Tesla driver charged with manslaughter after car in FSD mode crashes into Texas home

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,010   +58
Staff
In context: Federal safety officials are examining how Tesla's Full Self-Driving software was being used before a Model 3 slammed into a house outside Houston, killing a woman inside and leading to a manslaughter charge against the driver. The case is sharpening questions about how the software responds when drivers push it beyond its limits and what happens when those choices end in a fatal crash.

According to court records and an arrest affidavit, 44-year-old Michael David Butler was driving a 2025 Tesla Model 3 through a residential neighborhood in Katy, Texas, on June 19 when the car left the street and crashed into the home of 76-year-old Martha Avila.

She was taken to a nearby hospital and died there after the crash, the documents say. Butler is now in custody at the Harris County jail on a manslaughter charge. His attorney did not respond to a request for comment.

From the beginning, investigators have focused on how Butler was using Tesla's system. Butler told officials and paramedics that he was working as a DoorDash driver and that the car was in FSD mode before he "passed out" while changing music on the car's touchscreen, according to the affidavit. The affidavit said tests found no alcohol or drugs in his system.

Investigators turned to the car's data and cameras to check Butler's account. They seized the car's so-called "black box" and went through dash-camera footage and event data.

The affidavit says Butler manually pressed the accelerator pedal several times in the neighborhood where the crash occurred, "overriding the default FSD speed." At one point, the car reached 73 miles per hour on the residential street – more than twice the posted limit. The affidavit also notes there was no brake pedal input recorded in the final minute before the crash.

Tesla executives publicly disputed Butler's version of events. On social media, they said the driver pressed the accelerator pedal down and kept it pressed even after the crash. The company says FSD doesn't make its cars self-driving and that drivers still have to stay alert and be ready to step in.

Investigators also looked at Butler's phone. The affidavit says he ran several Google searches that indicated he was frustrated that FSD wasn't "aggressive" enough. That detail suggests a driver who wanted the software to push harder, even though it is designed to leave a safety margin and still depend on human oversight.

FSD is built to manage steering, acceleration, and braking while the driver oversees the system. It uses cameras and software to follow lanes, handle turns, and navigate through city streets, but it remains a driver-assistance feature.

Drivers are expected to stay alert and take over when the system makes a mistake or runs into something it can't handle. In this crash, investigators say Butler's manual use of the accelerator effectively overrode the automated side of the system.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened an investigation into the Katy crash. The agency has launched dozens of probes into incidents tied to Tesla's driver-assistance features over the years and requires automakers to report all fatal crashes involving systems like Full Self-Driving.

Permalink to story:

 
Seems like it would be an extremely simple and popular decision for Tesla to impose hard speed limits inside of residential areas.
 
He is in a big trouble. Many people who go over 60 on freeway.
But driving 70 on a 35mph road is just reckless.
He left himself very few chances to escape
a serious punishment. If that was his way
to pay bills, he is in even bigger trouble.
His life might be ruined regardless
of the sentence.
 
"The company says FSD doesn't make its cars self-driving and that drivers still have to stay alert and be ready to step in."

Then WHY IS IT CALLED FULL SELF DRIVING?!?

Also why would a self driving system allow the driver to exceed the speed limit like this? Shouldn't it refuse to accelerate or require the driver to disable it before speeding?
 
How many times are you going to recycle this for propaganda purposes?

This case has nothing to do with Tesla or FSD.
The driver was pressing the accelerator pedal, which overrides most of the functions. Exactly the same would have happened with every other car.
 
Why would a self driving system allow the driver to exceed the speed limit like this? Shouldn't it refuse to accelerate or require the driver to disable it before speeding?
the system legally is not allowed to override driver commands and that includes accelerating
 
[/QUOTE]
Seems like it would be an extremely simple and popular decision for Tesla to impose hard speed limits inside of residential areas.

They already have limits based on an amount over the speed limit for assisted modes. This guys pushed the accelerator. The car will not do 38 mph over the limit on it’s own.
 


They already have limits based on an amount over the speed limit for assisted modes. This guys pushed the accelerator. The car will not do 38 mph over the limit on it’s own.
[/QUOTE]
Until it glitches like the hundreds or crashes it gets into
 
My brother in law just got the Tesla Y. He said the only version that doesn't go above the speed limit is the sloth mode. Which is the slowest level out of 5.😱
 
Seems like it would be an extremely simple and popular decision for Tesla to impose hard speed limits inside of residential areas.
Even if they did, the minute a human takes over that overrides the cars system. No different than in a regular car. Cant keep trying to blame a system when the driver is simply at fault. I dont think there will ever be a perfect driving system or that there won't ever be no accidents.
 
But the entire thing was the system was still active
But once a human takes over like pressing the pedal, the system thinks you took over. Its no longer engaged, the person has the wheel. Whatever the person was doing, they were pressing the pedal which overrode the default speed.
 
Back