US government could take a stake in OpenAI as Trump explores AI equity plan

midian182

Posts: 11,755   +179
Staff member
A hot potato: The US government taking a stake in Intel last year was surprising enough, but Washington might not stop at chipmakers. Senior officials have reportedly discussed the idea of taking equity stakes in leading AI companies, including OpenAI, as the Trump administration looks for ways to ensure the public benefits from the artificial intelligence boom.

According to NOTUS, senior US officials have held preliminary discussions with major AI firms about the government receiving shares in their companies.

The details aren't set in stone, but the talks have reportedly centered on AI giants voluntarily handing over equity rather than the government simply buying stock on the open market. Returns from those stakes could then be used for public purposes, including a possible dividend for American households.

President Trump appeared to confirm that the idea is being considered while speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One. He said there are concepts under which "pieces" of AI companies could be given to the American public, creating what he described as a partnership between these firms and US citizens.

Trump also said his team would "look into" the proposal and suggested meetings with AI executives could take place soon.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has reportedly discussed the idea with government officials since Trump returned to office. NOTUS says Altman first raised the concept directly with the president in 2025 and has brought it up again with senior officials in recent weeks. Anthropic, however, is reportedly not involved in conversations about handing equity to the government.

In April, OpenAI published a report calling for a Public Wealth Fund that would give every citizen, including those without stock market investments, a stake in AI-driven economic growth. The fund could invest in AI companies and other businesses benefiting from the technology, allowing ordinary Americans to share in the upside – and perhaps, in an ironic twist, offer financial help if their jobs are automated by AI.

Also read: Anthropic is blacklisted by the Pentagon and being used by the NSA at the same time

"Create a Public Wealth Fund that provides every citizen – including those not invested in financial markets – with a stake in AI-driven economic growth," OpenAI's report states. "Policymakers and AI companies should work together to determine how to best seed the Fund, which could invest in diversified, long-term assets that capture growth in both AI companies and the broader set of firms adopting and deploying AI."

Last summer, the US government took a nearly 10% stake in Intel by converting $11.1 billion in CHIPS Act funding into equity. The passive ownership did not include board seats, but it marked a new direction in how Washington supports strategically important tech companies.

The government has since explored or announced similar equity-based support for rare earth and quantum computing firms, suggesting Intel was not a one-off.

Critics warn that the government could become both shareholder and regulator in these AI companies, creating obvious conflicts of interest. Others argue that if the firms really do become some of the most valuable businesses in history, taxpayers should get more than promises of future benefits.

Permalink to story:

 
Open AI has never made money. They're burning through investor dollars like mad. It appears Sam Altman was able to scam Trump with flattery and a dream of funding the US in the future. Instead, future losses could now be paid by the US, with no winning plan to monetize It's LLC, Altman found an ongoing source of funds. Very disappointing.
 
Nothing like TS deleted my whole comment for calling out the now ignored (and previously ignored) toxic political commenters, who are so quick to label things they don't like "fascist/nazi/authoritarian". Only in their echo chambers can their wild claims and "facts" make sense.

Is that still too spicy for TS? Or can I not defend myself because I called out someone of a particular political persuasion?
When that has happened to me it really just takes a minor rewording to get through.
One time I said, "you as****es" and it was pulled.
All I did was word it "the as****es" and it was not deleted.
I'm quite sure its the one on one personal zings that they don't want. Really, nobody does.
 
When that has happened to me it really just takes a minor rewording to get through.
One time I said, "you as****es" and it was pulled.
All I did was word it "the as****es" and it was not deleted.
I'm quite sure its the one on one personal zings that they don't want. Really, nobody does.
A year or few ago I remember I did exactly that; I re-commented minus what I thought was the spice, and I got banned by a trigger-happy mod for a day or more.

So, forgive me if I'm not going to take your word on that. With the other part being that my deleted comment wasn't even all that spicy to begin with.



I remember back in the day when a mod would just censor the "spicy" content they didn't like instead of nuking the rest of the comment...
 
This screams of exit plan knowing OpenAI is leaking money like a sieve and is not getting more users, especially paid ones, this is just pushing the eventual crash onto taxpayers
 
People complaining about "Trump" government taking over the AI...
Will they also complain in 2029 if a democrat becomes president?
Personally, I don't want government taking control of ANYTHING to do with AI.
 
Governments can't take stakes in commercial interests, it doesn't work. Do they then start making regulations that benefit their partly state-owned corporation at the expense of competitors? It's such an obviously massive conflict of interests. If it's a serious consideration its a very bad one, but more likely, given the current grifting criminals in charge in the US, it's just another filthy cash grab. Trump has been been snout-down feasting at every opportunity, this is just another instance of him using the office to make money.
 
Choo choo next stop state capitalism.

If we're doing it let's have the government buy meat processing companies and force them to buy pricey and sell cheap, buy power generation companies and force them to sell power cheap, and buy RE developers and have them build at cost.

If you can print the money, you can buy anything you want.
 
Governments can't take stakes in commercial interests, it doesn't work. Do they then start making regulations that benefit their partly state-owned corporation at the expense of competitors? It's such an obviously massive conflict of interests. If it's a serious consideration its a very bad one, but more likely, given the current grifting criminals in charge in the US, it's just another filthy cash grab. Trump has been been snout-down feasting at every opportunity, this is just another instance of him using the office to make money.

It is actually very common for governments to have controlling or at least significant interests in strategic companies. The likes of TSMC, Alibaba, Airbus, Saudi Aramco, Deutsche Telekom, China Mobile, DBS Bank, Air France-KLM, Etihad Airways, etc etc all have major government shareholdership. The list is really long.

I'm not saying that I think the same should apply to OpenAI (or even Intel), but the concept is not that outlandish.
 
Back