California startup's new fire-suppression system uses sound instead of water

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,913   +58
Staff
Forward-looking: When wildfires sweep through the dry hills outside Los Angeles, homes can be lost in moments. A California startup imagines a different outcome: as embers fall and nearby brush ignites, flames reach a house and abruptly die out. There's no water, foam, or retardant involved – only inaudible waves of sound extinguishing the fire before it spreads.

Sonic Fire Tech, co-founded by aerospace engineer Geoff Bruder, has developed a system that uses infrasound – low-frequency sound waves below the threshold of human hearing – to suppress fire.

Bruder, who previously researched thermal energy conversion at NASA, says the key is shaking up the oxygen molecules that feed combustion. When vibrations disrupt how oxygen mixes with fuel, the chain reaction that sustains a flame collapses.

The principle behind acoustic fire suppression isn't new. From 2008 to 2011, the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency studied the possibility of using sound to manage flames, and university researchers later built experimental versions, including a device from George Mason University that operated much like a subwoofer.

What sets Sonic Fire Tech apart is its use of infrasound. Earlier designs operated at 30 to 60 hertz, producing audible tones that could interfere with nearby structures or people. Sonic's system works at 20 hertz and below – frequencies not only inaudible but capable of traveling greater distances without distortion.

According to Bruder, Sonic's system works through a piston-based generator powered by an electric motor. The piston emits pulsed sound waves through metal ducts mounted under a building's roof and eaves. Arrays of sensors detect heat or flame and automatically trigger the system.

When activated, it projects an infrasound field that drives oxygen away from vulnerable surfaces, preventing embers from igniting the structure. The company's tests have demonstrated suppression from up to 25 feet away.

Independent experts note that the science aligns with long-known principles of combustion dynamics. "Acoustic influence on flames is well known in combustion," Albert Simeoni, who leads Worcester Polytechnic Institute's department of fire protection engineering, told Scientific American. Still, Simeoni cautions that scaling up the technology poses a challenge. Strong, low-frequency waves can have unintended vibrational effects, so engineering them safely requires precision control.

Other fire researchers, such as University of Maryland department head Arnaud Trouvé, point out that acoustic methods are most effective on small flames. Wildfires produce complex heat flows that are harder to disrupt acoustically. Even so, the potential to protect structures from ignition – a major cause of wildfire losses – makes the concept attractive.

Sonic Fire Tech is now partnering with two California utilities to deploy demonstration systems and expects roughly 50 pilot installations by early 2026. Early adopters include homeowners in high-risk areas looking for an alternative to traditional fireproofing or sprinkler systems.

If these trials succeed, infrasound could join drones, AI-based detection, and other emerging tools in the growing arsenal of wildfire defense technology.

Permalink to story:

 
Best defense is a good offense. There's far too much underbrush in those forests from decades of preventing fires, and the fires will only grow larger with time.
 
Sounds promising actually, but don't forget the elephant in the room: " Sonic's system works through a piston-based generator powered by an electric motor. "

One of the first things to shutdown / get damaged are the electric wires in a burning area (unless they are buried and protected in some way. But this America, wires are in the air, not underground, with minor exceptions and if you live in a rural area.....well, you know the answer.

It reminds of people in areas with wild fires, like in Florida (yeah, not only California burns in the dry season!), people keep repeating: "Our property irrigation / sprinkler system would help if there is a fire..".
No it won't, see above! Add a power generator then get back to me on this one.

PS: I have 2 generators that, with a flip of a switch - will provide power to whole house, the pumps AND the irrigation sprinkler system - should we lose power OR if there is a wild fire.
 
This sounds like something that could work with conventional fire suppression systems that limit the flame.

I can’t see the system being useful sitting on the back of an electric truck (being california net zero and all that) being sent in to stop fires, it doesn’t suppress the heat or fuel like water so as soon as wind comes the effect is undone. And anyone that has worked in or near a large fire knows fires generate their own wind.

 
I'd rather chisel out the border of California and then launch it into the Pacific to float away. Don't get too excited though because the next step is to sink and flood Texas to create the New Gulf of New Mexico.

Then maybe, MAYBE, I won't be prompted to read about this.
 
Another California startup exploiting taxpayers’ money. Sure, the California government has already allocated funds to the startup.
 
Another California startup exploiting taxpayers’ money. Sure, the California government has already allocated funds to the startup.
First of all, how do you know they got taxpayers money? Second, What's a difference who will get those money, then or AI scam corpos, or elon musk... Because sure as hell is taxpayers wont see them ever back.
 
Back