DragonFire laser weapon can hit a coin from a kilometer away for around $13 a shot

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,375   +43
Staff
Forward-looking: Laser weapons have steadily progressed in recent years, with the US successfully testing an aerial defense system that is theoretically more cost-effective than using physical ammunition. The UK has now achieved a similar milestone, suggesting that lasers could potentially replace missiles in certain situations.

The UK has successfully tested a laser weapon that is highly accurate and cost-effective.

Using an intense beam of light, the 50kW turret-mounted DragonFire weapon can cut through targets or cause explosions if a warhead is targeted. The exact range is classified, but it can strike any visible target at the speed of light with accuracy comparable to hitting a quarter from half a mile away.

The most significant advantage of laser weapons is cost. The all-electric system requires no physical ammunition, explosives, or propellant, and can theoretically fire an infinite number of shots as long as energy is available. Firing DragonFire for 10 seconds costs as much as running a standard heater for an hour, with each blast costing about $13 at most.

By comparison, the US Navy is currently firing missiles costing up to $2.1 million each to shoot down Houthi drones in the Red Sea.

The recent DragonFire trial marks the latest development in a £100 million program involving the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, the UK Ministry of Defence, and private companies MBDA, Leonardo, and QinetiQ. Although the army and the Royal Navy currently have no concrete plans to deploy lasers, both could potentially use them for air defense.

Earlier tests validated DragonFire's ability to track moving air and sea targets. In 2022, the US Navy tested a similar system called Layered Laser Defense (LLD), successfully downing drones and indicating its capability against subsonic cruise missiles. Firing LLD costs around $1 per shot and can also disable sensors.

However, deploying lasers presents challenges and trade-offs. Finding space and energy to install them on existing vessels is a primary obstacle. The weapons are also sensitive to environmental conditions like fog, and missiles remain more effective at hitting targets beyond visual range. Additionally, a laser requires a few seconds of sustained fire to destroy a target. Despite these challenges, these once-fictional weapons could play a significant role in the future.

Permalink to story.

 
Imagine tens of thousands of these integrated into Starlink satellites, let's send the idea to Musk, so he can sell it to NASA too.
 
One of our former managers at work is a retired CPO on an aircraft carrier. We started talking about weapons and some his answers left us hanging in the air...
 
Last edited:
Hmm
highly polished and reflective surface on the outside and with high thermal dissipation capacity and then a layer of fast-reacting ablative material

-Yeah all that to line a defense contractor's pockets, or the old fashioned approach of just firing 10 dummy missiles for every one with a warhead to overwhelm defense systems on the cheap.
 
I guess the armed forces have never heard, or chose not to remember EMP weapons that can disrupt anything electric in a battlefield. And I bet the defense industry doesn't want them to remember that either.

But hey, it's a fair-weather, multi-million dollar toy that enriches their defence industry pals, so all is good.
 
"US successfully testing an aerial defense system"

There is no Defense usage for this weapon... It's all Offense...!
 
"The exact range is classified, but it can strike any visible target at the speed of light with accuracy comparable to hitting a quarter from half a mile away."

I am revealing the secret...!
Half a Mile = 0.805 kilometer... The Range is not more than One Kilometer...! The effective range would be even less than that...!
 
Last edited:
"Despite these challenges, these once-fictional weapons could play a significant role in the future."

Nonsense.... It would be a visible glorious rainbow target for the enemy...!
 
"Despite these challenges, these once-fictional weapons could play a significant role in the future."

Nonsense.... It would be a visible glorious rainbow target for the enemy...!

Thinking about it sitting as ducks on war fronts... Well it could be mounted in warships, bombers, and if there's a place where the so ellusive "new battery tech" would appear could be in the army in the way of high capacity solid state batteries pack that would enable smaller aircraft or armored vehicles to carry some death laser around the battlefield, enabling them to shot like say 20 shots with one battery pack?

Seems possible.
 
I guess the armed forces have never heard, or chose not to remember EMP weapons that can disrupt anything electric in a battlefield. And I bet the defense industry doesn't want them to remember that either.

But hey, it's a fair-weather, multi-million dollar toy that enriches their defence industry pals, so all is good.

Which applies to other active defense system (missiles, etc.) as well as their targeting methods, as well.
 
-Yeah all that to line a defense contractor's pockets, or the old fashioned approach of just firing 10 dummy missiles for every one with a warhead to overwhelm defense systems on the cheap.

Warheads aren't the expensive part. The guidance system is. If the dummies are anything other than actual dummies (which means they'll stand out behavior-wise), then they're not that cheap.
 
Back