AMD's new Zen 6 chips will have a low-power core built from five different generations of Zen

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,053   +60
Staff
What we know so far: AMD is taking a different approach with its upcoming Zen 6 processors, introducing a new type of low-power core built from pieces of several earlier Zen designs rather than a single architecture. The change surfaced in a recent Linux kernel patch, which shows how the system identifies and manages these cores. The patch makes clear that the low-power cores are distinct enough to warrant their own classification, rather than being grouped with AMD's existing compact "C" cores.

Patch notes that the system needs a way to properly identify these low-power cores in user space, since they currently show up as "unknown" in the CPU topology.

It also specifies that on supported AMD and Hygon chips, these cores should scale performance using amd_get_highest_perf() instead of the fixed CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PERFORMANCE limit, aligning them with how existing efficiency cores are managed.

What stands out is how these cores are built. Analysis from leaker InstLatX64 points to a hybrid design that combines multiple generations of Zen. The reported setup includes a Zen 6 instruction set, Zen 5 microarchitecture, Zen 4 floating-point unit, Zen 3 L2 cache, and Zen 2 L3 cache.

Instead of designing a low-power core from scratch, AMD appears to be reusing and combining existing components. That mix-and-match approach suggests the company is trying to improve efficiency while keeping development time and complexity in check.

These low-power cores would sit alongside AMD's current Performance and Efficiency cores, creating a three-tier setup. Performance cores handle high-clock workloads, while Efficiency cores are smaller and tuned for lower power use. The new low-power cores go a step further, targeting very light workloads where minimizing power draw is the priority. In that sense, they're closer in purpose to Intel's low-power efficiency cores, though AMD's design is structured differently.

The potential benefit is clearer in mobile devices. Laptops and gaming handhelds could offload lighter tasks to these low-power cores, reducing overall power consumption. That could help extend battery life and let systems run certain processes at just a few watts. How much of a difference that makes will depend heavily on how well software can manage and assign workloads across the different core types.

There are still gaps in what's known. AMD hasn't shared performance or efficiency data for these cores, and it's not yet clear how well this blended architecture will scale under real workloads. The design is unconventional, and its success will likely hinge on how smoothly the hardware and software layers work together.

This development comes as AMD is rolling out its Zen 6 server chips, with desktop versions expected later this year. But the broader market may complicate things. PC shipments have been trending down, and higher memory prices, driven in part by AI demand, are pushing up system costs.

That matters more in laptops and handhelds, where upgrading the CPU usually means replacing the entire device. Even if AMD delivers better efficiency, adoption could be limited if buyers hold off on new hardware.

Still, the idea of building a core from a mix of proven parts marks a notable change in direction. Rather than stretching one architecture across every use case, AMD is carving out more specialized roles for different core types. If it works, it could give the company more flexibility in how it designs chips for power-sensitive devices.

Permalink to story:

 
Interesting developments.

Looking forward to seeing how the final product will do.

As an aside: for a while now I've been interested in building a desktop with laptop components as my secondary machines don't really need a lot of performance; only my game box uses a bit of that.
Still, laptop components that can be used in a desktop aren't easy to find.
I'm hoping this will change some time soon-ish.
 
I guess this is kinda cool. I dont see it as really applying to me and I would put money on the fact that I use my laptop away from a plug more than anyone else on the forum.

I have often wondered why we insist on making faster cores for everything. I will also kick the first person to bring up ARM in the nads so hard they'll fly out yoyr mouth at hypersonic speed. The 7735hs in my ThinkPad has never left me wanting in the field but its also overkill for looking at schematics and arguing with HR
 
I'll just note, in a thermally constrained setup (vendors insist on making notebooks thin rather than just a bit thicker for cooling), these will probably help your heavy workloads run at higher boost clock for longer since the light work will generate that bit less heat.
 
*deletes entire post*
Nevermind what I initially said. It sounds interesting although I don't quite understand what it entails. First I thought it was going to be multiple different cores (like Intel) on the same die.
But it's a whole puzzle of (presumably) the best parts of various architectures per core?
Think I'll just await more news.
 
Last edited:
Back