That may have a small bit of truth to it, the point being is that most people are picking for "oh cool case"... if we were voting on who had the coolest or not the most common of cases, then I could understand the complete lopsided voting going on... but this is suppose to be more about who's system is the most deserving and that IMH would be Joel. And I would almost hazard to bet anyone not a teenager and more tech savvy individuals would pick Joel as well. Just like last week... lopside more people voted for "cool case".
So again... I think Steve is a better choice for picking the actual winner of the upgrades and maybe he could keep the voting system but use it for a runner-up who instead wins the weekly prize he typically randomly gives out. I think that would make more sense and the person whose system actually needs the upgrade will get it. Just my 2 cents.