TSMC plans include at least four more 2nm fabs in $100 billion Arizona expansion

midian182

Posts: 11,742   +178
Staff member
Why it matters: TSMC has doubled down on its enormous US expansion plans, committing another $100 billion to its Arizona operations. The money is expected to fund at least four additional fabs producing chips at the 2nm node and below, along with advanced packaging facilities.

The announcement came as the Taiwanese giant posted another record quarterly profit and raised its 2026 capital expenditure forecast to as much as $64 billion.

CEO C.C. Wei announced the investment during TSMC's second-quarter earnings conference in Taipei. It adds to the $165 billion already pledged for Arizona, taking the chipmaker's total planned US spending to $265 billion.

TSMC has not provided a construction timeline, saying the pace will depend on market demand. Wei said four more plants would probably be built, including advanced packaging facilities, joining eight fabs already under construction or planned. The expansion could eventually give the Arizona campus 10 fabs and two packaging plants.

Building and equipping a leading-edge 2nm fab can cost between $25 billion and $35 billion, meaning the additional investment is enough for roughly four facilities.

Advanced packaging is also an big part of the commitment. Capacity for technologies such as CoWoS remains one of the biggest constraints on AI accelerator production. Adding packaging operations in Arizona would allow TSMC's US customers to obtain advanced chips manufactured and packaged domestically.

Credit: App Economy Insights

The announcement followed another huge quarter for the world's largest contract chipmaker. TSMC's second-quarter net profit surged 77% year-over-year to a record NT$706.6 billion, around $22 billion, beating analyst expectations of NT$632.6 billion. It was the company's ninth consecutive quarter of double-digit profit growth.

TSMC also increased its 2026 capital spending forecast from the upper end of its previous $52 billion to $56 billion range to between $60 billion and $64 billion. The company expects full-year revenue in US dollar terms to rise by slightly more than 40%, up from its previous forecast of more than 30%.

It was recently reported that TSMC generated $39.6 billion in second-quarter revenue, up 36% year-over-year, as June sales jumped 68%. The latest results and spending plans reinforce the belief that demand for AI chips remains extremely strong, despite ongoing concerns that hyperscalers could eventually discover they have built more infrastructure than they need.

Wei said TSMC remains highly confident in the multi-year AI trend, though he acknowledged that combining every customer's forecast would exaggerate real demand. For now, however, the company is preparing for years of continued growth.

Permalink to story:

 
If you oppose the profitability of these semiconductor companies, then supply issues will only be extended. TSMC wouldn't be able to invest $100 billion in Arizona to make American chips, and shortages will only continue. Instead, you should avoid buying new devices if you cannot justify paying for the high prices.

The article does not make this clear. It mentions $64 billion dollars of planned annual capital expenditures and then shows $18B of net profit. To be clear, net profit does not include capital expenditures. Annualizing the net profit ($18B*4Q = $72B profit) shows that TSMC plans to spend almost its entire profit on capital expenditures (the remaining $8B made in 2026 will likely pay for financing costs and supplement cash reserves).

So for the people claiming semiconductor companies are abusing their market position to make high profits, how do you reconcile that with the fact that nearly all of their profit is going out the door to build out more supply? Are you suggesting you WANT continued shortages because not always selling "cheap memory" should be illegal?
 
If you oppose the profitability of these semiconductor companies, then supply issues will only be extended. TSMC wouldn't be able to invest $100 billion in Arizona to make American chips, and shortages will only continue. Instead, you should avoid buying new devices if you cannot justify paying for the high prices.

The article does not make this clear. It mentions $64 billion dollars of planned annual capital expenditures and then shows $18B of net profit. To be clear, net profit does not include capital expenditures. Annualizing the net profit ($18B*4Q = $72B profit) shows that TSMC plans to spend almost its entire profit on capital expenditures (the remaining $8B made in 2026 will likely pay for financing costs and supplement cash reserves).

So for the people claiming semiconductor companies are abusing their market position to make high profits, how do you reconcile that with the fact that nearly all of their profit is going out the door to build out more supply? Are you suggesting you WANT continued shortages because not always selling "cheap memory" should be illegal?
I don't think anyone is against profitability, that's the main motivator for bringing us new products and to keep companies competing with each other. What people are tired of is the accounting tricks that allow these companies to syphon off billions of dollars to make it look like on paper that are far less profitable than they are while everyone but the consumers and general employees have their hands in the cookie jar
 
Looking forward to supply catching up to demand. Papa wants a new rig by the end of 2027.
I need a new travel laptop and I refuse to buy anything with less than 64GB of ram and im not paying $1000+ just for ram. Everything is soldered on in laptops today and the brings me around to "im not paying $1200-1500 for a laptop that only has 16gigs of ram in it if I can't add more later". I get it that this stuff is expensive, but launching anything today with 8gigs of soldered on memory is just manufactured ewaste.
 
I need a new travel laptop and I refuse to buy anything with less than 64GB of ram and im not paying $1000+ just for ram. Everything is soldered on in laptops today and the brings me around to "im not paying $1200-1500 for a laptop that only has 16gigs of ram in it if I can't add more later". I get it that this stuff is expensive, but launching anything today with 8gigs of soldered on memory is just manufactured ewaste.
My recommendation if you have a PC with power and memory is to use a laptop as a thin client for it. If you want to use it for gaming on the other hand, you might need to rely on cloud gaming to hold you over until prices come down.

Otherwise if you really need that much RAM, see if you can get something from a business that’s been surplussed. Yes it’ll be secondhand and not ideal for every workload, but policy is often to upgrade after just 2 or 3 years. If you happen to know someone working at an IT department then this is a solid alternative.
 
My recommendation if you have a PC with power and memory is to use a laptop as a thin client for it. If you want to use it for gaming on the other hand, you might need to rely on cloud gaming to hold you over until prices come down.

Otherwise if you really need that much RAM, see if you can get something from a business that’s been surplussed. Yes it’ll be secondhand and not ideal for every workload, but policy is often to upgrade after just 2 or 3 years. If you happen to know someone working at an IT department then this is a solid alternative.
So I've been doing things a bit backwards lately. My steam deck has more GPU power than my laptop so I cast games from my steam deck to my laptop. It's *fine* for now, but when you spend 8-9 months a year on the road, *fine* isn't really the level of comfort I'm looking for when I'm living out of hotel rooms. I'm in Orlando for the foreseeable future and I haven't even been given a return date. I'll probably get to go home around thanksgiving and come back early January unless I get posted somewhere else.

If I could get a steam controller I would just keep my steamdeck docked to the TV as my hotel room.TV is either on comedy Central watching South Park/the office or the weather channel. And, sure people would probably kill to be paid to spend months in my shoes, but sometimes you just want to get off work and retreat into some game. I've been playing a lot of Baldurs Gate 3 lately and it would be nice if I could crank and graphics up. I was actually going to replace my laptop last Christmas but that was at the start of the ram crisis. Refused to pay that much for RAM and then I watched it quadruple after saying thar. I have a feeling it won't be untill Christmas of 2027 when I get a new one.

I will probably fold and get one. It's fairly common for me to be out of town for a few weeks to a month, but this is only the second time I've been sent away without a return date.
 
Back