UK Royal Navy tests its 40-foot submarine drone that can be operated from 10,000 miles away

midian182

Posts: 11,725   +177
Staff member
What just happened? New details on the UK Royal Navy's massive submarine drone, Excalibur, have been revealed. Measuring 40 feet long and 6.5 feet wide, the 19-tonne Extra-Large Uncrewed Underwater Vehicle (XLUUV) is capable of being remotely operated from distances beyond 10,000 miles – effectively from "the other side of the world."

Developed by technology firm MSubs from Plymouth under the UK's Project Cetus, Excalibur was unveiled in May and is the largest uncrewed submarine in Royal Navy history. It's been purpose-built for long-endurance operations, seabed warfare, and surveillance missions in contested or denied environments.

In a recent series of trials, conducted under the AUKUS Pillar II framework and integrated into the Exercise Talisman Sabre war games, Australian operators successfully controlled Excalibur remotely from more than 10,000 miles away.

The trials, held in waters near Papua New Guinea, included participation from the US, Australia, and the UK, as well as observers from France, Japan, and South Korea, highlighting the strategic significance of the project.

While Excalibur is primarily a technology demonstrator, industry analysts suggest its payload capacity could be used for deploying sensors or other equipment, enhancing undersea surveillance and anti-submarine warfare capabilities.

This initiative is part of a broader trend among Western navies toward autonomous underwater systems, such as the US Navy's Orca XLUUV and similar programs in Australia and France. These systems are viewed as cost-effective, high-value complements to traditional, crewed submarines.

As Excalibur continues its two-year testing phase, defense officials emphasize its role in the Royal Navy's shift toward a hybrid fleet of manned and unmanned systems. The successful long-distance operation demonstrates both rapid technological advancement and growing interoperability among AUKUS partners.

The UK's Ministry of Defence has also pursued other uncrewed undersea tools, such as ROVs equipped with sensors and explosives, to counteract threats posed by Russia to undersea infrastructure.

Last week, Finland charged crew members of what is believed to be a Russian "shadow fleet" tanker with dragging its anchor to cut undersea cables between Finland and Estonia in 2024.

Last December, NATO said it was planning to deploy a fleet of unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) designed to patrol critical naval zones and protect undersea telecom infrastructure located on the seabed in regions like the Baltic and Mediterranean.

Permalink to story:

 
Uncrewed novel tech is good, in theory, but I see issues with reliability; what if something breaks down? there's no one there to fix it. Can we be certain security was implemented for remote piloting? it'd be sucky if the new toy could be easily hacked and controlled by anyone ... 10,000 miles away.
 
This badly needs a quantum communication channel, to eliminate distance + depth + security factors at the same time.
 
Last edited:
Uncrewed novel tech is good, in theory, but I see issues with reliability; what if something breaks down? there's no one there to fix it. Can we be certain security was implemented for remote piloting? it'd be sucky if the new toy could be easily hacked and controlled by anyone ... 10,000 miles away.
No crew also means fewer things to break just in general. And no crew also means you can deploy as many as you can build, rather than as many as you can man with trained sailors - if one breaks, either self-destruct it, or send something else to go fish it out of the drink.
 
No way it can be steered or otherwise controlled while submerged at depths suitable for stealth. VLF communication is way too slow.
Indeed the photo shows it at periscope depth.
Perhaps it could gain enough info about the environmental situation then get up to communicate it to the control center and to wait for more commands.
 
No way it can be steered or otherwise controlled while submerged at depths suitable for stealth. VLF communication is way too slow.
Indeed the photo shows it at periscope depth.
Perhaps it could gain enough info about the environmental situation then get up to communicate it to the control center and to wait for more commands.
Before GPS subs used dead reckoning when submerged. It's an estimate of a vehicle's current position given the last known position, time, speed, depth, and course heading. Periodically, the vehicle would need to emerge and obtain visual references to make course corrections.
Non-GPS submarine navigational aids are Sonar depth soundings (comparing seabead formations to maps), inertial navigation systems (gyros, accelerometers, and math (trig/calculus) to calculate position), periscope fixes (rising to periscope depth for visual landmark or star references.
 
Uncrewed novel tech is good, in theory, but I see issues with reliability; what if something breaks down? there's no one there to fix it. Can we be certain security was implemented for remote piloting? it'd be sucky if the new toy could be easily hacked and controlled by anyone ... 10,000 miles away.
Yes, we can. Early in my career I developed military grade hardware encryption systems which I am sure this system is using. They usually have multiple encryption layers encapsulating the messages. To date none of the encryption systems I have worked have been compromised.

The biggest issue is what does the system do if it can't communicate with anything, hopefully the answer is return to a predetermined location.
 
Why not build water infrastructure in Africa for actual utility and QoL improvement. War apparently has a higher ROI than improving living standards of society.
 
Why not build water infrastructure in Africa for actual utility and QoL improvement. War apparently has a higher ROI than improving living standards of society.
And that would be fine if you could do it while your adversary was doing something equally utopian. Unfortunately things aren't that way.
 
"UK Royal Navy tests its 40-foot submarine drone that can be operated from 10,000 miles away"

Nice slow moving Target for Russian and Chinese anti submarine naval vessels...!
 
Why not build water infrastructure in Africa for actual utility and QoL improvement. War apparently has a higher ROI than improving living standards of society.

The living of people. The simplest language, yo.


And that would be fine if you could do it while your adversary was doing something equally utopian. Unfortunately things aren't that way.


Supportive of life. Descriptions rather than terms, yo.
 
Before GPS subs used dead reckoning when submerged. It's an estimate of a vehicle's current position given the last known position, time, speed, depth, and course heading. Periodically, the vehicle would need to emerge and obtain visual references to make course corrections.
Non-GPS submarine navigational aids are Sonar depth soundings (comparing seabead formations to maps), inertial navigation systems (gyros, accelerometers, and math (trig/calculus) to calculate position), periscope fixes (rising to periscope depth for visual landmark or star references.
Yes, but what I was saying is there are no people aboard, therefore it must be operated remotely, and this is impossible while it is submerged enough to be hidden. AI still can't replace men/women.
 
Yes, but what I was saying is there are no people aboard, therefore it must be operated remotely, and this is impossible while it is submerged enough to be hidden. AI still can't replace men/women.
Dead reckoning could be preprogrammed, then algos for if in this location change direction and/or speed by this much. Slight adjustments can be accounted for within anticipated deviation experienced with tidal changes (head/tail/crossflows). Remote control could be one way to achieve the desired result, but it wouldn't necessarily be required.
 
Back