Coinbase CEO fired engineers who refused to use AI

midian182

Posts: 11,705   +177
Staff member
A hot potato: Several big tech companies now tell employees that using AI for work tasks isn't just advisable; it's mandatory. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has revealed that when some engineers didn't immediately try the technology when it was introduced at the crypto firm, they were promptly fired.

Speaking on Stripe president John Collison's Cheeky Pint podcast, Armstrong talked about how Coinbase bought GitHub Copilot and Cursor enterprise licenses for every engineer at the company.

The CEO was warned by employees that adoption of the AI would be slow, and that it could take months to get even half the engineers using it.

Shocked by this news, Armstrong posted a mandate in the company's Slack channel demanding that everyone must learn to use the technology. While they didn't have to use AI every day until after receiving more training, all engineers at the very least had to onboard it by the end of the week.

Armstrong said a meeting had been scheduled for Saturday, giving those who refused to follow the mandate a chance to explain why.

During the meeting, some people had genuine reasons for ignoring Armstrong's message, such as just getting back from a vacation or work trip. Those who had simply refused to use AI in their work were fired.

The Coinbase boss admits that his tactics were "heavy handed," and there were people in the company who didn't like how he handled the situation. But it sent a clear message to others that using AI was not optional.

Armstrong said his goal is for half of the company's code to be written by AI before the quarter ends. That's more than both Microsoft and Google, both of which said this year that up to 30% of the code they produce is AI generated.

To meet this target, Coinbase hosts monthly "AI speed run" training sessions where teams that have developed creative ways to use AI share their techniques.

Armstrong's aggressive push isn't unusual. Duolingo employees are also expected to use AI by default, something that is taken into account during performance reviews. Microsoft mandates its use, as does Yahoo Japan, which aims to "double" productivity as a result. While many other firms strongly encourage AI use, expect more to change this to a requirement as time goes on.

Despite these CEOs' obsession, multiple studies suggest AI can hinder productivity rather than help. One found experienced developers took 19% longer using AI, while workers at Amazon say shrinking teams and higher demands create an assembly-line culture that stifles creativity. Call center staff likewise reported AI assistants often cause more issues than they resolve.

Permalink to story:

 
The way this was done was incredibly dumb. Using LLMs to assist with programming is not. There are right ways to use them and a lot of wrong ways. Someone refusing to learn something new is a major problem though. Companies die when the become filled with people unable to adapt to the times.
 
Insane case of micro management and corporate insanity, has he got money invested in Nvidia or something to be so obsessed with AI that he mandates how his own damn employees (who should be hired based on expertise and abilities) do their job or be fired?
 
There are always executives who have a blind trust in the next great thing. We do not know at what extent he required them to use it. I can imagine that he just wanted them to upload work on AI, literally taking responsibility for whatever AI does. And this would not be a good scenario.
 
I'm of course going to side with any engineer who evaluated the tools and concluded they were counterproductive, or who simply stated they did not have sufficient time to both do that and complete their other assignments.

Where I maybe have a little wiggle room for management is on the gross insubordination of just ignoring the instructions and one of the major areas of change in the software world. Asking your fulltime software developers to have at least a basic fluency in the current state of AI capabilities - particularly when you're providing the tools and training at your cost - doesn't seem that outrageous to me. If he fired them because he didn't want to pay people who were willing to completely ignore directions, he's got a point.

If he fired them because he believes all the headlines and that he's going to get a 50% boost in development for free, he's in for a rude surprise. (btw, the more I've dug into the claims on the headlines, the more acknowledgements I've been seeing that those figures relate mostly to lines that include auto-complete suggestions, or auto-generated docblock comments, or other boilerplate, which is a whole lot different than saying 50% of an organization's development to do list was handled by AI.)
 
Any trust I had in coinbase is gone. Forcing AI like this means they will likely have hidden bugs where you lose your money. That clueless CEO should be fired. Staff are supposed to prioritize a safe and reliable service.
 
This is more like a dictatorship in your work place.
not a pleasant environment to work.

I feel day by day closer to '1984'.
The dictatorship that's coming is a corporation one unlike the state dictatorships we've seen until now.
 
Utterly stupid CEO. Required training is nothing new. But this impulsive and borderline irrational action just killed morale for all remaining engineers. Expect AI to be used to polish resumes this week. Coinbase isn't the only fintech company that's hiring.

Use required tools or be fired sounds reasonable to me.
 
Use required tools or be fired sounds reasonable to me.
Most of the employees know that by using the required tools they are in fact training the AI to do their job, and it is only a matter of time before they are sacked for an AI replacement.
 
Most of the employees know that by using the required tools they are in fact training the AI to do their job, and it is only a matter of time before they are sacked for an AI replacement.
that may be, but better to comply while looking for a new job, this is ultimately their failure
 
Back