Are Quad-core CPUs Finally Dead in 2019?

I was expecting some older 4 cores. Still running my 2500k with a now upgraded rx580 and cpu cooler. Runs many new programs well at near 4k. Civ vi being still slow but farcry 5 is awesome.

Sure bring on ryzen 3000 and I'll upgrade but the old cpu is still going well. Certainly not dead.
 
I bet most programmers are finally getting to understand how to code for quads. Now they, as a majority, will be pushed to learn again.
I remember for how long I d stumble on apps that load only one core and wont use the rest 3.
So are we gonna see now four cores under load and 12 resting?
Looks like this is what we got for few years ahead.
Have you ever written a program in your life let alone a multi threaded one
 
Are 4 cores useless for gaming? How about this: Are 16 cores each running at 200MHz ideal for gaming? It's not the number of cores, it's the speed that counts for gaming. Clearly a quad core running at 5GHz will crush an 8 core running at 2.4GHz, when it comes to gaming. Simply because most games don't use all available cores and many are heavily single-threaded.
 
Frame rate is one side of the coin though. Some people (I read in some site forums and reddit especially) report that their 4 core superclocked intel CPU does not "feel" smooth in some demanding titles.
 
A quad core cpu analysis and not a single Intel model wich has higher IPC, clocks and ram speeds? Cmon techspot... Less biased please. You think a quad Amd chip can compete with even a 4670k at 4,5ghz? Lol

Im sorry but this article is useless
 
I bet most programmers are finally getting to understand how to code for quads. Now they, as a majority, will be pushed to learn again.
I remember for how long I d stumble on apps that load only one core and wont use the rest 3.
So are we gonna see now four cores under load and 12 resting?
Looks like this is what we got for few years ahead.
Have you ever written a program in your life let alone a multi threaded one
Yes, in my past life when I was a programmer from India. But if you look to critique my post, I am not talking about complicated things I have no clue about, just the things I came across and was able either to see myself or read from many others who discussed this on forums and tech websites.
 
An octa core CPU isn't necessarily faster than a quad core one. There's no reason for quad cores to die yet, most people use them.

Unless the said so user is doing more with their computer besides gaming and working.
If the software is heavy intensive on the cpu for doing work, programming, software-hardware development.
Then yes I could see the need for hexa-cores and octa-cores for real power uses.
Other than that, amd ryzen, intel coffelake chipset should plenty enough for people of today.
 
This article is very narrow minded and misleading.
BTW, does AMD still rely on pins? I will only consider AMD as an option when they start using contacts- It's the 21st century for heaven's sake!!!
 
This article is very narrow minded and misleading.
BTW, does AMD still rely on pins? I will only consider AMD as an option when they start using contacts- It's the 21st century for heaven's sake!!!
I'm pretty sure AMD chips install the same as Intel as I built one of each within the past year and don't recall any major differences apart from the cooler install.
 
Wow you're using AMD APUs to represent all quad core cpus? Theres a big difference between those and Intel's Skylake cpus. Your last paragraph literally implies that the 7700k is a weak entry level cpu and is not good enough for mid range gaming. Also you said 6 core 12 threads as the minimum for the next few years? Wtf the 8600k is good enough? I didnt expect such a BS article from you Steve
 
Last edited:
This article is very narrow minded and misleading.
BTW, does AMD still rely on pins? I will only consider AMD as an option when they start using contacts- It's the 21st century for heaven's sake!!!
I'm pretty sure AMD chips install the same as Intel as I built one of each within the past year and don't recall any major differences apart from the cooler install.
The issue is not the CPU install- it's the headache of having to fix bent pins every now and then- If you constantly switch boards and CPU's, you'd know what I'm talking about.
 
This article is very narrow minded and misleading.
BTW, does AMD still rely on pins? I will only consider AMD as an option when they start using contacts- It's the 21st century for heaven's sake!!!
Both manufacturers still use pins. However AMD place their pins on the CPU whereas Intel use LGA (Local grid array) which means the pins are on the motherboard, personally I think Intel’s solution is better as the pins are less likely to get bent on a motherboard and usually the motherboard is the cheaper component to replace if a pin does bend. The flip side is that because Intel release a new motherboard with every other generation you might have trouble sourcing older motherboards if you need a replacement due to a bent pin.
 
Are 4 cores useless for gaming? How about this: Are 16 cores each running at 200MHz ideal for gaming? It's not the number of cores, it's the speed that counts for gaming. Clearly a quad core running at 5GHz will crush an 8 core running at 2.4GHz, when it comes to gaming. Simply because most games don't use all available cores and many are heavily single-threaded.
Until games can be programmed to run more effectively on many cores at slower speeds, this issue will remain. However, as been previously pointed out, RPGs and MMO's need and utilize the higher cores. But even at 8 cores, you still need the 5GHz of speed!
 
Last edited:
This test is not scientific. If you really want test how many cores/threads a game use, you need to test using same high-end CPU and enabling/disabling cores/SMT/hyperthreading. For example, use Ryzen 2700X. 1st test is 8C/16T, 2nd test is 8C/8T, 3rd test is 7C/14T, 4th test is 7C/7T, etc. This to eliminate influence of higher cache memory size on more expensive CPU like Ryzen 2700X compared to Ryzen 2200G. In conclusion, shame on you for not being scientific and misinformed the society.
 
Back