1. TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users. Ask a question and give support. Join the community here.
    TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users.
    Ask a question and give support.
    Join the community here, it only takes a minute.
    Dismiss Notice

Asus gaming laptops with 300Hz displays set to arrive next month

By midian182 · 18 replies
Sep 4, 2019
Post New Reply
  1. At the Berlin-based tech conference, Asus revealed several 15- and 17-inch Strix and Zephyrus S laptops, sporting RTX 2070 and 2080 cards, which feature the 300Hz displays. The company also makes machines with 240Hz screens, including the Strix Scar III—one of the top gaming picks in our Best Laptops feature.

    Asus says the first of its laptops to come with a 300Hz screen option will be the previously released 17-inch ROG Zephyrus GX701, which has an RTX 2080 “clocked up to 1230MHz at 100W in Turbo mode” to power that high refresh-rate display. It arrives this October, with other Asus ROG 300Hz models launching next year.

    Asus says 300Hz screens can draw 5X more frames than the 60Hz displays found on most laptops and represents a 25 percent increase over the current standard for high-level esports tournaments. It added that this refresh rate could draw a complete new frame every 3.3ms, which is nearly as fast as the 3ms response time of the pixels.

    Asus isn’t the only company moving in this direction. Acer announced that its Predator Triton 500 gaming laptop would soon come with an optional 300Hz screen and Nvidia’s G-Sync for $2,799.

    Exactly how many people will feel the need to own an expensive laptop with a 300Hz display remains to be seen, especially as reaching such high frame rates will require reducing many games’ graphical settings. And will it really be worth paying extra for one of these machines over a laptop with a 240Hz display? Asus and Acer will no doubt hope plenty of competitive gamers say yes.

    Permalink to story.

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 4, 2019
  2. Vulcanproject

    Vulcanproject TS Evangelist Posts: 783   +1,143

    Unnecessary.
     
    Odium, loki1944 and psycros like this.
  3. psycros

    psycros TS Evangelist Posts: 2,825   +2,672

    Clearly meant for the folks who take adderall without a prescription.
     
    QuantumPhysics and loki1944 like this.
  4. Uncle Al

    Uncle Al TS Evangelist Posts: 5,710   +4,047

    Whewwwwww ..... that would break the retirement check, for sure!
     
  5. VitalyT

    VitalyT Russ-Puss Posts: 4,612   +3,222

    Is it intended to warp the screen and suck you in?

    It's a gaming BS disease, very contagious.
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2019
    Odium likes this.
  6. Ravalo

    Ravalo TS Member Posts: 89   +24

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV8P6T5tTYs

    Here
     
  7. VitalyT

    VitalyT Russ-Puss Posts: 4,612   +3,222

    That is a very useless video, comparing a 60Hz panel to a 240Hz, with everyone pointing at it in the comments, that people only care comparing a 120/144Hz panel to 240Hz one, while nobody cares about going from 60Hz to 240Hz, because the difference is just too obvious.
     
  8. toooooot

    toooooot TS Evangelist Posts: 955   +454

    Love it! But dont need it. Simply too expensive for what it can do.
     
  9. IAMTHESTIG

    IAMTHESTIG TS Evangelist Posts: 1,772   +838

    I wonder if one can even see a difference in motion from 240 vs. 300 Hz...

    So if you have a new frame every 3.3 ms. and the pixels can refresh in 3.0 ms. aren't you going to be waiting another 2.7 ms. for the pixels to refresh? I think you would end up essentially dropping frames because you are still waiting for pixel refresh.
     
  10. QuantumPhysics

    QuantumPhysics TS Evangelist Posts: 1,635   +1,232

    I'd rather a 51m with a 2080. Fortunately I'm not in the market for a laptop right now. By the time my laptop is ready to be replaced they'll probably have a 3000 series or 4000 series capable of 300Hz.
     
  11. Fearghast

    Fearghast TS Addict Posts: 155   +104

    Not really to see difference, but an average human can perceive 300+ Hz/fps.
    If pixels are not fast enough, you will not drop frames, you will "see" motion blur.
     
  12. lexster

    lexster TS Guru Posts: 624   +304

    I think I might have found my next lan party machine. Very nice. Though I think I'll lean toward the 240hz model.
    That is incorrect. The human eye can physically distinguish individual frames at up to 80hz. However we can tell the difference in smoothness of animation up to 260hz. Beyond that is the limit of human perception. So 240hz is brushing the line of human perception. 300hz exceeds it, but doesn't hurt anything.
     
  13. Fearghast

    Fearghast TS Addict Posts: 155   +104

    There are medical tests you know.
     
  14. lexster

    lexster TS Guru Posts: 624   +304

    What do you mean?
     
  15. Brahman05

    Brahman05 TS Member Posts: 24   +13

    'Asus says 300Hz screens can draw 5X more frames than the 60Hz displays found on most laptops'........Asus says this....... Because math........?
     
  16. lexster

    lexster TS Guru Posts: 624   +304

    60x5=300... So yes.
     
  17. Odium

    Odium TS Enthusiast Posts: 54   +23

    Except for your wallet
     
  18. lexster

    lexster TS Guru Posts: 624   +304

    That depends on your wallet. That price doesn't hurt mine.
     
  19. Brahman05

    Brahman05 TS Member Posts: 24   +13

    I'm still not sure....... I want hear what MSI has to say on the subject.......
    Missed the sarcasm there did ya
     

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...