Diabetes patient produces own insulin after gene-edited cell transplant - without anti-rejection drugs

midian182

Posts: 11,726   +177
Staff member
What just happened? The dream of a cure for type 1 diabetes may have taken a step closer after a man with the disease received a transplant of genetically altered pancreatic cells that allowed his body to produce its own insulin. The important factor here is that the patient did not require the usual immunosuppressant anti-rejection drugs, which are normally taken for life and can have extreme effects.

In December 2024, a 42-year-old Swedish man with type 1 diabetes received 17 injections of donated islet cells. They had been genetically modified via CRISPR to avoid the need for immunosuppressive medicine.

Islet transplantation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes – an autoimmune condition where the body attacks pancreatic cells that make insulin for an unknown reason, thereby requiring administration of synthetic insulin – has been around for two decades, though it was only approved in the US in 2023. But in addition to the supply of donated beta cells being low, patients must take anti-rejection drugs for life, the effects of which are often considered worse than living with well-controlled type 1.

Scientists have been looking for a way to transplant islet cells that provide a constant supply of insulin for type 1 diabetics, and without the need for permanent post-op drugs, which would be the closest thing to a cure.

Researchers at Sana Biotechnology used the CRISPR genome editor to eliminate the HLA-I and HLA-II antigens, which can prompt an immune rejection, from the donated beta cells. The cells were also engineered to produce more of the CD47 protein that signals to immune cells to prevent attacks by the immune system.

After tests were carried out on rodents and a monkey, researchers injected the cells into the forearm of the man, who has had type 1 diabetes since 1987. While the immune system did kill the unedited donor cells, the fully edited beta cells survived – without immunosuppressants – and were manufacturing insulin three months after the procedure.

It's important to note that the man still needs to take insulin to keep his blood sugar in range; Per-Ola Carlsson of Uppsala University said, "We transplanted 7% of a curing dose." But the test marks a major step toward a cure that many with type 1 diabetes have been told would arrive "within the next decade" since the 1970s.

The patient will now be monitored for 15 years, as required by EU regulations. Sana's next step is to genetically engineer beta cells grown from stem cells in culture, enabling a far greater supply than relying solely on donor cells.

Permalink to story:

 
This will be $20 everywhere in the world except the US. As a diabetic in the US (or cancer patient, or HIV) you get treated like a cash filled piñata to be beaten on demand.
Devils advocate: in the rest of the world you are either

A) paying 50-75% income tax (compared to 15-30% in the US) and paying 20%+ VAT (vs 5-8% sales tax US) plus any additional fees and taxes your local councils implement, while also making 2/3rds equivalent to US wages on top of that

Or

B) You live in the 2/3rds of the world that subsists on peanuts, where that $20 fee may as well be a week's salary.

In both cases, you also get to enjoy far longer wait times and denial of the latest drugs or treatments because they are too expensive. If you're Canadian, you also get the joy of the government pushing MAID on you if you get too expensive.
 
Devils advocate: in the rest of the world you are either

A) paying 50-75% income tax (compared to 15-30% in the US) and paying 20%+ VAT (vs 5-8% sales tax US) plus any additional fees and taxes your local councils implement, while also making 2/3rds equivalent to US wages on top of that

Or

B) You live in the 2/3rds of the world that subsists on peanuts, where that $20 fee may as well be a week's salary.

In both cases, you also get to enjoy far longer wait times and denial of the latest drugs or treatments because they are too expensive. If you're Canadian, you also get the joy of the government pushing MAID on you if you get too expensive.
You're smoking crack if you think taxes in the US are limited to 15-30%. You conveniently left out state sales taxes on everything purchased that range from 5-18% depending on location, county taxes on goods and services, city taxes on gasoline, goods and services, state taxes on gasoline, and property taxes levied by city, state and counties. Most working Americans are paying 50% or more in taxes.
 
Last edited:
Devils advocate: in the rest of the world you are either

A) paying 50-75% income tax (compared to 15-30% in the US) and paying 20%+ VAT (vs 5-8% sales tax US) plus any additional fees and taxes your local councils implement, while also making 2/3rds equivalent to US wages on top of that

Or

B) You live in the 2/3rds of the world that subsists on peanuts, where that $20 fee may as well be a week's salary.

In both cases, you also get to enjoy far longer wait times and denial of the latest drugs or treatments because they are too expensive. If you're Canadian, you also get the joy of the government pushing MAID on you if you get too expensive.

Americans' now just making up BS to make their own misery seem good.
My countries top tax rate is ~40% for earnings over $100K and we have largely free medical with a small 1.5% tax for universal health care and shockingly for Americans, were not a communist state.
 
Hope this pans out. Got two coworkers that run around with those pumps and have to refill them all the time.
 
You're smoking crack if you think taxes in the US are limited to 15-30%. You conveniently left out state sales taxes on everything purchased that range from 5-18% depending on location, county taxes on goods and services, city taxes on gasoline, goods and services, state taxes on gasoline, and property taxes levied by city, state and counties. Most working Americans are paying 50% or more in taxes.
Don't forget state income taxes too. Not all states have them but for those that do, like California, it can be substantial.
 
I love how Americans, as one of the richest countries in the world, just LOVE to whine and complain all day about how bad they have it.
 
I love how Americans, as one of the richest countries in the world, just LOVE to whine and complain all day about how bad they have it.
I love how Russians like to whine and complain about conscription to support their war with Ukraine.
 
FYI: Most countries with free universal healthcare spend spend about 6-10% GDP on healthcare.

The US spends 18%.

Just switching to universal medicare for everyone would save us ~5% of our GDP immediately.
Over the next coupe of years we would gain another 3 to 5% GDP because it makes lots of other things cheaper in the long run such as ambulances, life-flights, administration, general drug costs, etc.
Then add the costs of small issues becoming big issues over time because people could not afford to go to the doctor. The saving slowly snowball.

Rural healthcare would get a boost too because hospitals would be paid for based on the population and need and not profit, and this in turn leads to better health for the surrounding community.
Which again leads to less need for major medical interventions..


The list goes on.



 
FYI: Most countries with free universal healthcare spend spend about 6-10% GDP on healthcare.

The US spends 18%.

Just switching to universal medicare for everyone would save us ~5% of our GDP immediately.
Over the next coupe of years we would gain another 3 to 5% GDP because it makes lots of other things cheaper in the long run such as ambulances, life-flights, administration, general drug costs, etc.
Then add the costs of small issues becoming big issues over time because people could not afford to go to the doctor. The saving slowly snowball.

Rural healthcare would get a boost too because hospitals would be paid for based on the population and need and not profit, and this in turn leads to better health for the surrounding community.
Which again leads to less need for major medical interventions..


The list goes on.
Have you ever actually lived in a country with universal healthcare? Based on your comments I'd say no. I have lived in several countries with universal care. I'm a German-born, naturalized US citizen and I can tell you first-hand that universal healthcare is awful. It's rationed care and everybody gets their Band-Aid and that's it. If you need to see your primary care physician, it's a 6-month wait, the logic being that you'll either get better on your own or you'll die before your appointment date, and look at all the money we've saved the taxpayer. If you need a referral to see a medical specialist like a neurologist or nephrologist you'll be waiting for years, if you live that long. Germans who can afford better care fly to Miami or New York City because the US has the best healthcare in the world. You get what you pay for.....
 
Back