"AI actress" Tilly Norwood slammed by SAG-AFTRA as soulless and unoriginal

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,511   +935
Staff
Sounding off: An actress-turned-producer has introduced an AI-based character she claims could be the future of television. But instead of sparking excitement, the project has drawn swift backlash from SAG-AFTRA, the powerful US actors' union, which didn't find the joke funny at all. As far as we can tell, absolutely no one is actually liking this kind of stuff, except perhaps for its potential in memes and adult content.

Eline Van der Velden, a Dutch comedian and actress based in London, is advocating for heavy use of AI-generated content to reshape the television industry. She is promoting her vision through "Tilly Norwood," a digital simulation of a "screen-ready" AI actress that, according to Van der Velden, could become the next Scarlett Johansson or Natalie Portman.

Early reactions to this AI experiment, however, may discourage any further attempt to build a successful business out of it.

Tilly Norwood was officially introduced at the Zurich Film Festival by Xicoia, the AI division of Van der Velden's production company, Particle6. The Dutch producer argued that audiences are more invested in a film's story than in its actors, and therefore, performers could easily be AI-generated.

A few months ago, Particle6 shared several video clips showcasing Norwood and other AI characters. The clips were allegedly conceived to ape real-world TV production, with the company aiming to redefine video, film, and television in one go. The AI-driven approach would slash production costs by 90 percent, while preserving "creativity or quality" at the same time.

SAG-AFTRA, the US actors' union, responded with strong criticism, stating that Tilly Norwood and the Xicoia project would undermine human creativity and are likely illegal. "SAG-AFTRA believes creativity is, and should remain, human-centered. The union is opposed to the replacement of human performers by synthetics," the organization said.

According to SAG-AFTRA, the uncanny likeness of Tilly Norwood was generated by an AI model trained on the work of countless professional performers, without permission nor compensation. The union described the hallucinated "actress" as soulless, devoid of emotion, and unwanted by audiences. Comments under Norwood's introduction video appear to support this sentiment.

In the end, Tilly Norwood and her AI-generated "shows" don't solve any real problem – instead, they create new ones by appropriating the performances of real actors. SAG-AFTRA also reminded producers that they cannot use "synthetic performers" without complying with the union's contractual obligations, as past cases have established.

Several actresses have voiced their disdain for Tilly Norwood online. Actress Mara Wilson argued that Particle6 could have simply hired one of the many real young women whose likenesses were used to create the AI persona. Facing mounting criticism, Van der Velden has attempted to reframe the project.

Norwood is no longer being described as the "next Scarlett Johansson or Natalie Portman," but rather as a "piece of art." According to Van der Velden, her goal was to spark conversation and demonstrate the power of creativity in the hands of just a few AI prompts.

Permalink to story:

 
It was quite funny and good.

Perhaps someday, the twist will be that we ourselves were AI generated. I wouldn't be surprised.
 
SAG-AFTRA, the same SAG-AFTRA that strangles new actors, made an absolute fool of themselves over Genshin Impact, and put in AI allowances int heir contract to make more money at the expense of due paying members?

If they hate it, it must be pretty good. SAG hasn't figured out that in the world of the internet and AI, they are totally obsolete.
I thought it pretty much spoke the truth..
It did, that is why SAG is so pissed. Unions HATE it when you point out their flaws. They know that AI is coming for them and are desperate to remain relevant as younger workers refuse to sign up with them.
 
The irony is that the actress behind this is arguing audiences care more about stories than actors while literally trying to sell the story of her fake actor. If anything this just proves people actually do care who is on screen.
 
I think the biggest irony here is that almost all gen Z actors are soulless and unoriginal. I don't really see much difference from AI actors.
Besides the constant short cuts lol. Any Gen Z-er would have a much better attention span than that, and that's saying something lol.
 
I won't watch anything with this thing, but I would love to have this level of NPCs in games.
For a long time I dreamed of large worlds populated with smart NPCs that have at least a basic intellect to interact with other NPCs, sleep, eat etc.
 
The LAST sit-in-a-theatre movie I've watched, was "Top Gun: Maverick" in 2022.
Even though it was "sort of" a reboot, it wasn't like most reboots. Everything now
is part 4,5,6 and everything is politically correct/woke.
Heck, I gave up on the James Bond movies after the first Daniel Craig version. Nothing
against Craig, but the Bond movies aren't BOND MOVIES...no "Bond girls" like in the old
days, no "funny" humor/jokes, like the old days.
Movies, for me anyway, are just not entertaining, without pushing an agenda, so I just
ignore them.
 
I have not seen this projection but I can say that most actresses are "soulless and unoriginal". The "soulless" is on them and the "unoriginal" is on the producers and writers. I would prefer projections. Some of my favorite characters are cartoon. Popeye? Bullwinkle? and many more but none of that Hanna-Barbara trash although Yogi was OK. Bugs Bunny!!
 
The irony is that the actress behind this is arguing audiences care more about stories than actors while literally trying to sell the story of her fake actor. If anything this just proves people actually do care who is on screen.
Yes they do.
 
SAG AFTRA is the devil. They would make me want to see a movie less, and I'd watch something that wasn't SA just to support goodness in the world.
 
Considering SAG-AFTRA is a U.S. Union, good luck when studios and others start going to other Countries to have their work done. Making Movies in Asia and Europe is cheaper than the U.S.
 
Just like legacy News complaining about digital, Legacy Taxis complaining about Uber/Lift, and legacy auto complaining about EV's, Hollywood is terrified they won't be able to fend-off Ai generated content.

"No! STOP ! That's a FAKE actress, you don't realise she's not REAL, you should have a parasocial relationship with OUR actors who actually love you, and totally think of every single one of you when you make comments on social media!"
 
Considering SAG-AFTRA is a U.S. Union, good luck when studios and others start going to other Countries to have their work done. Making Movies in Asia and Europe is cheaper than the U.S.
Ah but that's where Trumps tariffs come in
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g78e809zqo

Why compete on quality when you can just make the alternative more expensive. I guess the US can continue living in its bubble.
I often enjoy non-Hollywood productions a lot more. They refined their formula too much, making things predictable.

The random success of for example South Korean and UK productions are usually a lot more memorable and entertaining. Do wish the UK experimented a bit more and didn't produce quite as many crime dramas
 
Last edited:
IF you really think that you are already F#$ed in the head.
It was meant partly in humour, partly as extreme speculative sci-fi, and partly serious. Indeed, Isaac Asimov's "The Last Question" had a concept not too far off from what I was saying, and I doubt Asimov was ****ed in the head. It would make a fantastic story, if nothing more. We don't know what the nature of reality is, and its ontology is up for debate, particularly regarding time. One could easily imagine the perceived temporal flow springing from a universal "generative model," and perhaps other elements, such as ourselves, operating within that as a subset. Ideas, even crazy ones at times, are needed to advance our understanding of reality.

I often enjoy non-Hollywood productive a lot more. They refunded their formula too much, making things predictable.

The random success of for example South Korean and UK productions are usually a lot more memorable and entertaining. Do wish the UK experimented a bit more and didn't produce quite as many crime dramas
International cinema still has excellent work going on, though the 2020s have seen a decline. You often go away feeling you understand the human condition better. Even pure entertainment is well made.
 
I'm okay with this A lot of actors just because they keep opening your mouth and speaking I refuse to go watch their movies at this point because I know if I watch it they're going to get a little of my money and I don't wish to continue to pay for them to have a platform so if we can just replace them all with AI that doesn't have a platform that doesn't exist I'm okay with this make actors get real jobs again
 
Looks really quite good. Bridging the gap between AI and Reality is within grasp. Definitely need to keep an eye on it and prepare for the future.
 
Back