G
Guest
I think Facebook just want to buy anything that seems interesting and might had prospect on it in the near future..
I had a feeling Oculus would sell out, and that's fine to a gaming company, but to Facebook? Hurts me right in the feels.
I think that at least 99% of all responses will be negative. And I don't see the point in even asking, since it is not going to change anything.
I do dream about 1TB Blu Ray discs. I know, its a weird thing. But it would just be so cool to me. Archival Disc is the answer to all my prayers if it ever reaches a consumer level price point.
I'm really interested at what you would do with multiple 1tb disks at a consumer level. What would you be archiving that takes up that much space?
HD: [C:] 86.27/249.90 GB [D:Media] 1643.12/1862.89 GB [E:SD Movies - Misc] 262.51/1862.89 GB [G:] 222.46/1613.01 GB [H:HDTV] 31.15/1397.25 GB [O:Seagate Backup Plus Drive] 335.23/3726.01 GB [Z:Torrents] 12.23/930.13 GBI'm really interested at what you would do with multiple 1tb disks at a consumer level. What would you be archiving that takes up that much space?
Not that this is anywhere near on topic but........, As you must surely realize, as data density would increase, ( given the same area for storage, 5 1/4" disc), the manufacturing tolerances allowed in the reading device, would become exponentially more minute. This is substantiated by the pathway width in Intel's latest processors. But instead of a static device, such as a CPU, here we would be dealing microscopic tolerances of moving parts, another ball game entirely....[ ]....I do dream about 1TB Blu Ray discs. I know, its a weird thing. But it would just be so cool to me. Archival Disc is the answer to all my prayers if it ever reaches a consumer level price point.
Even modern "erotic art" photography, has embraced, (pun intended), the vast amount of cheap storage space available to consumers. I have seen photo shoots with the "average" number of shots, (about 100 or so), coming in at over a gigabyte in size. If and when 4K comes into it's own, "mainstream" HDD capacity, will, of necessity, be well into the multi-terrabyte region.I'm really interested at what you would do with multiple 1tb disks at a consumer level. What would you be archiving that takes up that much space?
Not that this is anywhere near on topic but........, As you must surely realize, as data density would increase, ( given the same area for storage, 5 1/4" disc), the manufacturing tolerances allowed in the reading device, would become exponentially more minute. This is substantiated by the pathway width in Intel's latest processors. But instead of a static device, such as a CPU, here we would be dealing microscopic tolerances of moving parts, another ball game entirely.
As with anything mechanical, it doesn't take much read or write deviation to render a DVD or Blu-Ray disc unreadable. Picture how critical that situation would be, at many multiples of current storage density.
I think that at least 99% of all responses will be negative.
However a lot of people will still resent it just because they want an exclusive technology that doesn't sell much and not something that every Joe and Jane are using for their non-gaming purposes.
Probably representing 1% of gamers.
I think that in the long run Michael Abrash is right and Facebook's money will give Oculus the opportunity...
Interesting thought process there. Does that also mean that if more people started tattooing their faces that ink addicts would stop getting tattoos? Gamers don't play games because it makes them feel 'unique'. At least I never did. I played them for fun.
I'm fine with that. It is the thought that someone bought it, who hasn't really made a name for himself, other than the lucky dorm room break that made him famous. Don't get me wrong, I'm trying not to belittle him personally. I think it is great that he made his fortune at a young age. I can't stand what he has done with Facebook and fear the same for Oculus, regardless of whether it is strictly for games or not.In this case many comments do feel like it. Obviously some people resent the idea that the target market of Oculus will not be just gamers, even though logically that should not negatively affect its applicability to gaming.
I'm fine with that. It is the thought that someone bought it, who hasn't really made a name for himself, other than the lucky dorm room break that made him famous. Don't get me wrong, I'm trying not to belittle him personally. I think it is great that he made his fortune at a young age. I can't stand what he has done with Facebook and fear the same for Oculus, regardless of whether it is strictly for games or not.
Lets keep it small and say the forced Timeline was the final straw. I might would still have Facebook account and continuing to ***** about all the other things I hate, if Timeline hadn't of been a forced update. As it is I have been happy without Facebook and will never give Zuck anymore of my time, where Facebook is concerned. At least with Windows you can keep your settings set, and choose when you want to upgrade. There is a sense of stability with Windows, Facebook was always broken somewhere somehow. But please keep in mind I have no idea what Facebook has been like since the Timeline release, nor do I care to know.What are your specific reasons for hating on Facebook.
What are your specific reasons for hating on Facebook.