1. TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users. Ask a question and give support. Join the community here.
    TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users.
    Ask a question and give support.
    Join the community here, it only takes a minute.
    Dismiss Notice

Americans have too much faith in driver-assist systems

By Shawn Knight · 8 replies
Nov 16, 2018
Post New Reply
  1. A recent survey from the American Automobile Association, or AAA, found that 40 percent of Americans expect driver-assist systems like Tesla’s Autopilot, Volvo’s Pilot Assist and Nissan’s ProPilot to have the ability to drive a vehicle by itself.

    That belief was higher among Millennials (59 percent) and Generation X (40 percent) compared to Baby Boomers (27 percent), AAA found.

    In hopes of better understanding the capabilities of such systems, AAA tested four vehicles with driver-assist features – the 2018 Mercedes-Benz S-Class, 2018 Nissan Rogue, 2017 Tesla Model S and 2019 Volvo XC40.

    A variety of tests were conducted both on public roads and closed-courses. AAA notes that systems generally performed best on open freeways and those with stop and go traffic. Urban driving and freeways with moderate traffic presented more of a challenge for the systems.

    In closed-course testing, systems were able to maintain lane position with little to no difficulty when they didn’t have a lead vehicle ahead of them. Three out of four vehicles were influenced by a simulated / distracted lead vehicle, AAA found, and three out of four also required driver intervention to deal with a simulated stationary target.

    Greg Brannon, AAA’s director of Automotive Engineering and Industry Relations, said that with today’s exciting advances in vehicle technology, there is a greater need for naming that clearly signals to a driver what the system does.

    Permalink to story.

     
  2. Cycloid Torus

    Cycloid Torus Stone age computing. Posts: 3,614   +984

    So, why not focus on safety - like total coverage of 'blind spots' & rapidly closing t-bone threats?
     
  3. wiyosaya

    wiyosaya TS Evangelist Posts: 3,063   +1,539

    Stupid is as stupid does. Sounds like millennials and gen xers may have been spoon fed too much and have no clue as to how to feed themselves facts. The facts are out there, to paraphrase Mulder, if any of them take the time to look for those facts themselves.
    "Blind spots" are eliminated when the side-view mirrors are adjusted properly. https://www.caranddriver.com/features/how-to-adjust-your-mirrors-to-avoid-blind-spots The proper adjustment is similar to figures 1, 3, and 4 in the article. If you can see the driver in the car behind you in either of your side view mirrors, the side view mirrors are not adjusted properly.

    I take mine a bit further than the article so that I can see the vehicle in the lane next to me in my peripheral vision as it is leaving my side-view mirror. The range of view of the car in either lane adjacent to the one that I am in is such that as the car in the adjacent lane is leaving my rear view mirror, it is entering my side view mirror, and then leaves the side-view mirror as it enters my peripheral vision. It may take getting used to and may seem counter-intuitive, but there are no blind spots when the mirrors are adjusted this way. You have to use all your mirrors, though.
     
    Reehahs and ShagnWagn like this.
  4. psycros

    psycros TS Evangelist Posts: 2,312   +1,923

    Actually, you're likely to trade one blind spot for another using these techniques. Cyclists in particular become hard to spot when their almost - but not quite - right next to you. In the 90's there was a trend to attach smaller fisheye mirrors to the bottoms of the regular ones. This didn't last long, however, and I've always wondered why.
     
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2018
    wiyosaya, Reehahs and Theinsanegamer like this.
  5. cliffordcooley

    cliffordcooley TS Guardian Fighter Posts: 10,769   +4,584

    There are blind spots looking forward. Rear view mirrors do nothing for those.
    Now they magnify the whole passenger mirror, making the objects appear further away. Talk about a trade off. You now see the object but then you think you have more time to move.
     
    Reehahs likes this.
  6. Nobina

    Nobina TS Evangelist Posts: 1,663   +1,126

    You can blame people for sure but part of the problem is these companies selling you bullshit by hyping their driver assist like it's Jarvis from Iron Man. I feel like the more they dumb down their system the more people will pay less attention.
     
    xxLCxx likes this.
  7. Plutoisaplanet

    Plutoisaplanet TS Member Posts: 17   +23

    Isn’t the only relevant metric how many owners that believe their car is self-driving?
     
  8. Theinsanegamer

    Theinsanegamer TS Evangelist Posts: 1,367   +1,487

    Remind me who was demanding ever safer cars to protect their precious children?

    Right, boomers.

    Boomers are ALSO the largest group of automotive purchasers. AND boomers are the group most likely to have the money to spend on more expensive cars and their assisted driving cars. If there is a trend in newer cars, you look at the largest buying group, not the group both most likely to be unable to afford a new car as well and being the group most interested in not owning a car anyway.

    Mirrors do not give 100% rear coverage. "blind spots" refer to areas you cant see with your mirrors properly adjusted, you must physically turn around to see them, hence the name. Especially modern cars, with massive pillars. You cant see out the back of modern cars because the pillars are too damn think. In the 90s, we fixed this by having a smaller sub mirror to look further out while the main mirror was set to show everything beside you. Modern cars suck for visability, to say nothing of forward visibility with high beltlines and thick A pillars and B pillar placement making you feel like you are wearing goggles in a bathtub. Stepping out of my 2014 work focus into my 91 F250 is like stepping into a glass box, you can see EVERYTHING in the old truck.
     
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2018
    Reehahs likes this.
  9. wiyosaya

    wiyosaya TS Evangelist Posts: 3,063   +1,539

    That is very similar to what I was speaking of in terms of having a car right next to you. I'm not in an area where there are high density cyclists (though there are bicycle lanes almost everywhere), so I cannot say what the view of cyclists is like for me. As I said, though, I adjust my side-view mirrors so that the car next to me is in my peripheral vision as it leaves my side-view mirror. I think that's the best that can be accomplished.
    I agree - but it depends on the car you are driving as to the magnitude of those blind spots. In my present vehicle, a 2006 Prius, the forward blinds spots, so far, have not impacted my driving. Here is what one company is proposing to eliminate those blind spots. - https://www.oled-info.com/continent...iles-pillar-flexible-oleds-combat-blind-spots
    Maybe so - but that does not mean that those who have the disposable income to afford these vehicles are more attentive to the true capabilities of the systems in the vehicles.

    For me, I have more than enough income to be comfortable, and when my snow blower developed problems this week, I was all set to have the store I bought it from come to my door and pick it up to repair at an > $200 cost - until they told me that they were four-weeks behind on their repairs. After some suggestions, I replaced the spark plug and found that there was a bolt missing on the starter motor. Total cost for me to repair myself including a quart of synthetic oil (something of which I am more than capable to begin with) < $20.00.

    Not falling for marketing, at any income level, requires, IMO, a finely-tune :poop: detector. Those with significant amounts of disposable income are more likely to overspend without verifying marketing claims. I have a friend that deals in comic books and has significant amounts of disposable income because of that. One thing that I note is that this friend seems to think that if it costs the most, it has to be the best - which, IMO, is a complete fallacy.

    It is not necessarily in the age group - as my first post may have lead anyone to believe that I was saying - it is in the fallacy that what one thinks they are being sold on - marketed, especially if it is expensive, must be what is in the product, and believing that is fallacy.

    I have learned the hard way. I've fallen for my share of marketing over the years where I thought that product capabilities were greater than what they really were. I routinely find myself being more and more skeptical of marketing claims so much so that I will investigate as best I can before committing to a purchase.

    My 2006 Prius, to me anyway, sounds quite similar to the glass box you are speaking of. Adjusting mirrors properly is a step to minimizing the blind spots regardless of vehicle structure - at least as I see it. Being aware of those blind spots and what is required to minimize their impact, properly adjusted mirrors, looking around, etc., should be SOP for any driver.

    There is one other factor, too, that this article has left out that, from at least some news reports, seems to have a significant impact. That is distraction while driving. Combine the two, thinking the car is more capable than it is in terms of self-driving capabilities and distraction, and IMO, there's a recipe for disaster.
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2018

Similar Topics

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...