Windows 11 hits 72% share as Windows 10 fades, but not everyone is happy

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,917   +58
Staff
Connecting the dots: Windows 11 finally takes over the desktop, but maybe not on Microsoft's preferred terms. StatCounter's latest numbers show Microsoft's latest OS running on nearly three-quarters of Windows desktops worldwide, with Windows 11 at 72.78% and Windows 10 down to 26.27%. It is a sharp swing from only late 2025, when Windows 11 hovered above the 50% mark and Windows 10 still powered nearly half of all machines.

But this shift in Windows adoption looks less like a wave of enthusiastic upgrades and more like a forced march driven by expiring support deadlines, strict hardware policies, and a steady drumbeat of problematic patches.

At the same time, some Windows 10 holdouts aren't moving to Windows 11 at all. Instead, they're replacing their PCs and switching to macOS or Linux as Microsoft and Qualcomm promote a new generation of "Copilot+ PCs."

Driving this transition is a set of technical decisions that redefine what a Windows PC is allowed to be. Windows 11 formalizes a stack of security and platform requirements: TPM 2.0, Secure Boot, modern CPUs, UEFI firmware, and an always-online identity that tighten the link between hardware, the operating system, and Microsoft's cloud services.

Those same decisions are fueling a backlash from power users and enterprises who see their upgrade paths blocked, their recovery options weakened, and their control over the system eroded.

Unsurprisingly, technically adept users have explored and exploited every available workaround. Documented methods exist to bypass hardware checks through registry edits, custom installation media, or patched setup files, allowing Windows 11 to install on unsupported CPUs, systems without TPM 2.0, or machines that fall short on RAM or storage.

Similar techniques can still, in some cases, force the OS to accept a local account. But Microsoft is steadily closing these gaps, making it clear that systems running outside the official specifications may be denied updates or face reliability issues.

For those who do not want to play cat-and-mouse with each new build, the choice is stark: buy new, compliant hardware and accept the full security and identity stack, or stay on Windows 10 and face an end-of-support cliff.

The experience on supported hardware has also been uneven. Windows 11's security architecture leans heavily on features like BitLocker, Secure Boot and the Windows Recovery Environment, yet a series of buggy updates has undercut confidence in the stack. Recent patches have triggered unintended BitLocker recovery on some systems, forcing users to locate recovery keys they may not realize they needed.

These incidents matter because they strike at the safety net. Windows 11 asks users to trust a more tightly integrated hardware-firmware-OS stack, with encryption and secure boot paths that depend on everything working in lockstep. When an update misfires and leaves users stuck on a BitLocker screen or in a recovery environment that cannot accept input, it undermines the argument that stricter controls and mandatory security features are an unambiguous win.

So while Windows 11 has finally achieved numerical dominance, the path it took raises questions. Whether Microsoft can improve reliability and rebuild trust while maintaining its stricter model will determine whether Windows 11 is seen as a solid foundation for the next decade – or as the moment a critical segment of power users decided to walk away.

Permalink to story:

 
So at least 72% of PC's/laptops can (and do) run Win11?

It's a freaking LIE.
MOST people have older PC's or laptops that are NOT W11-supported.
Skilled users MAY be able to install that turd I mean OS anyway but such people are relatively rare in my experience.
My PC contains supported hardware but an install of 11 is never going to happen.
And I'm not the only one in this situation.
MS paid for this lie hoping it will convince people they need to get on that crppy bandwagon too.
Again: I don't want to, but most people just CAN'T.
And whose fault is that? Exactly!
MS should be cleaning up the mess they created instead of trying to get people to step into their TRAP. Because it's not impossible to make 11 suitable for hardware that's not supported but MS just does not want to do that.
 
Everyone complaining about 11 complained about 10 a decade ago but are now defending 10. Give it another 8 years and they'll be crying about 12 and defending 11.
Possibly. But for 30 years, I've avidly defended Microsoft, all the way back to the Win-OS/2 controversies and the furor over their "anti-competitively" bundling a TCP/IP stack with Windows. Win 11 is the first release that I've felt has taken a tremendous step backwards in usability, with their relentless push to not simply make new features available, but to force you into using them, even when they don't benefit you, or even cost you productivity.
 
Everyone complaining about 11 complained about 10 a decade ago but are now defending 10. Give it another 8 years and they'll be crying about 12 and defending 11.
I can only speak for myself but 10 eliminated the rare bluescreens that sometimes happened on my 7 install, and it ran/runs ever-so-slightly smoother. Killing 10's unwanted stuff is easy So zero complaints from me.
I really have no idea if I'm an outlier. Hell I'll give your post a like.
 
Win 11 is the first release that I've felt has taken a tremendous step backwards in usability, with their relentless push to not simply make new features available, but to force you into using them, even when they don't benefit you, or even cost you productivity.
As someone who’s been using Windows since 98, so not as long as you, however, are we all forgetting Windows 8?

If you’re looking at usability issues, Windows 8 was miles worse than Windows 11.
If it’s Stability, only Windows 10 really beats it.

Either way, it doesn’t matter what Microsoft do, it doesn’t matter how bad it gets, everyone will just use Windows anyway.

Nobody wants to learn Linux, nobody can be bothered with OpenOffice, and developers can’t be bothered with Linux while its market share in the desktop realm is so small.

I kinda hope Europe does push for tech on their side of the pond, competition is sorely needed.
 
I can only speak for myself but 10 eliminated the rare bluescreens that sometimes happened on my 7 install, and it ran/runs ever-so-slightly smoother. Killing 10's unwanted stuff is easy So zero complaints from me.
I really have no idea if I'm an outlier. Hell I'll give your post a like.
11's BS is just as easy to yeet and either techspot or TPU did a side by side test and found 11 performed better in games.

I think most of it is overblown. The AI stuff is nasty but so was 10's telemetry. Both can have those guts ripped out so as long as we can keep doing that /shrug. Its just funny that most of the same arguments were used when 10 came out, often by the same people. Everyone was gonna stick with 7 because 10 tracked everything you did, was a privacy nightmare, was bloated with useless stuff, and the new MS features were all bad and nobody liked them.

11 IS a bad OS, but so was 10, and I'll believe everyone is going to switch to Linux when Linux hits 10% desktop usage worldwide.
So at least 72% of PC's/laptops can (and do) run Win11?

It's a freaking LIE.
MOST people have older PC's or laptops that are NOT W11-supported.
Skilled users MAY be able to install that turd I mean OS anyway but such people are relatively rare in my experience.
My PC contains supported hardware but an install of 11 is never going to happen.
And I'm not the only one in this situation.
MS paid for this lie hoping it will convince people they need to get on that crppy bandwagon too.
Again: I don't want to, but most people just CAN'T.
And whose fault is that? Exactly!
MS should be cleaning up the mess they created instead of trying to get people to step into their TRAP. Because it's not impossible to make 11 suitable for hardware that's not supported but MS just does not want to do that.
Most people bought a PC within the last 8 years. They can all run 11. And it is trivial to get it running on older hardware, as MS has backed off from the mandatory hardware requirements. Most businesses have already made the jump, and end users have either upgraded or gone to phone/tablet use for everything.
 
Nobody wants to learn Linux…
Speak for yourself. The problem is entrenchment and people not being exposed. Linux has come a very long way. Since dropping Windows for Linux I’ve never been a happier user. I grew up on Windows, was perfectly happy for a long time, and they’ve lost me forever since 10. 11 is an absolute PoS. I’ve spent 100% of my PC OS fix time in 3+ years fixing dozens of other people’s Microsoft-introduced Windows issues rather than my own. That says everything you need to know about its stability and quality. More people should and are switching. Teach your kids Linux. Don’t let another generation of people get stuck in that trap man. Learning HOW computers work rather than being an MS stooge is worth the time and effort.
 
Their stupid updates broke my computer 3 times in less than 4 months.
I never had it happen so often with 10 or 7.
Idk what their hiring practices are,
but whoever hires these people
must go with those who made
those updates.
 
Speak for yourself. The problem is entrenchment and people not being exposed.
People have been exposed to computers for 40 years now and there are STILL hordes of them that refuse to learn how they function or even something as simple as how to copy/paste a file.

Most people have no interest in learning how to use a more powerful but slightly obtuse system. Which is good. We dont want the masses to switch to Linux and enshitify it like they have the rest of the consumer electronics industry.
 
Microsoft spent years trying to get people excited about Windows 11 with Copilot and rounded corners, and what finally pushed adoption over 70% was just... the clock running out. That's not a success story, that's a hostage situation with extra steps.
 
The Windows 10 holdouts switching to Linux or Mac instead of upgrading is going to be studied in business schools someday. Microsoft essentially said "your hardware isn't good enough for us anymore" to millions of perfectly functional machines, and a non-trivial number of people said "okay, neither are you" right back.
 
People have been exposed to computers for 40 years now and there are STILL hordes of them that refuse to learn how they function or even something as simple as how to copy/paste a file.

Most people have no interest in learning how to use a more powerful but slightly obtuse system. Which is good. We dont want the masses to switch to Linux and enshitify it like they have the rest of the consumer electronics industry.
We’ll have to agree to disagree on that point.

Exposure doesn’t equal obligation to care.

Most people use computers as tools, not hobbies—just like driving a car without knowing how the engine works. If a system requires extra effort to be usable, it’s reasonable that many won’t bother. That’s not stupidity; it’s prioritization. But keeping Linux “for the few” isn’t protecting it, quite the opposite. Broader adoption drives improvement, not decline.
 
I could quote other posters' stuff again but I'll cut to the chase instead as I'm under the impression my particular situation's quite a common one.

Skipping stuff until 11's release: for the first time the new version didn't just have issues just like pretty much every other release (except of course SACRED & PERFECT W2000! kidding) but additionally I strongly felt that Microsoft was trying to sc*** me. They INTENTIONALLY ruined things that worked well and flatly refused to fix them even though that would have been easy. And while by now which is a very long time later they reneged a little bit and adressed some of the complaints they just keep trying to sc*** the users. It's not the OS that's changed but Microsoft itself. As far as I'm concerned they can no longer be trusted. It's the old adage: hard to gain but easily lost.There's literally NOTHING they can do to all of a sudden regain my trust. That's not how trust works! Before adopting 11 I'd have to WANT to work with MS but I can't, because they are not a trusted partner.
So, while still on W10 what's really happening is that I'm leaving, it's just a bit slow because personal reasons.

I did a quite extensive test run with Mint (actually the third or fourth time over the years that I tried Linux) on my beloved laptop but that test failed. The reason is that I am currently a USER. I Do Not Want To Learn An OS Again. I'm old; it would be a waste of a large amount of my precious time. Windows is easy and intuitive to me, when I use Linux I have to browse the Web for ways to do even the smallest things and that happens ALL the time. <<<< I believe this is the not-likers' main issue
So, nope...Linux is not gonna happen.
It's going to be MacOS as soon as I can afford it because like Windows that OS is an intuitive thing to me so I'm no LEARNER, just a USER.
Sorry I got so long-winded there^^.
 
We’ll have to agree to disagree on that point.

Exposure doesn’t equal obligation to care.

Most people use computers as tools, not hobbies—just like driving a car without knowing how the engine works. If a system requires extra effort to be usable, it’s reasonable that many won’t bother. That’s not stupidity; it’s prioritization. But keeping Linux “for the few” isn’t protecting it, quite the opposite. Broader adoption drives improvement, not decline.

The problem it that what you say about driving is no more true then the pc. At least if you're going to drive a car, you (or someone you know) at least has to know quite a few things about the car other than "put gas in it and it goes". They too have some toys that do not operate by themselves. There are warnings that if you do not understand or heed them, it can cause significant problems. Don't perform the maintenance? Not only will you do a lot of damage to your car, you risk any warranty that you might have.

No, anything more than eating and breathing (and I'm not so sure about eating) will require the individual to at least put some interest into what they are doing, or run into issues.
 
Everyone complaining about 11 complained about 10 a decade ago but are now defending 10. Give it another 8 years and they'll be crying about 12 and defending 11.
That’s fundamentally untrue.

I was literally a local area promoter of Win 7 and was just fine with Win 10.

Win 11 is trash.

That’s not complaining - it’s fact backed up by multiple significant failures since the EOL of Win 10.
 
The problem it that what you say about driving is no more true then the pc. At least if you're going to drive a car, you (or someone you know) at least has to know quite a few things about the car other than "put gas in it and it goes". They too have some toys that do not operate by themselves. There are warnings that if you do not understand or heed them, it can cause significant problems. Don't perform the maintenance? Not only will you do a lot of damage to your car, you risk any warranty that you might have.

No, anything more than eating and breathing (and I'm not so sure about eating) will require the individual to at least put some interest into what they are doing, or run into issues.
Plenty of people don’t know anything about cars. They take it to a mechanic or worse yet run it until it breaks down because they ignored the red light on the dash.

One of my friends didn’t know what a crescent wrench was. Many college guys can’t change a tire. Most people couldn’t survive normal life in the 1950s let alone an true disaster scenario.
 
Back