Apple couldn't build the best AI for Siri, so it's borrowing Google's

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,508   +934
Staff
In a nutshell: Apple is once again turning to Google, extending a long-running partnership rooted in search to underpin its most advanced consumer-facing AI efforts yet. In a joint statement, the companies confirmed a new multi-year agreement that will bring Google's Gemini into Apple's next-generation Foundation Model, a move that will ripple across Siri and other AI features within the Apple Intelligence platform.

As rivals across Big Tech continue pouring billions into the race for AI supremacy, Apple appears to be opting for a leaner, more pragmatic strategy, one shaped by its apparent inability to ship a homegrown generative AI system that can rival today's market leaders.

Under the deal, Gemini will enhance upcoming Apple Intelligence features and serve as the backbone for a more personalized version of Siri slated to arrive later this year. Reports suggest Apple began early discussions with Google back in 2025, exploring how a customized Gemini model could power its next-generation digital assistant.

"After careful evaluation, Google's AI technology provides the most capable foundation for Apple Foundation Models, and we are excited about the innovative new experiences it will unlock for Apple users," the Cupertino tech giant said.

Also see: Google's parent Alphabet surpasses Apple in market cap for the first time since 2019

Apple emphasized that Apple Intelligence will remain exclusive to its own devices and services. Integrated with the company's Private Cloud Computing architecture, the platform is expected to maintain the same privacy standards Apple already promotes across the rest of its ecosystem.

The partnership lands amid a complicated AI rollout. Apple first unveiled new AI-powered Siri capabilities in June 2025 alongside the debut of Apple Intelligence, but later pushed the assistant's launch to 2026.

Today's Siri relies on ChatGPT, and Apple says it does not plan to change its existing agreement with OpenAI – a curious position given its newly announced collaboration with Google. The joint statement's reference to a new generation of Foundation Models built on Gemini suggests both efforts may operate in parallel.

Pressure is mounting. Apple Intelligence, which blends on-device processing with server-side AI, has so far drawn mostly underwhelming reactions. Behind the scenes, however, Cupertino has continued advancing its AI initiatives with new data training methods, technology upgrades, and expanding internal testing.

Apple has long collected billions of dollars from Google to keep it the default search engine on iPhone and other Apple devices, a dynamic that now appears to be repeating itself in the age of AI chatbots and large language models (albeit the other way around).

The arrangement underscores an increasingly complex relationship in which Google is both a critical partner and a direct competitor. That tension is only intensifying as Alphabet rides a broader AI-fueled rally: the Google parent's shares surged 65% last year, pushing its market capitalization past $4 trillion this week, and making it only the fourth company ever to reach that milestone. In the process, Alphabet surpassed Apple in market cap for the first time in roughly seven years.

Permalink to story:

 
Better news would have been Apple abandoning AI entirely. Be different and all that... Shame.
Naw, not without a more focused leader. At least Jobs had his principles on how he wanted Apple to be seen (even if a lot of those principles were dumb).
 
The funniest part is that Google now gets paid by Apple to be default search and to power Siri, while also directly competing with the iPhone. This isn’t a rivalry, it’s a very expensive situationship.
 
So instead of wasting f-loads more power and resources making Yet Another Identical AI Model, they're using an already-existing one?

That... actually makes some sense.
 
AI, who gives a...
Apple was smart to not go all-in on AI, they might as well save the money and use something that barely works too

Keep AI away from my phone and PC, thank you - at least make me disable it completely to save ressources. Apple allows disabling it all.

Then why don't you get a Fold lol?

Probably because he was tired of fragmented Android mess, where apps are made for 100.000 different specs and is not optimized at all. Bugs all over. This is why iPhone wins easily in real world usage. Apps are tweaked to perfection and bugs are solved within hours/days mostly. Most bugs are discovered during development since model support is very limited / testing is easy beforehand. With Android, these bugs just go live and rarely gets fixed.

On my Android, company phone, bugs present 2 years ago still is present. Zero focus. Zero support. It works till it don't or don't work at all. Apps are crashing sometimes. Hence why second hand prices on Android phones are extremely low compared to an iPhone, with 6 years of average support and peak app optimization.

Used Android phone = Low/No demand. Low prices. Most don't even bother to sell them due to this fact. Dustcollectors.

Used iPhone = Massive demand in the used market. You can regain 30-40-50% of the price you paid after a few years.

The worst Android experience, is probably Samsung. Fold and flip are both total garbage. Tried both multiple times. Makes no sense. A brick in the pocket. A line on the screen, getting more and more visible over time.

A friend of mine bought a Fold for full MSRP, he sold it for 10% of what he paid 1½ years later. Tons of bugs. Apps crashing. Bluetooth issues/lost connection. Massive line in the middle of the screen where it bends. He went iPhone again and now he don't have a single issue.

This is what people pay extra for, the vastly higher resell value is just another big plus. When you consider TCO, an iPhone is not really more expensive than Android flagships, due to the low resell value on these.
 
Last edited:
Things I ALWAYS turn off/disable/kill : #1 Siri #2 anything AI

Make getting rid of these impossible and I'll ditch my device(s)

I actually keep a flipphone charged as backup device in case my iPhone breaks or turns unwanted
 
Because I refuse to pay ridiculous amounts of money for a simple phone, again. My last Fold died for no foreseeable reason on a very important international trip.

I’ll wait for the quality to increase and the prices to decrease.
Unless Chinese players other than OnePlus arrive here, prices will continue to only go in one direction ^^^.
 
Back