captaincranky
Posts: 19,690 +8,831
Well no. You have to incorporate operating expenses into the equation. Like the heat, the lights, the tent, and whatnot. You could get double the (alleged), cost of building the car back, it you do enough fancy accounting, and still not be in the black, if, gross expenses exceed net income.You aren't understanding what is being said.
Example
Cost to build single car $20K
Selling price of car $25K
Cost to build factory for upcoming model $100K
Build/sell zero cars, and you are $100K in debt
Build/sell 15 cars, and you are $25K in debt
Your previous statement implied that every car built put Tesla further in debt, when in fact, the opposite is true.
Saying a car is sold at a loss is far different from saying a company is operating with a loss.
Musk is good at creating diversions. One quarter, when Tesla was about to show a quarter billion dollar loss, he was off showing "drawings", for his supposed "spacesuit", for his supposed, "mars colony".
It's like a magic show. everybody is too busy marveling at her legs in black fishnets, they don't bother to try and figure out how the magician got the rabbit into the hat.
Really? If history tells us anything, it tells us the no empire can expand forever.Tesla could put on the brakes and choose to take profit for a few years... but in this industry, where there have been no successful newcomers for decades, that approach would ensure their demise....[ ]....
The government has a name for borrowing more money to pay back money you borrowed from a previous investor, while claiming it's profits. It's called , "a Ponzi scheme".
One thing I will give Musk credit for being able to do, is talk the wallet out of anyone's pocket, be it individual, corporation, or nation.
Last edited: