Endymio
Posts: 5,136 +4,801
This is why Star Trek (barring a few initial episodes) isn't Science Fiction: it's space opera fantasy for mental juveniles. There can never be a "post scarcity" world in which individuals have any and all material desires fulfilled. In the US and Europe today, a middle-class family lives better than the royalty of a thousand years ago, and yet they still have vast unfilled material wants.Though debated, it is not clear what, exactly, is the economic system of Star Trek. It is a post-scarcity world:
Can the economy of Star Trek support every individual owning their own galaxy-traveling starship? What about housing? Who decides how large a residence you're allowed? What if you want a 50-room villa? A 500-room palace, with thousands of hectares of manicured gardens around it? Some items are inherently rare, or even singular: who decides who owns them, if not by some Gosplan-like commissar diktat?
Do you honestly believe this changes the argument? A system may not be fully socialistic -- but that doesn't mean one can't identical and criticize the socialist elements within in.At any rate, there are distinctions between socialism, communism, capitalism, and fascism, but people try to label an entire system as Socialist or Communist