true, but politically damaging content by Biden's FBI.
So why aren't you calling for bans on tobacco, sugary sweets, videogames, and binge shopping?Precedent doesn't make something right. If a consumer product is affecting people's lives negatively, limits are called for