Railman
Posts: 708 +100
Update: As far as I can see the File Manager is same as the Win 7 but with the horrid ribbon UI.
Glad to see I am not the only person who hates the ribbon.
Update: As far as I can see the File Manager is same as the Win 7 but with the horrid ribbon UI.
Glad to see I am not the only person who hates the ribbon.
I think the big clunky buttons stealing screen real estate must be aimed at touch users. Couldn't they just have the Ribbon UI toggle automatically, if you have clicked a mouse in the application show the normal menu bar. If a touch is detected in the application window show the Ribbon UI.Glad to see I am not the only person who hates the ribbon.
By Taskbar, I guess you meant « toolbar » ?Can't you minimize the ribbon?
Both Paint and WordPad have ribbon.It makes commands larger and easier to find.It will make many more features visibly discoverable.
I already have the ribbon minimized but it still annoys me because I would like the choice to have smaller icons. As a rule I do tend to use the task bar as you can populate it with commands that you want in the order you want.
I disagree. Ribbon is great for advanced users as well.I think the big clunky buttons stealing screen real estate must be aimed at touch users. Couldn't they just have the Ribbon UI toggle automatically, if you have clicked a mouse in the application show the normal menu bar. If a touch is detected in the application window show the Ribbon UI.Glad to see I am not the only person who hates the ribbon.
1) better support of configuration with system on a small SSD (120 GB) and all data on a big (1 Tera Bytes) partitioned turning disk : as SSD is expensive and has a limited number of allowed read/write offload from C: to the big disk all that is possible without too big performance penalties : e.g. user or program data, documents, videos, musics etc. even swap and hibernate files. Keep probably programs in C: so they can load rapidly.
2) re-think registry : it is not needed to have (and loaded at start) all the parameters of all programs (100 MB). The parameters of programs may be better in a second level registry in the program repertory. This may allow Windows to detect that the program has been UN-installed and that it may erase the few keys remaining in the central registry...
3) If you need to reinstall Windows after 2 or 3 years you need 2 days of work to apply all updates : Microsoft should publish periodically (3 to 6 months) a pack of grouped updates needing only 1 restart/pack.
I'll download and save theses packs for use in case or re-installation...
Most people just point out the Start menu issues with Windows 8 but there is actually a few other things that really make me rant as a computer tech.
1. The "PC settings" vs control panel. Half the features is in one and half is in the other.. why?! User management is hell cause you need to jump between the two.
2. The "manage wireless networks" feature from Windows 7 was removed. Now if a user logs into their router and change the pwd on it but leave the ssid alone Windows 8 cannot "forget" and reconnect to the network unless you enter a essay into the command prompt.
3. The backup features require a phd to setup, system restore is off by default, the removal of the F8 menu on startup that just dumps machines into loop boots forever and once again require a LOT of work to repair.
The backup features also refuse to use internal drives, people like me with a SSD and a huge mirror would really like to backup to the large mirror but are not allowed to do so.
4. Dual monitor support is CRAP. Cannot display the time and notification icons on any other display but the primary. Pinned items on second displays don't show proper context menus (like Skype)
Those are just the ones I run into on a near daily basis...
Also finally I totally agree that paying for a new version all the time is wrong, a $50 upgrade would be my high end.