JamesSWD
Posts: 331 +184
Really? I guess you missed how the DNC plotted & rigged the primaries to hand the nomination to Hillary. Stop reading HuffPo.
Trump says "dishonest media" of Facebook, Google, and Twitter suppressed damaging Clinton news
- Thread starter midian182
- Start date
wiyosaya
Posts: 9,759 +9,644
Well I figure you are old enough to find them yourself. However, if you are afraid of the truth...
R
Raoul Duke
I'm not in the USA, but it's been pretty obvious to me that the media here is very, very anti-Trump.
Darth Shiv
Posts: 2,371 +886
And what exactly is that?
Darth Shiv
Posts: 2,371 +886
To be fair, Donald has been friendly firing constantly throughout his own campaign so anything the DNC did or has done is certainly far from the only reason Donald could/would/should lose the election.
Vote Carth Onasi 2016 - "I DONT want to TALK about it!"
(seriously though, everyone chill, election season is so much less frustrating when people use inside voices to argue, I wish people realized this)
(seriously though, everyone chill, election season is so much less frustrating when people use inside voices to argue, I wish people realized this)
drjekelmrhyde
Posts: 409 +156
If he took 5 minutes out of time to actually use them, he would no they aren't hiding anything. http://wtkr.com/2016/10/31/the-plag...medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark
wiyosaya
Posts: 9,759 +9,644
And if he actually paid attention, he would have known that the Senate Commerce Committee investigated Facebook and cleared them of any wrong doing.
The CEOs of both have openly stated their support for Hillary and expressed their disdain for Trump. Understandable when they farm out tech jobs that Americans could do, but won;t be hired by those CEOs and are messing their drawers if Trump gets elected and puts a stop to it. Hillary sure won't - she and Bill have been bought and paid for by big business many times over.
Apparently, you do not keep yourself well informed. The Clinton Foundation is being investigated for money laundering. The Wikileaks and other e-mail discoveries are pointing this out. Charity watch-dogs have also pointed out than less than 10-% of what the Clinton Foundation takes in actually goes to help out. The rest goes to the Clintons and their cronies and to support Hillary's campaign. If they were Republicans the mainstream media would have had them convicted many times over. Instead the media is another arm of the Democrat party. Woodward has already been taken to task after what he did to Nixon and has ignored with the Clintons. He has admitted on TV that he has no interest in what is going on with what the Clintons have done, including perjury because they are not Republicans.
Shows you what bad taste they have!
This election is important as it determines the direction of the country for the next 30 - 40 years. Most Europeans do not understand the system of government in the US (and, of course, the same can be said for those in the US who are totally ignorant of how most governments works in Europe. Who ever gets elected will try to appoint judges to the Supreme Court, which are lifetime positions. The left attempts to appoint judges that have no regard for the Constitution and even though, they supposed to judge cases presented to them as to whether or not they violate constitutional rights. The conservative judges adhere to the principals of the constitution as expressed in the written works of the "founding fathers" rather than contort it.
He is right whether or not you like him. The mainstream media has been an arm of the Democrat party for many years - longer than most people realize. Dishonest reporting and omissions of wrongdoing are practiced regularly by the media when it comes to politics and anything else that has political ramifications. As for actual elections, it has has already been reported of complaints at some early voting sites where the machines have "flipped the vote" to Clinton. Personally, I have seen "illegals" voting at elections. I have also seen them boarding buses to be taken to other polling sites to vote multiple times. Eight years ago, a Senate race had the outcome flipped when a ballot box mysteriously materialized with 500 votes, all for the "original losing" candidate to turn him into the winning candidate. Voter-ID laws have been struck down by left-wing state courts even though those same voters they claim do not have access to an ID need one to cash those welfare checks. Chicago is famous for the "graveyard vote" There have been precincts which have had more votes cast than registered voters. Plus too many ignorant people vote. They have no clue as to who is really running and where they really stand. Ask them basic Civics questions and they can't give an answer but can tell you the size of Kim Karshian's backside.
You need to stop watching MSNBC and Chris Matthews tingling leg.
Whether or not you agree with his firing of people, it is not the same as the DNC plotting to subvert Bernie like they did. Plus CNN recently fired Donna Brazile (another Clintonite who plotted against Bernie) for providing Hillary with the debate questions.
R
RustyTech
Thanks Rob Thubron for creating a political scene here.
Billy Vinson
Posts: 55 +31
Reading through the posts, comments... People are so brain dead - but not for long - people are waking up. All the Trump haters and TV-Heads can spout out is, "Conspiracy Theory!" That too, is regurgitating junk they assimilated from the Brainwashing machine (The TV). HAHAHA!!!! Fluoride works - makes you excellent, docile slaves. Why do you think HITLER and Stalin used it on their prisoners and guards.
GO TRUMP! Down with the corrupt establishment - FIRED!
GO TRUMP! Down with the corrupt establishment - FIRED!
Kibaruk
Posts: 3,836 +1,189
Lol that's a nice source that can definitely be taken super serious... it's just the suggested if you just go ahead and type hillary clinton health, you will read all those other super legit sources about her health issues, that's in no way being censored.
I do give you points on the video for the last "big brother watching" part of the video... lol.
And? How is that proof that they are "censoring" or suppressing or how you want to call it? If you search, you will find one way or the other. It's not like... it's not giving any hits back.
p51d007
Posts: 3,929 +3,876
I prepared myself for "president" Hillary Clinton, 6 months ago. As much as I can't stand her, I know I can survive 4 years of her. But, what a kick in the pants it would be to see Trump win. Like lemmings going over a cliff would be a lot of democrat/liberal/socialists. 
Billy Vinson
Posts: 55 +31
ONE OF MANY... But I doubt you will accept this, because the brain tends to reject new information that goes against its' belief system/s. http://www.infowars.com/top-psychologist-googles-algorithm-will-rig-the-election-for-hillary/
Last edited by a moderator:
Billy Vinson
Posts: 55 +31
Someone asked above about a source that proves Google is filtering, sensoring. I posted a link a couple of times, showing proof... TECHSPOT removed it.... Go to Infowars DOT com and the TOP story, right now is showing an item of proof... But, since TechSpot is biased... Here is a paragraph or two from the story:
Back in June it was revealed by SourceFed that Google was indeed manipulating its search results to bury unflattering stories about Hillary.
“For example, when typing “Hillary Clinton cri,” Google’s auto-complete function brings up as its top choice “Hillary Clinton crime reform,” even though competing search engines Bing and Yahoo show the most popular search topics are “Hillary Clinton criminal charges” and “Hillary Clinton crime,” reported the Washington Times.
In August last year, Politico reported on how “Google could rig the 2016 election” by altering its search algorithms.
Epstein also noted that Facebook has the power to shift up to 600,000 voters on election day by simply sending out targeted reminders to Hillary Clinton supporters telling them to vote, while not sending out the same reminder to Trump supporters.
According to Epstein, who is a Clinton supporter himself, “Hillary Clinton is guaranteed to win this election” by approximately 6.5 million votes because polls don’t take into account Google’s algorithm to control the behavior of up to 10 million voters.
Back in June it was revealed by SourceFed that Google was indeed manipulating its search results to bury unflattering stories about Hillary.
“For example, when typing “Hillary Clinton cri,” Google’s auto-complete function brings up as its top choice “Hillary Clinton crime reform,” even though competing search engines Bing and Yahoo show the most popular search topics are “Hillary Clinton criminal charges” and “Hillary Clinton crime,” reported the Washington Times.
In August last year, Politico reported on how “Google could rig the 2016 election” by altering its search algorithms.
Epstein also noted that Facebook has the power to shift up to 600,000 voters on election day by simply sending out targeted reminders to Hillary Clinton supporters telling them to vote, while not sending out the same reminder to Trump supporters.
According to Epstein, who is a Clinton supporter himself, “Hillary Clinton is guaranteed to win this election” by approximately 6.5 million votes because polls don’t take into account Google’s algorithm to control the behavior of up to 10 million voters.
Kibaruk
Posts: 3,836 +1,189
@Billy Vinson You do realize that those 600,000 voters a day are malecowfeces right? The popular election -once again- has no -as in zero- impact to who gets elected, so that is just part of the typical conspiracy theory malecowfeces. You should definitely get informed before vomiting all your "knowledge" to the internet.
Here, go read a bit.
Here, go read a bit.
IAMTHESTIG
Posts: 1,868 +901
Has anyone seen the "douche vs turd sandwich" South Park episodes? Hilarious... and pretty much on point. Both Trump and Hillary are TERRIBLE options. Unfortunately the large portion of the US population chose these two. I also wouldn't doubt for a second that there was also some manipulation during the primaries to push Bernie Sanders and Ted Cruz out of the race despite how good they were doing and how much better options they were. By manipulations that could mean anything. There has already been plenty of proof of small scale manipulations and as I'm sure many will remember it doesn't take much to sway a close race and make it seem believable. Believable doesn't mean real though, and plenty of folks have had enough of the political crap and just want it to end.
The theory is Trump is not a politician so he has the best chance of getting rid of it. I however believe he will become just as corrupt as the rest once he is in office, as it is almost unavoidable when exposed to so much. This is why we need to push the reset button and start over.
The theory is Trump is not a politician so he has the best chance of getting rid of it. I however believe he will become just as corrupt as the rest once he is in office, as it is almost unavoidable when exposed to so much. This is why we need to push the reset button and start over.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
These credit cards feature OLEDs that light up upon payment- techstrike replied
-
Fallout 4 mod downloads skyrocket following launch of TV series- Farkinell replied
