UK porn viewers ditch age-verified sites for rule-breakers without ID checks

midian182

Posts: 11,836   +179
Staff member
Facepalm: How frustrating must it feel to comply with a law only to be financially punished for doing so, while those who flout it are rewarded. That's what's happening in the UK, where the country's recent age verification rules have seen sites implementing the measures lose traffic to those that don't.

In July, the UK Online Safety Act mandated that sites featuring adult content, which covers the likes of pornography sites and even social media platforms, must introduce effective age-checking systems. That means "click here if you're over 18" popups no longer suffice – visitors must hand over selfies, government IDs, or other forms of official identification.

Most of the major porn sites like Pornhub and Xhamster have since introduced age verification systems to adhere to the law, though there are others which haven't, often because they can't afford to, are worried about visitor numbers falling, or just don't care about the UK's rules.

Regulator Ofcom has the power to impose fines of up to £18 million ($24.1 million) or 10% of worldwide revenue on companies that refuse to comply with the mandate. Senior managers at these firms could also be criminally liable if they repeatedly ignore the rules and may face up to two years in jail, forcing some firms to stop offering their services entirely in the country.

It shouldn't be too surprising to learn that despite third-party age-verification companies promising not to retain users' data or being able to see the pages they visit, many people aren't keen on handing over identifying information or facial scans before they indulge their foot fetish (or whatever). While VPNs are always an option, many porn lovers are simply no longer visiting sites with age verification barriers and instead are seeking out those that don't abide by the stipulations.

The Washington Post found evidence of this theory. It examined the top 90 porn sites based on UK IP data using rankings platform Similarweb. It found that 14 of them still don't have extensive age-checking systems, and sure enough, traffic to these rule-breakers has exploded over the last two months – one of the sites' UK-based visits actually doubled. There's little doubt a lot of this traffic comes from competitors that now have ID checks, meaning they are losing visitors, ad revenue, and money from having to pay for these systems.

Ofcom is already investigating four companies which collectively run 34 pornography sites over whether they have implemented effective age-checking measures. And while there is a petition with over 533,000 names to repeal the Online Safety Act, you can guarantee that it'll never happen.

It's not just the UK where age checks are causing concern. In the US, their increased use is raising questions about security, privacy, and the shifting boundaries of internet freedom.

Permalink to story:

 
Porn is a hot topic here at Techspot.
That's because all over the world they're trying to censor more and more information. They're starting with porn because that's an easy target, but it could be only a matter of time before they start with social networks and news outlets. Once a precedent is set using stuff like porn it lays the groundwork to censor other information. Before you know it they'll be doing age verification checks to read about History. And it's not just about protecting kids, it's about collecting information and see who's looking at what.
 
That's because all over the world they're trying to censor more and more information. They're starting with porn because that's an easy target, but it could be only a matter of time before they start with social networks and news outlets. Once a precedent is set using stuff like porn it lays the groundwork to censor other information. Before you know it they'll be doing age verification checks to read about History. And it's not just about protecting kids, it's about collecting information and see who's looking at what.

I am not disagreeing but don't you think they already know what you're looking at? Pretty sure if GCHQ wanted they could tell.
 
I am not disagreeing but don't you think they already know what you're looking at? Pretty sure if GCHQ wanted they could tell.
it's still obfuscated a bit. What this does is that porn hub verfies your ID by checking your ID against a government list, they get a handshake back saying "it's okay for this person to view this content". It'll start with things like pornhub, but the UK is also starting problems with other websites like 4chan. Regardless of what you think about content that is found on 4chan, this is an attempt to suppress free speech and access to information
 
That's because all over the world they're trying to censor more and more information. They're starting with porn because that's an easy target, but it could be only a matter of time before they start with social networks and news outlets.
Pure drivel.
 
That's because all over the world they're trying to censor more and more information. They're starting with porn because that's an easy target, but it could be only a matter of time before they start with social networks and news outlets. Once a precedent is set using stuff like porn it lays the groundwork to censor other information. Before you know it they'll be doing age verification checks to read about History. And it's not just about protecting kids, it's about collecting information and see who's looking at what.
Porn isn't information, and its linked plenty to issues with intimacy in relationships, and is a leading cause of divorce, it has no actistic value or societal value. As for the UK they should go after the owners of these sites, while also instructing ISP's and VPNs to block them or risk having the ISP banned and the VPN itself banned from doing bussiness in the UK, which isn't that hard its as simple as telling the banks this VPN provider is no longer allowed to do bussiness with the UK thus blocking credit card charges, and with the global banking industry finally getting porn adverse again its likely your going to start seeing banks refuse to do bussiness with VPN's that market or assist with bypassing porn blocks.

At the end of the day, what really needs to happen is to pressure the banks to deplatform the adult industry and any company that cooperates with them.
 
Porn isn't information, and its linked plenty to issues with intimacy in relationships, and is a leading cause of divorce, it has no actistic value or societal value. As for the UK they should go after the owners of these sites, while also instructing ISP's and VPNs to block them or risk having the ISP banned and the VPN itself banned from doing bussiness in the UK, which isn't that hard its as simple as telling the banks this VPN provider is no longer allowed to do bussiness with the UK thus blocking credit card charges, and with the global banking industry finally getting porn adverse again its likely your going to start seeing banks refuse to do bussiness with VPN's that market or assist with bypassing porn blocks.

At the end of the day, what really needs to happen is to pressure the banks to deplatform the adult industry and any company that cooperates with them.
Thats neat. So cigarettes are banned, right? Since they are linked to actual death? Oh.
 
"And while there is a petition with over 533,000 names to repeal the Online Safety Act, you can guarantee that it'll never happen."

Can we? It might not happen anytime soon, but I'd be far more likely to believe that it WILL eventually be repealed vs it will never be...

One thing I CAN guarantee is that you CAN'T guarantee ANYTHING (except that 100% of people who exercise will die).

Porn isn't information, and its linked plenty to issues with intimacy in relationships, and is a leading cause of divorce, it has no actistic value or societal value. As for the UK they should go after the owners of these sites, while also instructing ISP's and VPNs to block them or risk having the ISP banned and the VPN itself banned from doing bussiness in the UK, which isn't that hard its as simple as telling the banks this VPN provider is no longer allowed to do bussiness with the UK thus blocking credit card charges, and with the global banking industry finally getting porn adverse again its likely your going to start seeing banks refuse to do bussiness with VPN's that market or assist with bypassing porn blocks.

At the end of the day, what really needs to happen is to pressure the banks to deplatform the adult industry and any company that cooperates with them.
It's LINKED - but there is zero proof. EVERYTHING can be linked to ANYTHING.

Maybe take off your puritan goggles for a minute and realize that CONSENSUAL porn is harmless - but I assume you're someone who thinks that you should be a virgin until marriage and if you commit adultery, you'll go to h3ll...
 
Porn...it has no actistic value or societal value.

According to what criteria? (No, I ain't askin....)

I could banish the majority of Culture.

And, you ain't seen my videos. Then you'd run in fear of my godliness, or bow down to it in UTTER RECOGNITION OF DIVINITY. ((Like those Dumpian capitals and all?...except I ain't lyin, beau. --- You can thank Samuel L. Jackson for inspiring me.))
 
There are a lot of guys here that have a more meaningful relationship with their hand then a wife and will defend that to the end. Porn serves no purpose other than to ruin lives of the participants.
Average Life Expectancy Of A Porn Star = 37.43 years

Average Life Expectancy Of An American = 78.1 years
 
There are a lot of guys here that have a more meaningful relationship with their hand then a wife and will defend that to the end. Porn serves no purpose other than to ruin lives of the participants.
Average Life Expectancy Of A Porn Star = 37.43 years

Average Life Expectancy Of An American = 78.1 years
Love to see some evidence for that…

As for life expectancy, that number is pulled from ONE study - and they only used 129 deceased porn stars… not exactly statistically significant.
 
Pornhub parent company Aylo and its affiliates have settled a lawsuit filed by the FTC and the state of Utah, which alleged that the company “deceived users” about the presence of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and non-consensual material (NCM) on its websites. The porn kingpin settled the suit for a paltry $5 million.
 
Pornhub parent company Aylo and its affiliates have settled a lawsuit filed by the FTC and the state of Utah, which alleged that the company “deceived users” about the presence of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and non-consensual material (NCM) on its websites. The porn kingpin settled the suit for a paltry $5 million.
Not sure how that helps your claim that CONSENSUAL porn is detrimental to society... No one was advocating for child pornography here... at least... I hope they weren't...
 
Not sure how that helps your claim that CONSENSUAL porn is detrimental to society... No one was advocating for child pornography here... at least... I hope they weren't...
It's a claim against porn. Like many things bad it progressively gets worse. Here is proof. Thanks for the reply
 
It's a claim against porn. Like many things bad it progressively gets worse. Here is proof. Thanks for the reply
Yet your post just gave a sample of child porn… porn itself ISN’T bad… naturally, there are some scumballs who use it to profit… that goes for just about everything though - you gonna claim football is bad cause some of the NFL owners are scum?
 
Yet your post just gave a sample of child porn… porn itself ISN’T bad… naturally, there are some scumballs who use it to profit… that goes for just about everything though - you gonna claim football is bad cause some of the NFL owners are scum?
Porn is bad is what I am claiming.
 
Back