Reports are coming in that barely any women have taken up the challenge, but it's become increasingly difficult to *deter-gents*.
Worst pun ever. I hope you're not taking credit for writing that...In fact, that smelled worse than a laundry basket full of my dirty socks. Now you've locked me in the horns of a dilemma, should I use my stash of Tide Pods to do the laundry, or sit home getting high on them while huffing socks?Reports are coming in that barely any women have taken up the challenge, but it's become increasingly difficult to *deter-gents*.
In the meantime, taxonomists are wondering why we don't toss humans into the genus "Pan", with the other two species of chimps..And then people wonder why cancer is on the rise. These morons could have just cut their life expectancy in half.
BTW, "herd" is the proper word for a group of cattle.
"Heard", is the past tense of the verb, "to hear".
Care for a Tide Pod, you?![]()
I was on my phone, give me a break. pimpin' aint easySo then, oh light of lights, would "infadels" be a metaphor for "infidels"?
I would have gone with "in-FUD-dels", you're awesomeness...After all, this is the internet.I was on my phone, give me a break. pimpin' aint easy
I don't deserve a loyal servant such as yourself. (I might also have been drunk)I would have gone with "in-FUD-dels", you're awesomeness...After all, this is the internet.
@Steve My monitor and keyboard will be forever grateful I didn't have a mouthful of hot coffee when I read this.Eat Tide Pods, cure skid marks.
Well, that's nice.As mentioned by others, Darwinism at its finest.
I get a chuckle out of the people here who continually claim that all corporations are evil without exception, and couldn't care less about anything other than money. These companies aren't comprised of a small group of elitist, childless, cranky (no offense, Captain) old rich guys , you know. They employ hundreds- even many thousands- of regular people who have their very own families, including stupid teenagers. Even the top execs.
To state that none of them care (other than from a financial perspective) if people get ill or die from their products is irrational and rather immature. Make sure you aren't on Darwin's list before making broad assumptions.
Perhaps you need to take this up with someone more in tune with your "reasoning".Disappointing response from a "senior" member of this community. You've basically endorsed the notion that all-or-nothing thinking is justified. Perhaps you need a break.
Okay... well you take care now. I hope you have family that keeps in touch. Be safe, friend.Perhaps you need to take this up with someone more in tune with your "reasoning".
I just deal in what I believe to be rather obvious facts about human behavior, how that interconnects with the animal behaviors which we all share, and leave popular opinion and political correctness out of the discussion.
How this leads to you suggesting "I need a break", is somewhat self serving. You don't have answers to counter some of my quite reasonable, founded in sociological and psychiatric research and observations, therefore, I should go away.
"An army creates the need for soldiers". Selling Chinese goods creates the need for an army of people to put it in boxes. There is a massive trade deficit between the US and China. Just because you don't care to face these facts. doesn't mean they don't exist.
Self preservation accompanies the animal side of our nature, while, greed, power, and status are the only foods that fuel the ego. Hell, one priest likely tries to "out pious the other", to satisfy his ego.
I saw a passage in a sociology textbook which suggested that, "when you encounter a "primitive culture", you can tell which are the most important members of the tribe by them wearing largest and most elaborate headgear! The same assessment works in "more advanced cultures" as well. After all, doesn't the pope have the most elaborate headgear in the Holy Roman Catholic Church. So, IMO, you can simplify understanding the motivations behind all human behavior, by painting with a very wide brush.
Basically what you're suggesting is, "I can't tell the forest for the trees". To which my counter observation would be, "if you're one of the trees, you can't tell your a**, from a hole in the ground". And again, this is something "rooted" in fact. <Pun intended.
Better still, how about if we stay on point, and you skip the faux patronization and feeble ad hominem platitudes.Okay... well you take care now. I hope you have family that keeps in touch. Be safe, friend.