OpenAI may give the US government a 5% stake, following Trump's Intel playbook

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,010   +58
Staff
Rumor mill: OpenAI is weighing a plan to give the US government a direct financial stake in the company, as artificial intelligence becomes as much a political issue as a technological one. The $852 billion AI startup has discussed offering the federal government a 5% equity stake, according to two people familiar with the talks. The discussions are still in the early, largely conceptual stage, but they reflect OpenAI's effort to respond to mounting scrutiny from Washington over its most advanced systems.

Chief executive Sam Altman has argued that the public should share in the economic gains created by AI. In discussions with policymakers, he suggested that a government stake could help distribute those financial gains more broadly while improving relations between the industry and regulators.

The proposal is not limited to OpenAI. Altman and other executives have floated the idea of leading US AI companies each contributing 5% of their equity to a fund modeled on Alaska's Permanent Fund, which invests the state's oil revenues and pays dividends to the government and residents. Whether other companies – such as Anthropic, Google, or Meta – would agree to such an arrangement remains unclear.

The proposal comes as AI developers face a more challenging regulatory environment. In Washington, concerns have grown about the infrastructure required for advanced AI, from sprawling data centers to potential impacts on jobs and cybersecurity. OpenAI and Anthropic have both faced delays in releasing new models amid US regulatory scrutiny. At the same time, some Republican lawmakers and advisers to President Trump have called for tighter oversight of the sector.

People familiar with the discussions say Altman has raised the idea of public ownership with Trump, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. He has also spoken with Senator Bernie Sanders, who has suggested that roughly half of each major US AI company should be owned through a sovereign wealth fund.

The notion of shared ownership is not new inside OpenAI. In April, the company outlined a proposal for a "public wealth fund" that "provides every citizen – including those not invested in financial markets – with a stake in AI-driven economic growth."

Its nonprofit arm, the OpenAI Foundation, echoed that idea in May, saying society will likely need new approaches to give people lasting stakes in the systems that create value. "The goal is not only to support people through economic change after decisions have already been made, but to give them a stake and a voice in shaping how that change unfolds," the foundation said in a blog post.

Any deal to give the government equity would likely require an act of Congress, the people said. For now, discussions remain preliminary.

The talks come as OpenAI and Anthropic move toward potential public listings. Both companies are exploring IPOs, moves that would broaden ownership and generate significant returns for existing investors. OpenAI's IPO is not expected until next year.

There is already a recent example of the government taking an equity stake in a major tech company. After initially criticizing Intel's leadership, Trump later backed the chipmaker following a deal that gave the federal government a 10% stake. The Intel arrangement has helped normalize the idea that Washington could take stakes in other companies it considers strategically important.

OpenAI declined to comment. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Permalink to story:

 
This is quite interesting. It's a win for taxpayers if the government receives money - it's essentially a permanent extra 5% tax on the company.
 
WTAF. Snake oil corporate feudalism masquerading as democracy.

Absolutely NO corporation hands over a $42 billion cut of their company out of the goodness of their heart—even if it’s just current valuation smoke. This "public fund" talk is pure corporate PR manure masking a textbook power-grab and moat-building scheme.

When a company binds its financial success to the state's balance sheet, corruption becomes the official business model. It creates a perverse incentive structure: the U.S. government will actively protect OpenAI from antitrust laws, data privacy crackdowns, and copyright lawsuits because hurting OpenAI would mean tanking its own multi-billion-dollar state asset.

By giving Uncle Sam a financial stake, OpenAI buys regulatory immunity, fast-tracks its IPO next year, and effectively pulls up the ladder on smaller open-source competitors. It is a raw, calculated trade of equity for state protection and market monopoly.

This, folks, is unbridled corruption in action being played out in full view. Sure Sammy, sell us a miracle cure for societal inequality while secretly securing a corporate dictatorship. Reptile.
 
*Socialism. There are no private or publicly owned companies under Communism, only state owned ones.
*Nazism.

Nazism utilized a modified form of corporatism by destroying independent labor unions and replacing them with a state-run front that integrated workers and employers into a single vertical hierarchy. This structure allowed private industrialists to retain ownership and profits under the Führerprinzip (Leader Principle), provided they completely subordinated their production goals to the state's totalitarian and militaristic demands.
 
*Nazism.

Nazism utilized a modified form of corporatism by destroying independent labor unions and replacing them with a state-run front that integrated workers and employers into a single vertical hierarchy. This structure allowed private industrialists to retain ownership and profits under the Führerprinzip (Leader Principle), provided they completely subordinated their production goals to the state's totalitarian and militaristic demands.
Except that hasn't happened here, they have not destroyed a labor union nor have they established a vertical hierarchy. also you're missing the Jew hating part, which Trump nor his administration is part of. His opposition, otoh, they REALLY seem to want Israel wiped off the earth. Hmmmm........

Another example would be Intel, which the US government also has a stake in, which still supplies CPUs for servers around the world, including countries that dont particularly like us.

That TDS is some strong stuff. You know what's weird, nobody was calling Obama a not-see when they bailed out the automakers, when by your own definition that would be closer to "nazism" since it placed immense pressure on the UAW and resulted in fewer American jobs. Strange, isnt that? Yet when the Trump admin takes positions in companies without taking American jobs, he is labeled a Nazi.

Almost like "nazi" has an actual definition but people get really emotional over trump and just throw any negative label they can find at him regardless if it fits or not, totally undermining any power that label may have had.
Is this some sneaky way to get public money to bail them out of their massive debts?
Likely a major part. Funding is starting to dry up and investors will want their money back eventually, and 401ks have not jumped on bailing out private equity like the government hoped. Those datacenters wont fund themselves, and if the government wants to use them for mass surveillance, then they will want ownership of them.
 
Except that hasn't happened here, they have not destroyed a labor union nor have they established a vertical hierarchy. also you're missing the Jew hating part, which Trump nor his administration is part of. His opposition, otoh, they REALLY seem to want Israel wiped off the earth. Hmmmm........

Another example would be Intel, which the US government also has a stake in, which still supplies CPUs for servers around the world, including countries that dont particularly like us.

That TDS is some strong stuff. You know what's weird, nobody was calling Obama a not-see when they bailed out the automakers, when by your own definition that would be closer to "nazism" since it placed immense pressure on the UAW and resulted in fewer American jobs. Strange, isnt that? Yet when the Trump admin takes positions in companies without taking American jobs, he is labeled a Nazi.

Almost like "nazi" has an actual definition but people get really emotional over trump and just throw any negative label they can find at him regardless if it fits or not, totally undermining any power that label may have had.
oh, Im not saying Trump is nazi. Nor he is socislist or whatever. Someone mention communism because of some similarities, you said it is socialism based on other similarities, and I just shown some other similarities. But then, your response made it not so simple:

"they have not destroyed a labor union"
https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/12/twists-and-turns-trumps-2025-war-unions/410356/
"Trump signed an executive order banning unions across 40 agencies under the auspices of national security"

"nor have they established a vertical hierarchy"
CEOs of larger corporations on a call? Implementing any request potus has? willingly giving part of their companies to a single leader?

"you're missing the Jew hating part"
There never was Jew hating part. Nazis had to create an inner enemy to consolidate population against easy to identify group inside country, to push draconian limitation to the personal freedom of citizens to fight imaginary enemy. They decided on Jews as they were easy to identify, often wealthy, so a lot of people was jealous of them, so that was an easy target. Only if US had a easy to identify minority group which is easy to target and gov could put all the blame for own incompetence... ;)

"opposition, otoh, they REALLY seem to want Israel wiped off the earth"
I think it is Trump, after unnecessary war with Iran he created, is feed up of israel. Now, while I fully agree with some Israeli actions against Hesbollah, they as well are perpetrators of Palestinian genocide. They were constantly pushing them for last 40 years, culminating with Gaza devastation. Again, this has nothing to do with nazi or fascism (in fact the israeli blaming all palestinian and killing whole families are more nazi like behaviour), as fascism/nazizm ideology is not about being agains Jews, but, in generel, selected minorities to appeal masses. Whatever those minorities are.

"which the US government also has a stake in"
oh, so vertical hierarchy?:)

"You know what's weird, nobody was calling Obama a not-see when they bailed out the automakers, when by your own definition that would be closer to "nazism" since it placed immense pressure on the UAW and resulted in fewer American jobs."
that makes no sense. Sure, US has weird approach to the socialism - using citizen tax money to help citizen is a communism, but using citizen tax money to help oligarchs is wonderful idea (kinda like slaves period;) ). But, this is pure whataboutism. I don't care about Obama, and I see no connection between bailing the companies so uaw can exist and directly closing 40 union organization by Trump. we are here and now, and I never brought Obama to this picture. I simply highlighted some key points of Nazi definition, and your response shows that you as well connected the dots.

"Yet when the Trump admin takes positions in companies without taking American jobs, he is labeled a Nazi"
Don't you see a difference between taking the citizen money to bail out the company, and taking citizen money to bail out the companies and at the same time establish the position, ownership, and vertical hierarchy? If government owns a company, and if the gov owned company is in a conflict with not a gov owned company, who is going to win?

And again, I just put some key definition, I didn't mention trump or whatever, you connected the dots and picture you got made you coming with all those assumption. It is you, not me. You see the picture, and you don't like it. But it is a picture you created yourself.
 
Altman's greed is bigger than himself, I have no doubt he would sell his mother as long as he can reach his goals. He can be put right next to Trump , Elon Musk, Zuckerberg, and Bessos, as one of the top 5 most dangerous individuals.
 
Lol, nothing more than a back door bail out for a company falling even further behind the competition. Funny thing is seeing the gullible morons protecting their cult leader
 
Imo this is actually a step in the right direction.

Future Presidents (or even this one) will be able to use ownership stakes in corporations to replace elements of their board or direct corporate policy without needing to deal with irksome laws/regulation/lawsuits.

Today it might just be simple grift, but In the future it could really be a powerful tool to direct corporate policy.
 
Back