US government publishes annual unclassified report on unidentified aerial phenomena

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,289   +192
Staff member
Editor's take: A key takeaway occurs on page three. In a footnote, it is mentioned that the definition of UAP has been expanded to include air, sea and transmedium objects. In a later index of key terms, transmedium objects or devices are those observed to transition between space and the atmosphere, or between the atmosphere and bodies of water, and are not immediately identifiable.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) has published its 2022 annual report on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), the government's new phrase for UFOs. In addition to the 144 UAP reports covered in the ODNI's preliminary assessment from June 2021, there have been an additional 247 new reports and another 119 that were either since discovered or reported outside the preliminary collection period.

As of August 30, 2022, a total of 510 UAP reports have been cataloged and even more information is supplied in the classified version of this report, the agency said.

According to an initial analysis, 26 reports where characterized as unmanned aircraft system (UAS) or UAS-like entities, 163 were characterized as balloon or balloon-like entities and six were attributed to clutter (birds, weather events, or airborne debris like plastic bags). Notably, initial characterization does not mean positively resolved or unidentified.

The ODNI and the newly established All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), which will serve as the DoD's focal point for UAP, will use the initial characterization to efficiently and effectively leverage resources against the remaining 171 uncharacterized and unattributed UAP reports, some of which appear to have demonstrated unusual flight characteristics or performance capabilities that require further analysis.

The ODNI and AARO acknowledge that a select number of UAP incidents may be attributable to sensor irregularities or variances, such as operator or equipment error.

The report further notes that the majority of new UAP reports originate from US Navy and US Air Force aviators and operators, and that UAP pose a safety of flight and collision hazard due to their unauthorized presence in restricted airspace. To date, however, there have been no reported collisions between US aircraft and UAP.

What's more, no encounters with UAP have been confirmed to contribute directly to adverse health-related effects to the observer(s) but AARO will continue to track any reported health issues related to incidents should they occur at a later date.

Related reading: NASA is assembling an independent team to study unidentified aerial phenomena

The 12-page unclassified report was due out no later than October 31, 2022, and annually thereafter until October 31, 2026, as per a requirement established in Section 1683 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022.

It's worth reiterating that this public release is the unclassified version of the report. Per Appendix A, the report is to include a detailed breakdown of each reported event although none of that is present here and has presumably been saved for the classified version for authorized eyes only.

Image credit: Stefan Stefancik

Permalink to story.

 
Its about time that the stigma associated with military people reporting such events seems to have been effectively removed. IMO, this should have happened years ago especially for those reports that defy identification. IMO, it is not likely that military personnel would report birds or Venus as UAP.
 
UAP are real, we need to remain vigilant and investigate credible sightings.

One great thing about cellphones, most people have them so we're bound to have more and more videos/evidence in the future. These may not be the most credible sightings but experts can wade through the chaff and show us the real ones that cannot be explained.

Anyone see the flying pyramids video?
 
UAP are real, we need to remain vigilant and investigate credible sightings.

One great thing about cellphones, most people have them so we're bound to have more and more videos/evidence in the future. These may not be the most credible sightings but experts can wade through the chaff and show us the real ones that cannot be explained.

Anyone see the flying pyramids video?
Is this the video
If not, please post a link. Thanks.

There have been reports of pyramid shaped UFOs for many years.

I used to have a bumper sticker "UFOs exist, the Air Force isn't real" 🤣
 
One great thing about cellphones, most people have them so we're bound to have more and more videos/evidence in the future.

LOL! In the future??

Over a BILLION smartphones have been sold each year for the past decade and *still* no good evidence shows up.

Now whyever could that be?🤔🤔🤔
 
Last edited:
LOL! In the future??

Over a BILLION smartphones have been sold each year for the past decade and *still* no good evidence shows up.

Now whyever could that be?🤔🤔🤔
Fairly easy as most cell phones have cheap cameras in them don't have great photo/recording capabilities. Now if everyone had a iPhone or a high end Samsung, that be a different story but that's just not the case.

There will always be some type of answer in favor or not if UFOs/UAPs exist. No one truly has evidence either way that the mass is willing to accept. Some believe, some don't. Same goes for reglion. Some believe in God, some don't.
Remember, just because you can't see it does not mean it doesn't exist.
 
Fairly easy as most cell phones have cheap cameras in them don't have great photo/recording capabilities. Now if everyone had a iPhone or a high end Samsung, that be a different story but that's just not the case.

There will always be some type of answer in favor or not if UFOs/UAPs exist. No one truly has evidence either way that the mass is willing to accept. Some believe, some don't. Same goes for reglion. Some believe in God, some don't.
Remember, just because you can't see it does not mean it doesn't exist.

Where's all the crappy UFO video then? There should be deluges of it. Orders of magnitude more than pre-2010. And there are about a billion iPhones in use based on the last 5 years of sales, that's enough to find some good UFO video. Yet.... none.

You cannot prove a negative, but when the evidence for the negative state is so overwhelming or evidence for the positive claim is continually lacking, that positive claim ceases to be relevant to most people.
 
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ufo+video

Clearly your assertion that there is none is incorrect.

Military using iPhones now? OKOK, platform agnostic: Samsungs too, maybe Pixels for low light. What kinda Instagram filter you need to get that grainy footage?

Weird that UFOs only show up in military footage when military cameras are outnumbered by several orders of magnitude by everyone else with a smartphone.🤔

Maybe the aliens are all vampires so they don't show up on all these back-illuminated CMOS sensors! Mystery solved.
 
Where's all the crappy UFO video then? There should be deluges of it. Orders of magnitude more than pre-2010. And there are about a billion iPhones in use based on the last 5 years of sales, that's enough to find some good UFO video. Yet.... none.

You cannot prove a negative, but when the evidence for the negative state is so overwhelming or evidence for the positive claim is continually lacking, that positive claim ceases to be relevant to most people.
Theres been plenty of evidence from photos, vids, witnesses over years. Whether you choose to believe the evidence is up to you. Seeing is believing but yet millions believe in God but never hear or see him.
Millions believe in UFOs/UAPs. They believe they saw something or in some cases have been abducted. Were they, its not all fake nor are all lying.

Believe whatever you like.
 
There are actually tons of UFO sightings. But you can't record that by phone if the object is at high altitude. Phones have zero optical zoom and digital zoom is just a crop function that reduces image resolution. Which means, useless.

Now, a 4K video camera with at least 50x optical zoom, plus a tripod, is a good start. You need a tripod to reduce enormous camera shake at 50x zoom.

This is why military equipment can easily outnumber cellphones, because I'm not aware of many people who carry an external 50x zoom lens with a tripod attached to their cellphone. On the other hand, military equipment can track objects, zoom them and keep them in focus even if they are 50 km away, while moving at high speed. No cellphone can do that.

French Air Force has released a document with thousands of UFO sightings long time ago. The witnesses were professional pilots, radar operators and ground staff. They excluded all explicable cases, but there were still thousands of those that couldn't be explained. For example, objects that move at speeds that far exceed anything military or experimental jets can do, doing maneuvers that no known manned or unmanned military object is capable of (including missiles). Russians have their own database of such events.

Here's a very famous sighting confirmed by a high number of credible witnesses from 2006:
 
Before even Rosewell, there was the Battle of LA, no not the movie. Before that there was the Russian incident over I believe the Black Forrest area.
Most don't even know that the crash at Rosewell wasn't even at Rosewell but 75 miles away. On top of that, that wasn't even the only crash in the area. As many as 7 crashes took place I believe.

Is it all real, again some belive it is, some don't.

People can believe whatever they like but millions of people are simply not making things or lying. BTW, ufos/uaps does not mean Aliens. Keep that in mind. Yes it's possible that crafts have come here but does it mean they were manned? There is less evidence of that vs a UFO. Maybe the crafts are unmanned or maybe just maybe we don't have the understanding of what we are seeing.

Area 51 was fake till it wasn't. Plus there are other Areas too.
 
Well it's going to take a lot more than blurry videos for me to jump on board.

Let's not forget, even at the speed of light (that's 186,000 miles a SECOND, folks) just reaching our closest neighboring star - Proxima Centauri - takes four years one-way. These "aliens" would have to be very advanced indeed, because they would have to have mastered folding space-time and discovered how to safely navigate through purely theoretical wormholes.

This just doesn't seem like a logical conclusion, from a scientific standpoint. It's much more likely to be an equipment glitch or a weather phenomenon that we don't yet understand.

 
Well it's going to take a lot more than blurry videos for me to jump on board.

Let's not forget, even at the speed of light (that's 186,000 miles a SECOND, folks) just reaching our closest neighboring star - Proxima Centauri - takes four years one-way. These "aliens" would have to be very advanced indeed, because they would have to have mastered folding space-time and discovered how to safely navigate through purely theoretical wormholes.

This just doesn't seem like a logical conclusion, from a scientific standpoint. It's much more likely to be an equipment glitch or a weather phenomenon that we don't yet understand.

Who said they came here recently? There are many ways machines can virulently spread and multiply all over the galaxy. Especially if the process started say 200,000 years ago.

Also, who said that all of those UFOs are of alien origin? When humans are allowed to do proper science, without artificial obstacles, some of them show signs of impressive intelligence and progress.
 
Who said they came here recently? There are many ways machines can virulently spread and multiply all over the galaxy. Especially if the process started say 200,000 years ago.

Also, who said that all of those UFOs are of alien origin? When humans are allowed to do proper science, without artificial obstacles, some of them show signs of impressive intelligence and progress.
"Who said they came here recently?"

Very first paragraph: "In addition to the 144 UAP reports covered in the ODNI's preliminary assessment from June 2021, there have been an additional 247 new reports and another 119 that were either since discovered or reported outside the preliminary collection period."

"There are many ways machines can virulently spread and multiply all over the galaxy."

That's an opinion, not a proven fact.

"Also, who said that all of those UFOs are of alien origin?"

I don't know, but it wasn't me. My post addresses the odds of ANY of the sightings actually originating from another species in our galaxy.
 
Military using iPhones now? OKOK, platform agnostic: Samsungs too, maybe Pixels for low light. What kinda Instagram filter you need to get that grainy footage?

Weird that UFOs only show up in military footage when military cameras are outnumbered by several orders of magnitude by everyone else with a smartphone.🤔

Maybe the aliens are all vampires so they don't show up on all these back-illuminated CMOS sensors! Mystery solved.
It doesn't take much to find cell phone ufo footage
Or how about this supposedly from a drone
Given that there are a substantial number of UFO videos on You Tube alone, I don't think an argument that very nearly amounts to "everyone should have taken a UFO video" is really a sound argument for the absence of proof that UFOs exist. This is not a clinical trial under exceptionally controlled conditions where the absence of any demonstrable adverse side effects leads to the reasonable conclusion that such side effects do not exist. Even in that case, there could be the outlier in the general population that has a side effect that was not seen in the clinical trial - as that saying goes, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Besides, it is the existence of high-quality footage from military sources and evidence gathered by high-quality sensors of other types, I.e., radar, etc., that has lead some of the smartest people on Earth to conclude that the phenomenon is worthy of a deeper investigation. Even NASA is conducting their own investigation https://www.space.com/nasa-names-ufo-study-group-members

But feel free to hold the position that UAP/UFOs don't exist.

In the early 80's the PBS series Nova did an excellent show on UFOs and basically concluded that we here on Earth likely do not have the scientific capabilities to prove the existence of UFOs. Even in this time period, IMO, that is still a valid conclusion given that some of that "top-notch" military footage shows UAPs exhibiting maneuvers that defy the understanding of physics as we humans know it.

As I see it, it is a worthy investigation even though it is unlikely to offer concrete proof outside of a UAP pilot landing and saying "take me to your leader" which is literally the kind of evidence it would take. And you can bet that anyone advanced enough to have constructed craft that defy humanity's understanding of physics is not fool enough to do anything like that.
 
There are actually tons of UFO sightings. But you can't record that by phone if the object is at high altitude. Phones have zero optical zoom and digital zoom is just a crop function that reduces image resolution. Which means, useless.

Now, a 4K video camera with at least 50x optical zoom, plus a tripod, is a good start. You need a tripod to reduce enormous camera shake at 50x zoom.

This is why military equipment can easily outnumber cellphones, because I'm not aware of many people who carry an external 50x zoom lens with a tripod attached to their cellphone. On the other hand, military equipment can track objects, zoom them and keep them in focus even if they are 50 km away, while moving at high speed. No cellphone can do that.

French Air Force has released a document with thousands of UFO sightings long time ago. The witnesses were professional pilots, radar operators and ground staff. They excluded all explicable cases, but there were still thousands of those that couldn't be explained. For example, objects that move at speeds that far exceed anything military or experimental jets can do, doing maneuvers that no known manned or unmanned military object is capable of (including missiles). Russians have their own database of such events.
The UK is also is much more forthcoming with a set of data on UAP/UFOs that they have, too.
 
Well it's going to take a lot more than blurry videos for me to jump on board.

Let's not forget, even at the speed of light (that's 186,000 miles a SECOND, folks) just reaching our closest neighboring star - Proxima Centauri - takes four years one-way. These "aliens" would have to be very advanced indeed, because they would have to have mastered folding space-time and discovered how to safely navigate through purely theoretical wormholes.
Who's to say that humanity's understanding of physics is complete or absolute?

Even on Earth, there are credible theories on "warp drive" https://interestingengineering.com/science/warp-drive-not-science-fiction-faster-than-light-travel and the reference from that article - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6382/abdf6e
 
It doesn't take much to find cell phone ufo footage
Or how about this supposedly from a drone

Unidentified floating pixels, surrounded by inevitable video compression noise. If that's enough to convince someone that being visited by extraterrestrials is the best explanation then hey, that's a pretty harmless opinion.

But yeah: a balloon. or x-15 cruise basselope
 
With all the space junk we have around us, aliens just skip the trashy planet and go elsewhere for their vacations 😒.
Who wants to scratch their brand new UFO 😉
 
I believe its was the Space Shuttle Challenger or Discovery in 1989 that said, theres an Alien craft tracking us. The space shuttle was communicating with NASA at mission control. Right after that transmission, they went silent.
Being highly trained people, they dont just say Alien craft unless that is what they were seeing and likely knew about what they were seeing, hence why they called it a Alien craft.

As far as I know the transmission was real as was the event.
 
We have powerful military and civilian radar technologies that are able to see anything, from just above ground level to the stratosphere, from birds, rain, dust and smoke (even the lowly doppler radar can see that) to any object that has the tiniest radar profile.

And yet through the decades until now, neither man nor machine, was able to provide a hint of acceptable proof of a UFO that's of extra terrestrial origin.

PS: Yes, I do believe there is something out there. But please prove it first.
 
Back