I don't know whats more disappointing, having to dodge all the ad's and zoom out to properly view this article, or the fact that CrossfireX R9 290's aren't included. No, SLi 780Ti's and CrossfireX 7970's aren't enough.
as said by the character Titus Pullo....wet like October
the article appears odd to me, too. using ie11 desktop version, 1600x900 resolution, windows 8.1 pro x64, latest updates current as of april 8, 2014 (Philippines) using this link.An impressive amount of complaints for a three line post. What do you have to zoom out for?I don't know whats more disappointing, having to dodge all the ad's and zoom out to properly view this article, or the fact that CrossfireX R9 290's aren't included. No, SLi 780Ti's and CrossfireX 7970's aren't enough.
Also has your browser been hijacked as there seem to be the normal amount of ads for me and they are very easy to ignore.
500 freakin watts on the graphics card...!!! man...I've been a tech enthusiast for like 20 years, but now I feel we are entering the "unethical" phase of tech..., I mean, dude it's for entertainment, it's an insane amount of electricity just to have fun....well to each its own
What a monstrosity! Thanks for the review.
@editor, On the overclock performance page, the Tomb Raider chart should have GTX 780 SLI on the top spot, if the numbers are as shown.
#commentsOffset
500w gaming rigs are nothing new, they have been around for the better part of a decade. However 500w graphics cards are a new thing.
I remember back in 2007 running a pair of HIS Radeon HD 2900 XT 1GB GDDR4 cards in Corssfire and that system consumed over 600 watts!!! So in terms of performance vs. watt things have in fact gotten a lot better as you would expect
yeah it's true, I used to find 250-300 watts on a graphic card truly overkill from an ecological point of view, but now we just crossed 500....my god
sad part is...and I dont mean sarcasm by this, I am barely impressed with graphics anymore, Frostbite 3 and stuff...same super polygonal **** as always, more AA, more defined, yeah yeah....everything feels like an evolution of the same, I haven't been woved by graphics in years actually
I feel we are not getting any closer to photorealism, an old VHS movie still looks more realistic than this 4k, 32xAA bullshit....I dont know man, dissapointed with what graphics engines are pulling out
Yea its weird, not a big deal but a small annoyance.the article appears odd to me, too. using ie11 desktop version, 1600x900 resolution, windows 8.1 pro x64, latest updates current as of april 8, 2014 (Philippines) using this link.
a small ads section appears below the article summary (iPad link in my case) plus an almost half-screen 'empty blank space' in which I have to scroll down.
the oddity is not found when browsing the article by page.
And their all legit.An impressive amount of complaints for a three line post. .
The charts/graphs.What do you have to zoom out for?
Yea its weird, not a big deal but a small annoyance.
And their all legit.
1) NO R9' 290's when in benching a R9 295? Cmon now.
2) There are blank spots with erroneous add positioning, even with different browsers.
3) The graphs are massive and don't fit or look as good as they did before, although I am using two 19" 1280 X 1024's with one 1680 X 1050 in portrait centered between the 19's, maybe these old mons don't have the rez anymore? haha.
The charts/graphs.
Not sure what to tell you then as the Battlefield 4 visuals blew my socks off, still trying to find them in fact.
Each year there are at least half a dozen games that truly amaze me. Can't wait for those games later this year
Problem I think you are finding is most games do look dated because they are made primarily for consoles and not PC's. Sadly even the latest Xbox OneMHz and PS486 are woefully under-powered compared to a mid-range gaming PC. Still it is those select few AAA PC titles that I hang out for each year
Which is major disappointment that in a way. hurts this article. Not having R9 290/290X's in CrossfireX to compare to a 295 is shockingly ridiculous considering you included everything else but the 2 MAJOR setups people will compare this with.So your only real complaint that concerns the article itself (not the web design which is still being tweaked) is that the Radeon R9 290’s aren’t included in Crossfire..
These graphs have a lot of blank space and take up too much room for what they are showing IMO. It's ok I don't mind zooming, others may not be so happy.Ohh that and the graphs being too tall for your monitor, you realize adding more GPU configurations will make the graphs even taller
That's fantastic but even with the same driver and tech dual GPU cards have had different performance in the past then their comparative CrossfireX/SLi counterparts, sometimes they are slower/choppier/faster, etc etc.Forgive me but I don’t see the lack of R9 290 Crossfire cards being quite the issue you do. It’s the exact same GPU architecture, the exact same driver and the exact same Crossfire technology. At around $1000 for the combo the R9 290’s are better value but that’s not a shocker, the R9 290 is better value than the R9 290X.
The price of dual GPU's have always been ridiculous, now they're sublime. Personally I could never justify that kind of outlay just to play games.Excellent review Steve, im actually shocked at how well this card does especially in the termperature category. Probably the best performing (At least on the stock setup) Dual GPU card I have ever seen especially with temps not exceeding 62C.
Tomb Raider was an odd one of the bunch, by any chance ( I know your review said Very High and 2xMSAA) was TressFX on during the review at all?
AMD was very smart and worked very hard on this card and it shows. Being able to keep 2 HawaiiXT GPU's on a single card while keeping them cooler at an overclocked state is no little feat. Im also glad you were able to actually overclock the card and show that off because its nice to see when a dual GPU card can overclock nicely.
My only complaint (Not article related) is that the card costs 1500. Sadly Dual GPU cards have gotten very pricey in recent years and this costs beyond 2 290X cards (Heck my trio cost me $1650 plus tax). Though I guess it could be justified in the sense of the fact its an overclocked card and has an AIO cooler attached. Though if I were going to buy this I would want a water block version for myself.
500w gaming rigs are nothing new, they have been around for the better part of a decade. However 500w graphics cards are a new thing.
I remember back in 2007 running a pair of HIS Radeon HD 2900 XT 1GB GDDR4 cards in Corssfire and that system consumed over 600 watts!!! So in terms of performance vs. watt things have in fact gotten a lot better as you would expect
yeah it's true, I used to find 250-300 watts on a graphic card truly overkill from an ecological point of view, but now we just crossed 500....my god
sad part is...and I dont mean sarcasm by this, I am barely impressed with graphics anymore, Frostbite 3 and stuff...same super polygonal **** as always, more AA, more defined, yeah yeah....everything feels like an evolution of the same, I haven't been woved by graphics in years actually
I feel we are not getting any closer to photorealism, an old VHS movie still looks more realistic than this 4k, 32xAA bullshit....I dont know man, dissapointed with what graphics engines are pulling out
On another note I am sure you have your reasons for using IE11 but it’s a pretty poor browser. Chrome or even Firefox are worlds better.
Normally ive seen dual GPU cards run more close to a 1:1 ratio with maybe a slight price bump or what not in comparison to the past.The price of dual GPU's have always been ridiculous, now they're sublime. Personally I could never justify that kind of outlay just to play games.