AI hardware demand could push consumer tech prices up 20% in 2026

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,902   +58
Staff
Recap: The surge in artificial intelligence development is straining global chip supply chains and setting the stage for a wave of consumer price increases spanning smartphones, laptops, and household electronics in 2026. Analysts and industry executives warn that growing demand for high-bandwidth memory chips is disrupting production cycles and leaving manufacturers scrambling for components traditionally reserved for personal devices.

The supply imbalance is due to the escalating build-out of AI data centers and the mass production needs of consumer electronics. As cloud computing giants such as Amazon and Google lock in long-term contracts with chipmakers to guarantee supply for their AI servers, makers of personal computers and smartphones are finding themselves priced out. Greg Roh, an analyst at Hyundai Motor Securities, told The Financial Times that consumer brands effectively had no choice but to accept higher prices because large cloud providers were securing the available memory through multi-year purchase agreements.

That dynamic has sent the cost of DRAM climbing sharply. These chips have become scarcer as suppliers focus on the more lucrative HBM modules. Analysts at TrendForce expect average DRAM prices, including HBM variants, to rise between 50 and 55 percent in the final quarter of 2025 compared with the previous three months.

Samsung, which along with SK Hynix controls more than 70 percent of the market, recently raised some memory prices by as much as 60 percent.

The shockwaves are already reaching hardware makers. In a recent earnings call, Dell's chief operating officer Jeff Clarke said the company had never seen costs move at the rate they were rising now, warning that the impact would eventually reach buyers.

British computer maker Raspberry Pi described its own decision to increase prices in December as "painful." Lenovo, the world's biggest PC producer, has begun stockpiling chips and vital components to buffer against continued volatility, according to its chief financial officer Winston Cheng.

Analysts say the situation could worsen before it improves. "We are already seeing a supply shortage across the board," said Daniel Kim of Macquarie. "The market is crazy with buyers in panic as they struggle to secure enough memory no matter how much they are willing to pay."

Kim estimated price hikes in consumer electronics could reach between 10 and 20 percent in 2026, while CW Chung of Nomura anticipated smaller increases of around five percent if some companies find savings elsewhere.

Chinese phone manufacturer Xiaomi is among those expecting heightened strain. Its president, Lu Weibing, cautioned in November that supply chain pressures in 2026 would be far greater than those seen the previous year, reflecting a broad expectation that bottlenecks will persist. Macquarie's Kim said a worst-case outcome would resemble the "serious supply chain disruptions seen during the pandemic."

Manufacturers are investing heavily to respond, but relief appears years away. Samsung said in November it would expand production by adding another line at one of its South Korean plants, while SK Hynix is building a $91 billion chipmaking cluster announced in 2024.

"We are thinking hard about how to address all demand," said SK chair Chey Tae-won at a company event. Yet ramping up fabrication takes time. "We are trying to increase supply, but it takes at least two to three years to build a chipmaking plant," an industry executive in Seoul said.

The demand surge has also prompted warnings from market analysts that inventory stockpiling could intensify throughout the year. Peter Lee of Citigroup said that "AI data-centre inference demand is far greater than anticipated, depleting chip inventories for PCs and smartphones as well." He added that supply would likely "remain tight until 2027, with no additional capacity expected," predicting that "chip stockpiling will be worse in 2026."

Morgan Stanley projects that US technology and cloud companies will spend $620 billion on AI infrastructure this year, up from $470 billion in 2025, contributing to what it describes as a $2.9 trillion global investment wave in AI-related data centers and hardware by 2028.

For consumer tech makers caught between surging memory costs and unrelenting competition, that spending boom comes at a steep price. As Citi's Lee put it, manufacturers now face a difficult choice: "either raise product prices or sacrifice margins."

Permalink to story:

 
20%? Make It 200%. We all know that electronics would be worth probably half of that If It wasn't for bitcoin and AI bubbles. "Maximizing shareholder value".
First example out of My head - I bought two years ago Chinese made Lexar NM790 for half of than price of WD SN850X or Kingston Fury/KC3000. And the same could be said about everything that is "manufactured by Western company.
 
20%? Make It 200%. We all know that electronics would be worth probably half of that If It wasn't for bitcoin and AI bubbles. "Maximizing shareholder value".
First example out of My head - I bought two years ago Chinese made Lexar NM790 for half of than price of WD SN850X or Kingston Fury/KC3000. And the same could be said about everything that is "manufactured by Western company.

The NM790 is cheaper because it’s DRAM less, tuned differently, and backed by a different support and validation. That doesn’t make WD or Kingston “overpriced,” it means they’re selling a better product.

You’re confusing cheaper manufacturing with equal manufacturing.
Western drives cost more because of tighter QA, better binning, more validation, and longer firmware and warranty support.
 
The NM790 is cheaper because it’s DRAM less, tuned differently, and backed by a different support and validation. That doesn’t make WD or Kingston “overpriced,” it means they’re selling a better product.

You’re confusing cheaper manufacturing with equal manufacturing.
Western drives cost more because of tighter QA, better binning, more validation, and longer firmware and warranty support.
My point was NM790 sells for the same price today as Western competition, 150% of 2024 prices. 10 years ago, after two years It would be obsolete tech with something new on offer. Greed on top creates constant state of keeping market supply low.
 
Last edited:
These, so-called shortages don't affect the vast majority of the end users. Let's, be honest, these tech magazines make money selling you, on purchasing tech stuff! No, one works for free. Having said that, there is a small percentage of computer users, gamers, heavy graphic designers, video editors, etc... that do need a powerful computer. But 90% of the computer market do NOT!! Case is point, this beauty right here.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0932CKPPY?tag=bestchoiceus-20&linkCode=ogi&th=1

The, above Beelink computer, (Beelink does NOT add any bloatware) is twice the computer most end users will ever need...
 
Last edited:
My point was NM790 sells for the same price today as Western competition, 150% of 2024 prices. 10 years later It would be obsolete tech with something new on offer. Greed on top creates constant state of keeping market supply low.
You’re still attributing everything to “greed” while ignoring how memory markets actually work. NAND pricing is cyclical, fabs cut production when prices collapse, then prices rebound when demand recovers. That isn’t artificial scarcity, it’s basic supply management.

The NM790 rising in price just shows it’s subject to the same NAND and controller costs as everyone else. If it were pure greed, Chinese brands would still be undercutting hard...they aren’t, because their costs went up too.

I get the frustration with pricing. But remember, companies exist to maximize returns on their investments...that doesn’t change just because they sell to consumers. Most people would do the same in their position.

Just look at eBay....nobody paid those prices for their RAM kits originally, but when the market supports it, sellers charge what people are willing to pay. That isn’t unique to corporations...it’s simply how supply and demand works.
 
This is Samsung we're talking about here. They are famous for supply chain maniplulation and price fixing, so now that they have a plausable excuse, you can expect them to squeeze every predatory penny out of their customers. Full on exploitation in the name of corporate victimhood.
 
These, so-called shortages don't affect the vast majority of the end users. Let's, be honest, these tech magazines make money selling you, on purchasing tech stuff! No, one works for free. Having said that, there is a small percentage of computer users, gamers, heavy graphic designers, video editors, etc... that do need a powerful computer. But 90% of the computer market do NOT!! Case is point, this beauty right here.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0932CKPPY?tag=bestchoiceus-20&linkCode=ogi&th=1

The, above Beelink computer, is twice the computer most end users will ever need...
You’re mixing up “what most people can get by with” and “what shortages affect.”

I understand where you are going with your post, however, shortages don’t have to impact 90% of users directly to be real or meaningful. Supply constraints hit manufacturers, OEMs, pricing, availability, and upgrade paths across the entire market, even if the average user never buys a high end GPU.

Yes, most people can get by with a low power mini PC or an office box. That’s been true for ever. That doesn’t magically mean shortages aren’t real or that they don’t distort pricing, delay products, or force companies to ship worse configurations at higher prices.

Also, using a Beelink as a “gotcha” proves the opposite point, it exists because mainstream PCs have become more expensive and harder to justify, not because performance suddenly stopped mattering.

Tech media doesn’t invent shortages...fabs, wafers, substrates, memory, and logistics are measurable bottlenecks. You can argue how much they matter, but pretending they don’t exist because “most users only browse the web” is just ignoring how supply chains actually work.
 
This is Samsung we're talking about here. They are famous for supply chain maniplulation and price fixing, so now that they have a plausable excuse, you can expect them to squeeze every predatory penny out of their customers. Full on exploitation in the name of corporate victimhood.
Samsung has a history for sure, but blaming every price change on Samsung alone ignores the bigger picture. Supply chain issues, component shortages, and inflation affect the entire industry...it’s not just Samsung.
 
How will the new fabs in Germany ease this?

they found more rare earths in both Sweden & Norway, maybe put some fabs there too.

EU has declared 20% of all chips gonna be from within EU soon, for themselves ofc.
 
These, so-called shortages don't affect the vast majority of the end users. Let's, be honest, these tech magazines make money selling you, on purchasing tech stuff! No, one works for free. Having said that, there is a small percentage of computer users, gamers, heavy graphic designers, video editors, etc... that do need a powerful computer. But 90% of the computer market do NOT!! Case is point, this beauty right here.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0932CKPPY?tag=bestchoiceus-20&linkCode=ogi&th=1

The, above Beelink computer, is twice the computer most end users will ever need...
For that Beelink, that may be well & good for today. But I expect to see more of these boxes selling with No RAM and No SSDs.
So $150 for the box, @$400 for the 32GB RAM, probably $200 for 1TB SSD = $750 for an entry-level mini PC
Kind of like houses only they took @ 10 years to double in price (and not triple or quaduple. yet.)....
 
Hardware price hike aside, AI is also causing all sorts of price increases since its been driving cost of power and water upwards. Also, data centers are using up farm space, which will ultimately cause food shortages. So honestly, what is there to like about AI? To me, it's mostly a harmful technology that makes people lazy, causes all sorts of shortages and just benefiting the rich (tech company CEOs and major shareholders).
 
Back