Apple settles pension lawsuit with English council for $490 million

[Bubbajim]

In brief: A class-action lawsuit against Apple has been slowly progressing over the last five years. The case alleged that Apple CEO Tim Cook misled investors with comments about iPhone sales in China, leading to significant investment losses. Apple has now agreed to settle the lawsuit with a $490 million payout.

The case was first brought in April 2019 by the US city of Roseville before being taken over in 2020 by a local council in the east of England.

Norfolk Council, on behalf of the Norfolk Pension Fund and other plaintiffs, alleged that comments made in November 2018 were materially misleading and led to significant losses from their pension fund. They alleged that Apple CEO Tim Cook defrauded investors by hiding information about low demand for iPhones in China.

According to the original filing, on November 1, 2018, Cook spoke to investors to set out their financial expectations. When asked if economic and political circumstances were having an impact on iPhone sales in China, Cook gave a misleading answer. He said the only "emerging markets that we are seeing pressure in are markets like Turkey, India, Brazil, Russia … where currencies have weakened", before adding, "I would not put China in that category."

The suit alleged that this statement, among others, was "materially false and misleading when made," as Cook knew that iPhone sales had been decreasing in China already.

On January 2, 2019, two months later, Apple released a revenue forecast showing they had missed their target by $9 billion due to slower sales, which rocked markets and sent Apple's share price tumbling by nine percent.

It emerged at the time that Apple had quietly instructed its manufacturers to reduce iPhone production by as much as 30 percent, and moved some marketing staff over to sales positions. Both of these are indicators that Apple knew its sales weren't as healthy as they had suggested.

The plaintiffs in the case say they relied on information by Cook that was ultimately fraudulent, and so sought damages from Apple.

Apple has been fighting this case for almost five years. The company initially tried to have the case dismissed, arguing that the plaintiffs hadn't adequately proven intent to defraud, but the courts disagreed.

A new date was set for later this year, but instead, Apple has agreed to settle. It will pay the plaintiffs $490 million (£385 million), though we have no breakdown of how much each party would receive under the agreement. This preliminary settlement will still need approval from a judge, which will likely come later this year.

To put the settlement figure in perspective, Apple made roughly $97 billion in net income last year, so $490 million equates to roughly 0.5 percent of that.

Permalink to story.

https://www.techspot.com/news/102291-apple-settles-pension-lawsuit-english-council-490-million.html

 

[themastergoose]

Pocket money to Apple, but what I always wonder is out of the payout how much the lawyers take.

I’d wager it’s the lions share of the proceeds leaving very little for the little guy at the end of it all.

 

[kiwigraeme]

Given Martha Steward did jail time for a minor inside trading.
This is in a higher league .As I continue to state CEO and directors of huge corps practically never see jail time

Yes it is 1000 times worse than Martha . Apple insiders can make big money knowing future isn't as rosy.

The thing is the big lie spouted by big business and media like Fox and then like easily fooled peopled

When the elites get richer and richer , with little penalties to their actions , when they pull the ladders out .
When the middleclass/working class is disappearing.
When democracy for the average person gets less .

Then society becomes for unstable , and can lead to violent unrest

The super wealthy complain about progressive tax , but it works , countries with just tax regimes are safer and more happy and stable

The EU holding the big Corps to account ison the whole a good thing
So easy for a big Corp to bribe corrupt govts go into a country rip out resources and leave broken bodies and devastation

Saw an article the other day - A USA company not liable for the conditions of resources it buys in The D. R of Congo .Child labour etc . Basically should be dealt with in that country and the local companies , yeah right

This is completely at odds with personal law . You as an individual can not freely buy illegal goods, stolen property etc. Some countries have enabled tourist sex laws . ie you will be punished on return from say SE Asia.

Also easy for companies to have cut outs,very hands off exploitation

tl/dr This is a good thing if you want stability the powerful people and corps must be held responsible and have reforms

The English empire , USA , Russia in 19th Century all held of rebellion by instigating reforms - eg workers rights/protections , democratic empowerment ( yes the Russian Tsarist did implement reforms 60-70 years before 1917 )

 

[Lounds]

Norfolk is the pensioner county of England.

 

[passingposeidon]

Norfolk is the pensioner county of England.

Hey, it's a lovely place. One of the driest parts of Englands (decent weather), out of the way, people are there because they want to be. Nice city (a "fine" city, you might say ...). Beaches, nice villages, rivers to sail down, nice university, good place to raise a family. Good on them for winning the case.