Apple's smart glasses are delayed as company wrestles with privacy concerns

midian182

Posts: 11,771   +179
Staff member
Through the looking glass: Apple is facing a dilemma: how can a company that has long prided itself on respecting users' privacy release a product notorious for spying on people – smart glasses? It's something that Cupertino is worried about, which is why its take on the device is reportedly being delayed until late 2027.

Reports that Apple is developing smart glasses go back years now. It was recently revealed that the product, codenamed N50, was set to be introduced this year ahead of its rollout in early 2027.

However, Apple sage mark Gurman writes that the company is postponing the release until late next year while it tries to address the issue of the inherent privacy violations associated with smart glasses.

Gurman says that Apple's solution is to work on several new hardware and software-related privacy features that aren't available on current products.

One of the software changes will almost certainly be something that Meta has recently introduced to its smart glasses. The company announced earlier this month that should anyone tamper with its glasses' LED light, so it doesn't activate when the user is recording video or taking photos, the onboard camera will be remotely disabled.

Something else that Meta has suggested it will do is release a pair of smart glasses with no onboard camera. Apple could do the same thing, and has also considered including the full camera system but not allowing it to record photos or video at all, according to Gurman, which sounds bizarre.

Some other privacy-focused features that Apple is looking at include processing the smart glasses' data on the device itself and not in the cloud. The company is also expected not to send any captured footage to moderators for human review, and it won't use images from the glasses for AI training. It's also unlikely that there'll be an always-on recording mode, which is something that Meta is reportedly working on.

There's been plenty of controversy surrounding smart glasses going all the way back to Google Glass. March brought news that data labelers were reviewing intimate recordings captured by Meta's glasses. There was also a story in May about a Meta contractor who fired 1,100 AI trainers after they revealed Ray-Ban glasses recorded private and intimate footage.

We've also seen a lot of anger from the public over smart glasses recording and photographing them without consent. New York recently became the first state to ban the devices in courtrooms. The move is to prevent people from covertly recording court proceedings – an activity that is in violation of both state law and local court regulations.

Permalink to story:

 
Have an onboard camera but have zero ability to store or record using it. That way people can use the camera to identify things, navigate blah blah but no privacy implications.

Apple could do this I would imagine? I wouldn't trust Meta or Google to not be 'accidentally' recording everything their camera see's even if they say they didn't because that's the gutter those two companies operate in.
 
Apple smart glasses will earn as much or more than Apple Watch.

They are taking their time to do them right, but time wasted is money lost.

I want them.

I want them specifically as a POV recording agent. I think that apple glasses, watch and AirPods will become a new type of ecosystem pushing humanity further towards cybernetics than ever.

Imagine being able to automatically call 911 on violent people and simultaneously giving them evidence.

Imagine knowing women’s body counts and health histories so you know who not to waste time talking to.

Imagine forcing people to be polite because now, everything they do and say is a matter of public record.

I can hardly wait!!!
 
Have an onboard camera but have zero ability to store or record using it. That way people can use the camera to identify things, navigate blah blah but no privacy implications.

Apple could do this I would imagine? I wouldn't trust Meta or Google to not be 'accidentally' recording everything their camera see's even if they say they didn't because that's the gutter those two companies operate in.
Have an onboard camera but have zero ability to store or record using it. That way people can use the camera to identify things, navigate blah blah but no privacy implications.

Apple could do this I would imagine? I wouldn't trust Meta or Google to not be 'accidentally' recording everything their camera see's even if they say they didn't because that's the gutter those two companies operate in.


If it can’t record, I refuse to buy it.

Version 2 will then have a camera
 
I don't know, I don't see a problem with allowing these devices to record in public without showing an LED when recording. Anyone already has the right to record or take photos of anyone or anything in public. Why is it a problem?

Yes, I think the recorded media should be kept on device and not snooped on by the company who makes it... just like everything else. The recorded media belongs to the owner of the devices not the company. But if someone wants to record and archive their life in secret, why shouldn't they be able to? They can review the footage at the end of the day to help recall things they might have forgotten, or use an on-device AI to assist with memory and recall.

This is no different from all the police wearing body cams, except the recorded media is owned and maintained by the owner of the device.
 
The only way they'll be allowed to construct such an extensive surveillance network is by looping the feds into their feed. Every other flagship tech company on the planet is working towards the same goal and making their own path to it.
 
I don't know, I don't see a problem with allowing these devices to record in public without showing an LED when recording. Anyone already has the right to record or take photos of anyone or anything in public. Why is it a problem?

Yes, I think the recorded media should be kept on device and not snooped on by the company who makes it... just like everything else. The recorded media belongs to the owner of the devices not the company. But if someone wants to record and archive their life in secret, why shouldn't they be able to? They can review the footage at the end of the day to help recall things they might have forgotten, or use an on-device AI to assist with memory and recall.

This is no different from all the police wearing body cams, except the recorded media is owned and maintained by the owner of the device.
You just know that the likes of Meta and Google will use it to track people, their behaviour and everything they say and do. Not just the people wearing the glasses but also anybody they happen to look at or interact with. These companies have shown time and again how untrustworthy and dishonest they are, there's no way they wont do the same again. I don't want to live in a world where Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Sundar Pichai and all the other techbro pondlife are profiteering and spying on me in order to attempt to monetize me in any way they can.
 
I feel like were going to learn a hard lesson here? People suck. These will be used for a desire to do harm more than a desire to do good.
 
Back