Court documents reveal Samsung paid Microsoft $1 billion in Android royalties in 2013

Himanshu Arora

Posts: 902   +7
Staff

Samsung paid Microsoft over $1 billion last year in royalties to use the latter's technology in its Android-powered devices, according to a recent filing in the Microsoft vs. Samsung US District Court patent-royalty case, which was filed this summer.

Back in 2011, Samsung entered into a patent-licensing contract with Microsoft, under which it agreed to make patent royalty payment to the latter for a period of seven fiscal years, in exchange for the right to use patented Microsoft technology in its Android smartphones and tablets.

In August this year, Microsoft dragged Samsung to court for failing to pay its year-two royalty payment on time, as well as interest for the same. On the other hand Samsung, which is one of the many companies paying the software giant Android patent licensing fees, is claiming that Microsoft's acquisition of Nokia's handset business has invalidated the agreement, and is refusing to make any further payments.

Unsurprisingly, Microsoft doesn't agree with the argument, and is seeking $6.9 million in damages, a figure which was calculated based on the $1 billion that the South Korean company owed Microsoft in royalties as of August 29, 2013.

Microsoft hopes that Samsung will pony up the money. "We are confident that our case is strong and that we will be successful", said Deputy General Counsel David Howard, adding that the company values and respects its long partnership with Samsung, is committed to it, and expects it to continue.

Permalink to story.

 
Thats stupid its the extortion their doing with exfat they care how much they hurt progress just about money
 
Thats stupid its the extortion their doing with exfat they care how much they hurt progress just about money
Your sentence hurts grammar.
Grammar is the logic of speech, even as logic is the grammar of reason. ~Richard C. Trench
 
Samsung won't do anything until a few seconds before it has to. The company has a fine record of not paying licence fees until sued. A short list from recent memory:
$500 million to InterDigital
~$550 million to Kodak
$59 million to Pioneer
undisclosed amount to Sharp
Relative peanuts when Samsung are responsible for 20% of South Korea's GDP. I think the company actually enjoys its rogue status - no other reason to revel in bribing the government then (fingers-crossed) saying they'll be good from now on...until the big-wig is pardoned, then it's business as usual..
 
Most likely M$ is in the right here. A deal was signed between the two and it sounds like Samsung is trying to renege. I wonder if they would complain if everybody who bought their products started paying for them a year later, decided they were obsolete by then and not to pony up any more...
 
Inb4 microsoft sues apple, IBM, paypal, amazon.. why doesn't google change android or create custom software so microsoft cant collect royalties?
 
Back